Skip to comments.
NOW Outraged by Bush's Underhanded Appointment of Pickering
National Organization for Women ^
| 1/16/2004
Posted on 01/18/2004 12:55:52 AM PST by Jaysun
NOW Outraged by Bush's Underhanded Appointment of Pickering
January 16, 2004
"The National Organization for Women is outraged by George W. Bush's installation of Charles Pickering on the federal appeals court while Congress is in recess," said NOW President Kim Gandy. "We're no longer surprised by the underhandedness of this PresidentBush apparently thinks that he can act unilaterally wherever and whenever he pleases."
"NOW has vigorously opposed Pickering's nomination to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals for more than two years, and the Senate Judiciary Committee rejected this foe of women's rights once before," said Gandy. "We will certainly work to ensure that this unmerited appointment is overturned when the next Congress takes office in January 2005."
Pickering, a district court judge from Mississippi, has a long record of opposing civil rights and civil liberties, demonstrating significant judicial activism from the bench. He was an opponent of the Equal Rights Amendment and has expressed his support for a constitutional amendment banning abortion. As a state senator, Pickering repeatedly voted against measures that would expand electoral opportunities for African Americans after passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965.
"Bush's total disregard for the Democratic members of Congress who rightfully blocked Pickering's nomination, his disregard for the women of this country and for democracy in general are appalling," said Gandy. "All the more reason for women's rights supporters to get active and to vote Bush out of office in November."
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bulldykes; charlespickering; court; judge; nags; now; pickering; spinsters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
To: Jaysun
Frustrate 1 liberal a day, that's all we ask.
81
posted on
01/18/2004 8:03:32 AM PST
by
ChadGore
(George W. Bush has done more to earn my vote than any other American alive today.)
To: goldstategop
I think I'm going to try a different reply to idiot fanatics complaining about partial birth infanticide.
I may even ask first if they advocate later termination as many of their philosophical bent have advocated--say a few days or weeks to see if the child is going to be worth the bother to keep around or not.
And then note:
"Well, given your contributions to our land, it's obvious your mother made a mistake in not exercising her rights to infanticide! Would you care to volunteer now to correct her error? Clearly your breathing air and taking up space is a real drag on the planet! Think of it as the 'Green thing to do!' Just think, you could start a whole new movement--VOLUNTEERS 2 RIGHT MISSED INFANTICIDES!"
Actually, perhaps we could set up
A MORE MODEST PROPOSAL.
"You could volunteer in a setting which might decrease violence and keep those dastardly aggressive hunters off the streets. You could volunteer on Dr No's Island. Think of the exileration of the chase. Think of the thrill of going out in a blaze or blast of primeval glory as the hunter practices a long range shot. Besides, you could be helping the war on terror. I hear target practice is a good thing!"
/sar
82
posted on
01/18/2004 8:13:01 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: ThirstyMan
NOWAS
National Organization of Women Against Sanity
83
posted on
01/18/2004 8:15:11 AM PST
by
Quix
(Choose this day whom U will serve: Shrillery & demonic goons or The King of Kings and Lord of Lords)
To: Jaysun
Anything that causes NOW to be "outraged" is good for society. This holds esspecially true if the brainsick Kim Gandy feels the need to clack her dentures KIM GUMP?
NOW happens. Stupid is as Gandy does. Step away from the box of chocolates, Kim.
84
posted on
01/18/2004 8:16:43 AM PST
by
Mark Turbo
(Safety: The official state religion.)
To: Jaysun
"Bush's total disregard for ......the women of this country" Because he appointed a guy despised by the bitter lesbos in NOW? ...... LMAO/
85
posted on
01/18/2004 8:18:28 AM PST
by
Mr. Mojo
To: Jaysun
NOW Outraged by Bush's Underhanded Appointment of Pickering You know you're doing mankind a great service when The Bitch is 'outraged.'
86
posted on
01/18/2004 8:57:33 AM PST
by
the invisib1e hand
(do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
To: wiseone; hellinahandcart; NYC GOP Chick; countrydummy
LOL!
87
posted on
01/18/2004 8:57:49 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Graduate, Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training)
To: ThirstyMan; hellinahandcart
Rearrange it. Sexist Organization of Women or SOW!
88
posted on
01/18/2004 9:00:47 AM PST
by
sauropod
(Graduate, Boortz Institute for Insensitivity Training)
To: randita
Most of us hope that you have under estimated the 2004 senate elections and presidential elections in 2004 in your two paragraphs below.
"Gandy and her cohorts have their work ct out for them in 2005. With the vacating of five Democrat seats in the south (LA, FL, SC, GA, NC) and the likelihood of 4, if not all 5 turning GOP, the ability to filibuster judicial appointees will be close to impossible."
"Also, if Bush wins overwhelmingly in 2004, it will appear even more ludicrous than it does now to claim Bush's nominees are not in the mainstream."
Your last paragraph will be our battle cry after GW's election in 2004.
89
posted on
01/18/2004 9:04:59 AM PST
by
Grampa Dave
(GW is driving every rat in America into a deeper insanity, 24/7/365!)
To: Jaysun
Good, now its time to recess appoint the rest
I'd like to see NOW complaining about a black woman being put on the federal bench.
90
posted on
01/18/2004 9:06:22 AM PST
by
Cubs Fan
To: Jaysun
Channel 5 news/Chicago had story about the Pickering appointment last night. The story was actually an editorial about how evil President Bush was for abusing the constitutional process.
91
posted on
01/18/2004 9:21:16 AM PST
by
Mini-14
To: Jaysun
"President Clinton, in a recess appointment, named Bill Lann Lee as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights of the Department of Justice Aug. 3. Lee, who has been serving as acting assistant attorney general since December 1997, will continue in the position until the end of Clintons term this January." I wonder if NOW protested this recess appointment by Clinton...not. I do wonder how such partisan organizations qualify for non-tax status in terms of donations.
92
posted on
01/18/2004 9:28:26 AM PST
by
kabar
To: thoughtomator
This is true. But, while it's OK right now, we don't want 'em outraged at election time -- it only encourages them to vote!
93
posted on
01/18/2004 9:40:22 AM PST
by
expatpat
To: Jaysun
"The National Organization for Women is outraged by George W. Bush's installation of Charles Pickering on the federal appeals court while Congress is in recess," said NOW President Kim Gandy. "We're no longer surprised by the underhandedness of this PresidentBush apparently thinks that he can act unilaterally wherever and whenever he pleases."Oh, boo f'in hoo. Take a valium and get over it.
94
posted on
01/18/2004 10:08:00 AM PST
by
3catsanadog
(When anything goes, everything does.)
To: OK
Have we always had to have a majority of 60, or has this been a recent development (i.e., the past 2-5 years)? I'm guessing the Democrats changed this when they started losing Senate seats.
95
posted on
01/18/2004 10:14:17 AM PST
by
3catsanadog
(When anything goes, everything does.)
To: 3catsanadog
"Can you name the imporant members of the feminst movment, kyle?".
"A bunch of fat old hags"
"Yes but what were there names?"
To: Jaysun
"Anything that causes NOW to be "outraged" is good for society. This holds esspecially true if the brainsick Kim Gandy feels the need to clack her dentures like she's having a convulsive seizure"
ROTF>>>>>>>>>
97
posted on
01/18/2004 11:28:16 AM PST
by
international american
(support our troops...........................revoke Hillary's visa!!)
To: Jaysun
The dems should be grateful to Bush for assuaging their fears about his making lifetime judicial appointments.
Ode on Math, dedicated to Kim Gandy
I think it's just dandy, Kim Gandy..
I love how OUR President worksThe Dems said,
"It's wrong... a lifetime's too long,"
This judge got one year.
Don't be jerks.
98
posted on
01/18/2004 12:54:01 PM PST
by
syriacus
(Schumer's unhappy fed judges have lifetime positions. He should work to amend the US Const.)
To: Jaysun
Pound sand, lesbos.
99
posted on
01/18/2004 12:57:05 PM PST
by
Keith
(IT'S ALL ABOUT THE JUDGES)
To: Capitalism2003
I don't understand why Bush is stopping with Pickering. He should give Estrada a call and see if he is still interested...Get Estrada, Priscilla Owen, Janice Rogers Brown, and all the rest on the courts asap.
I'm with you. If the Democrats are intent on blocking normal people in order to pander to the kooks that pay their meal tickets, then we have to use whatever method available.
100
posted on
01/18/2004 1:00:44 PM PST
by
Jaysun
(The liberal mind is so open - so open that ideas simply pass through it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100, 101-107 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson