Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

HUMAN MIGRATION TRACKED IN STANFORD COMPUTER SIMULATION
Stanford University Medical Center ^ | 21 January 2004 | Amy Adams

Posted on 01/23/2004 7:18:12 AM PST by PatrickHenry

STANFORD, Calif. – Early humans migrating from Africa carried small genetic differences like so much flotsam in an ocean current. Today’s studies give only a snapshot of where that genetic baggage came to rest without revealing the tides that brought it there. Now researchers at the Stanford University School of Medicine have devised a model for pinpointing where mutations first appeared, providing a new way to trace the migratory path of our earliest ancestors.

The study was led by Luca Cavalli-Sforza, PhD, emeritus professor of genetics, who has spent most of his career tracking the evolution of modern humans. Much of his current work involves following mutations in the Y chromosome, which is passed exclusively from father to son, as humans migrated from Africa and spread to the rest of the world during the past 50,000 years.

These mutations, most of which cause no physical change, tend to appear at a constant rate, providing a genetic timer. For example, if a population has 10 mutations after 50,000 years of evolution from the common ancestor in Africa, then the fifth mutation probably arose 25,000 years ago. But where was the population located at that time? Until now genetics hasn’t had an answer.

“If we know the time when a mutation arose we know something. If we also knew the place we’d know almost everything,” Cavalli-Sforza said.

With the help of senior application software developer Christopher Edmonds and statistician Anita Lillie, both researchers at Stanford, Cavalli-Sforza built a computer model to simulate how mutations spread in a migrating population. The results of this work are published in this week’s online issue of Proceedings of the National Academies of Science.

The group reduced the world’s continents to a simple rectangular grid. They populated the first few squares with computerized human populations and gave those electronic villages realistic rates for population growth, migration and mutations. The inhabitants had more than one child, on average, and those offspring could migrate to any neighboring square as long as it wasn’t filled to capacity. This population growth filled the initial squares to capacity and pushed the computerized people to migrate at a constant rate across their rectangular territory until the next space was filled.

When a mutation appeared within a population, descendants reproduced and migrated at the same rate as other individuals. Most of the mutations, however, simply disappeared due to chance.

Those mutations that stayed in the population until the simulation ended showed one of two patterns. If the mutation appeared in a heavily populated area, it had a lower chance of surviving for many generations or reaching high numbers. In these cases, the mutation remained extremely rare in the local population.

If a mutation appeared in a person at the edge of the migration front where the population was scarce, the mutation was more likely to spread through the population. The mutation-carrying person multiplied and the offspring migrated, taking the mutation to neighboring squares. If these neighboring squares were previously unoccupied, the mutated person had a high probability of reproducing and passing along the mutation. The mutation itself remained most common in the migratory wave front, a situation Cavalli-Sforza refers to as “surfing” the migratory wave.

Over the course of 64,000 simulations, the group came up with a model for finding a mutation’s origin. First they identified the mutation’s farthest edge – corresponding with a boundary such as the ocean or mountain range in human populations. Then they calculated the average area of where the mutation is distributed – called the mutation’s centroid. According to the models, the centroid is about half the distance between where the mutation arose and where it ended up.

In at least some simulations, the mutation no longer existed in the population where it first arose. Without the group’s way of estimating distance, there might be no trace of the mutation’s place of origin. Now they can generate a dated “we were here” sign to place on the route of human migration.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: crevolist; evolution; migration
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last
To: All
I feel rude even asking this question, but when I read the initial theorem that all humans have evolved from that life form which existed in Africa, I had no problem with the idea posited, but, I wanted to ask further:

Was the continent of Africa as it is now too? Haven't the land masses shaped and reshaped, and shrunk and enlarged to some extent? Perhaps what we now consider Africa was not at its current location in relation to other bodies of land, and perhaps it had an entirely different weather system.

Perhaps all the great land masses were at one time joined and the oceans were smaller then, as I understand it they are currently growing larger, taking land shelf areas and islands under water.

If mankind has evolved greatly, would it not be fair to think that the earth's land masses have also evolved both in size, shape, ecological factors and location geographically?

The only land mass I ever hear discussed is the Alaskan/Russian bridge over which the original Mongolian tribes travelled to become the ancestral race of the indigenous North and South American peoples.

What about all the other continental regions?

I know curiosity killed the cat.
21 posted on 01/23/2004 1:06:04 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble
This might be of interest to you re: the continents.

link

"According to the continental drift theory, the supercontinent Pangaea began to break up about 225-200 million years ago, eventually fragmenting into the continents as we know them today."

The link shows various diagrams of the continents splitting off.

22 posted on 01/23/2004 1:16:07 PM PST by texasbluebell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62
I thought this was going to be another thread about amnesty.

I was thinking more along the lines of the government tracking people via top secret transponders in cell phones. /tinfoil hat

23 posted on 01/23/2004 1:16:19 PM PST by BureaucratusMaximus (Principled conservatives need not apply...we're all centrists now. Shut up & pay your taxes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble
Continental Drift: An Introductory Guide.
Continental Drift.
theory of continental drift.
24 posted on 01/23/2004 1:19:06 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: CobaltBlue
My own DNA will tell me whether it's true that my great-great-grandmother was half Native American

LOL. It's always amazing to me when I here white folks talk about their Cherokee ancestors. It's a riot. So many people at my work claim they have Native blood that you'd think we have Ghost Dance or something. LMAO!

25 posted on 01/23/2004 1:25:59 PM PST by I got the rope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell
I unknowingly posted the link you gave among the three that I provided. I guess that means it's a good one.
26 posted on 01/23/2004 1:27:24 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
Well, my great-grandmother was a student at the Carlisle Indian School in Carlisle, PA. I obtained her student record from the National Archives, and she is listed as half Chippewa. So I don't think there is any question that she was part Chippewa. What I specifically want to know is whether the Chippewa was on the maternal side or the paternal.

I think probably maternal, that's the family oral history, but I am having trouble tracing her side of the family any further back than 1880.
27 posted on 01/23/2004 1:32:14 PM PST by CobaltBlue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
It would be fun to do a similar model with linguistic chances

Yes! Let me know if you ever do one.

28 posted on 01/23/2004 1:33:22 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
I can program a computer to give you any result you want... what's the big deal?
29 posted on 01/23/2004 1:37:14 PM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
It would be fun to do a similar model with linguistic chances ...

And cultural changes too. I'm specifically thinking of the American Revolution, which certainly could be regarded as on the "migratory wave front" of European civilization. My guess would be that in any culture's "heartland," the tendency would be toward stasis. There are probably examples going both ways.

30 posted on 01/23/2004 1:39:15 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I can program a computer to give you any result you want... what's the big deal?

The big deal is that this article discusses a computer model which gives a result consistent with observed reality. Thus, perhaps the model has something worthwhile to tell us.

31 posted on 01/23/2004 1:42:49 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
With the possibility that your both right...
32 posted on 01/23/2004 1:44:46 PM PST by mpreston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
You missed my point- I can program it to give a desired result especially if I have a known result.

Trust me on this- no computer program is anything more than what the programmers put into it.
33 posted on 01/23/2004 1:45:18 PM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
Probably next they'll want to use real data and pop on over to the Global Climate Lab to use their earth model.
34 posted on 01/23/2004 1:50:02 PM PST by RightWhale (Repeal the Law of the Excluded Middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
I can program it to give a desired result especially if I have a known result.

Maybe, if you fudged the starting point, or the rate of mutation, or the rate of migration. But to make a model consistent with all known factors, and end up with something consistent with the diversity we now see, tells us that you can get from there to here in a manner that makes biological sense. That's not just a worthless model.

35 posted on 01/23/2004 1:54:55 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PatrickHenry
are you a programmer?
36 posted on 01/23/2004 1:57:05 PM PST by Mr. K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
It's always amazing to me when I here white folks talk about their Cherokee ancestors.

So do black folks --- only I believe they most likely do. The Indians went somewhere --- and there aren't many pure Indians tribes left --- they went into the other populations here. One Indian ancestor 6 generations back could have hundreds of thousands of white and black and indian descendents.

37 posted on 01/23/2004 1:59:57 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: texasbluebell; PatrickHenry
Thanks to both of you. I could only recall the word "plate" and from the little I knew of the subject, I hesitatated for a while to even ask my question.

I appreciate nobody threw creme pies at me!!!

Now for some reading!
38 posted on 01/23/2004 2:00:32 PM PST by imintrouble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
No, I'm not a programmer. As you appear to be, then let me know if you can program a model giving the same result as the one in the article, with the same mutation and migration rates, but with a starting point of only 6,000 years in the past.
39 posted on 01/23/2004 2:01:37 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: imintrouble
I appreciate nobody threw creme pies at me!!!

We only throw pies when someone seems to reject all evidence and rational argument. Until then, we're pleased to provide information.

40 posted on 01/23/2004 2:05:13 PM PST by PatrickHenry (Hic amor, haec patria est.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-74 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson