Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Spectator is right: the Dems are playing for 2008...so who do WE want to run in 2008
Vanity | 1/15/04 | self

Posted on 01/15/2004 12:34:52 PM PST by Salgak

OK, gang.

Barring a catastrophe or another 9/11 attack, it's pretty much a given that President Bush will be re-elected in just under 10 months from today. That's been already listed here on FR today. And Jay Currie has a VERY good point. The Dems KNOW they've already lost this election, and are using it to position for 2008 and, God Help Us, Hillary.

Who do we have / want who is in position to run for the Republican nomination in 2008 ???

Given that President Bush would want to have his successor continue his policies, who you all of you think is a worthy successor to George W. Bush, and our best defense against the Hildebeast ???


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: 2008; challenger; clinton; election; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-454 next last
To: JohnnyZ
Agreed, but Rice with DeWine sounded so good! (There is no other US senator with gastronomic attributes, I checked.)
241 posted on 01/15/2004 2:08:10 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Frist would have to deal with the Senate curse.

Yeah . . . but --

Why do senators have a hard time getting elected president? Is it because they don't project leadership? Or because they're self-important blow-hards who hang out in the world's most exclusive club? Is it because they only have contact with voters every six years?

I think if Frist were to run he'd lay out in a compelling fashion what a Frist Administration would look like, and what its priorities would be. His electoral success in Tennessee was staggering. He is a solid conservative. And he'll have the money to run a good primary campaign.

242 posted on 01/15/2004 2:08:20 PM PST by JohnnyZ (This Week in Senate Races: David Beasley, Katherine Harris, Gary Hart, and Dan Blue DECIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Pres. Bush's proposal if you must, but at least it's a constructive approach to a nearly impossible situation.

LOL! President Bush's proposal is already doomed to failure, and for the very reason you mock me -- impossible enforcement.

Tell me, My2Cents, what employer is going to hire a "documented" illegal and pay him at least minimum wage plus benefits while a stream of undocumented illegals, willing to work for even less, continues to flood the labor market?

The President's proposal won't do one damned thing except spark a whole new wave of illegals to come into this country to take jobs away from the moron aliens who price themselves out of the market by registering.

243 posted on 01/15/2004 2:09:26 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

Comment #244 Removed by Moderator

To: My2Cents
By the way, you said I "hide behind the statement that this behavior is 'illegal'" What does that mean?
245 posted on 01/15/2004 2:12:04 PM PST by kevao
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: NCPAC
Since you seem strongly pro-life, I find it interesting that your tag line is one of Barry Goldwater's most famous quotes. Goldwater was, in the end, pro-choice

Barry Goldwater was, in the end, a lot of very much not conservative things.

246 posted on 01/15/2004 2:12:28 PM PST by JohnnyZ (This Week in Senate Races: David Beasley, Katherine Harris, Gary Hart, and Dan Blue DECIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
"Why do senators have a hard time getting elected president? Is it because they don't project leadership? Or because they're self-important blow-hards who hang out in the world's most exclusive club? Is it because they only have contact with voters every six years?"

All of the above - basically they are too entwined in the Bowels of Washington.

"I think if Frist were to run he'd lay out in a compelling fashion what a Frist Administration would look like, and what its priorities would be. His electoral success in Tennessee was staggering. He is a solid conservative. And he'll have the money to run a good primary campaign."

My only problem with Frist is that we desperately need a Border Control candidate to run in 2008 and i don't think Frist is a Border Control candidate.

The only potential candidates that want Border Control are Owens and Sanford.

Everyone else is squishy on the issue.
247 posted on 01/15/2004 2:12:50 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 242 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Agreed, but Rice with DeWine sounded so good!

Better than Bush with Dick?

248 posted on 01/15/2004 2:14:15 PM PST by JohnnyZ (This Week in Senate Races: David Beasley, Katherine Harris, Gary Hart, and Dan Blue DECIDE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; Clintonfatigued; Dan from Michigan; Coop; Impy; LdSentinal; ...
I forgot about Governor Don Carcieri of Rhode Island, whom JohnnyZ mentioned. Along with Pawlenty, the pro-life conservative Carcieri, who won the governorship with 55% in the most Democratic state of the union, is someone to keep an eye out for. His biggest problem is that he's from a tiny state that the GOP probably wouldn't carry even if he was the VP candidate and which is in a region with very few winnable states. Ceteris paribus, I'd much rather have a Midwesterner like Pawlenty on the ticket. The Great Northeastern Hope of the GOP was Brett Schundler of New Jersey, but unfortunately he lost to McGreevey in 2001 when the RINO establishment did everything it could to ensure a conservative didn't get elected. Had Schundler won the governorship in 2001 and run New Jersey like he ran Jersey City, he'd be one of my top choices for president or VP in 2008.

And if Herman Cain gets elected to the U.S. Senate from Georgia in November, he'd be a bold choice for VP in 2008. Sure, he'd only have been in politics for 4 years, but as a real-life Horatio Alger story who would be the only black in the U.S. Senate (where he'd surely be a force in favor of individual Social Security accounts and other conservative causes), he could convince millions of conservative blacks (most blacks are socially conservative and agree with the GOP on many issues) to come over to our Party. Herman Cain would give us most of the benefits of nominating a Colin Powell or a Condi Rice without sacrificing our conservative principles. But he has to win the Senate primary first!
249 posted on 01/15/2004 2:16:14 PM PST by AuH2ORepublican (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice, moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

Comment #250 Removed by Moderator

To: Salgak; maeng
Anyone but that Gungrabbing, baby killing, big spending, tax raising, union coddling, pro-illegal alien (instructed police not to arrest illegals), cross-dressing, sodomite supporting, two-timing former Mayor of New York.

Rudy for Governor (or Mayor again in 2005), not for President.

BILL OWENS BABY!

251 posted on 01/15/2004 2:18:59 PM PST by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; Kuksool; Clintonfatigued; Dan from Michigan; Coop; Impy; LdSentinal
"I forgot about Governor Don Carcieri of Rhode Island, whom JohnnyZ mentioned. Along with Pawlenty, the pro-life conservative Carcieri, who won the governorship with 55% in the most Democratic state of the union, is someone to keep an eye out for."

Ehh I don't like Carcieri as a POTUS candidate because of the Regional issues - even though he is very Conservative.

We'd be better off running Santorum (To get the Rust Belt), Owens (To Get the West) or Sanford (To get the South).
252 posted on 01/15/2004 2:20:04 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Bill Owens and my former Governor Jeb Bush are the best governors in America, bar none.

Now, I'm back with King RINO Pataki, to be replaced in 2006 by Eliot Spitzer (even worse).

253 posted on 01/15/2004 2:20:28 PM PST by Clemenza (East side, West side, all around the town. Tripping the light fantastic on the sidewalks of New York)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
The one clear choice: Frank Stallone!
254 posted on 01/15/2004 2:21:52 PM PST by jaz.357 (We should be more open-minded toward people trying to kill us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
because his name is Bush most of the country would start in about the Bush monarchy

Unfortunately, you are correct.

However, having hillary and bill back in the White House could be seen as the same thing, and for even better reason. That said, hillary is still well on her way to the coronation, despite all that and be assured the Media will never let the word "dynasty" pass their lips when gushing about her.

From what I understand, Rudi is very pro-gun control, pro-abortion, and very much of a RINO, despite his magnificent leadership during 911. He would easily beat hillary in NY, but the rest of the country is questionable.

So far, I like J. Bush, Allen, Santorum, Barbour or Owens at the top of the ticket. They all have elective experience and would run a good race. For the second line, I would go for Rice, Hayworth, or any of the above who don't make the first cut,... perhaps even J.C. Watts.

The important thing is not letting a RINO onto the top of the ticket and putting somebody in second place who can draw on his/her own, much like Cheney does. They should not be a RINO, either, but in the case of Rice she brightly shines in a lot of needed areas, not just in the sex and race department.

255 posted on 01/15/2004 2:21:57 PM PST by Gritty ("In selecting men for office, let principle be your guide. Look to his character"-Noah Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Clemenza
I'm stuck with John Rowland!

:(
256 posted on 01/15/2004 2:23:01 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

Comment #257 Removed by Moderator

To: wardaddy
"Boy this thread sure tells one how culturally moderate/liberal FR has become...geez."

Quite you uppity Conservative! - you need to to pipe down and accept the Pro-Abortion, Pro-Illegal Immigrant, Pro Palestinian, Pro AA Condi RINO Rice because she CAN WIN!

(Sarcasm/)
258 posted on 01/15/2004 2:25:21 PM PST by Pubbie (* Bill Owens 2008 *)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Salgak
Guilani is good on defense and leadership as well as other issues like crime, but dead wrong on abortion and gun control, and thus dead wrong on the Constitution. What kind of judges would he appoint? Sorry, because he would be a good candidate, but I would have trouble voting for him.

Rice, if she could get herself elected as governor somewhere first, could be a terrific candidate, but she has the same issues problem as Guilani. Pro-choice (even if "reluctantly") and pro-AA on race, so also weak on the Constitution and unlikely to appoint the right kind of judges.

100 senators think that the Senate is the perfect place to learn to be a president, which to me is the perfect reason to NEVER choose someone from the Senate (or the House, for that matter) who has no other qualifications. Can somebody name a great - or even good - president who was elected there from the Senate?

So I tend to look at governors first, followed by the military. Below that, perhaps a cabinet officer (for experience with large issues and organizations) with legislative or very strong business background. And I want to have some answers about how they view issues, particularly issues with Constitutional implications.

I like Jeb Bush. I understand the dynasty issue, but I think he would be on everybody's short list if his name were Jones instead of Bush. I think he has been right on issues, and a forceful leader unafraid to confront his opponents. I also think that he has learned some lessons from watching his brother operate under frightening circumstances.

I also like Bill Owens and George Allen, about equally, and believe that I could happily vote for either of them. Haley Barbour needs to succeed in Mississippi before he could be ready, but that might be coming.

I think that the Bush-Cheney team has redefined the office of Vice President as a true senior executive instead of a "lady in waiting", and it will never be the same again. The Clinton-Gore version was a limp-wristed shadow of what it has become. But it will require a new kind of VP, with the executive competence of a Dick Cheney to carry the load. I do believe that Rice would be up to the task, but it could also go to an appropriate Congressman or Senator with business experience, like Bill Frist. Such an EXECUTIVE VP could be prepared for the presidency, unlike Al Gore.
259 posted on 01/15/2004 2:26:54 PM PST by MainFrame65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob
You're gonna have to change your Freeper name to "President Billybob."

;)
260 posted on 01/15/2004 2:28:14 PM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 441-454 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson