1 posted on
01/13/2004 8:00:06 PM PST by
Pokey78
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: Pokey78
Is there a time when maybe we will actually stop spending? It is getting ridiculous.
2 posted on
01/13/2004 8:01:09 PM PST by
ItisaReligionofPeace
(I'm from the government and I'm here to help.)
To: Pokey78
Bush can just close his eyes and get re-elected. This is great stuff!
To: Pokey78
Our government inaction.
4 posted on
01/13/2004 8:02:37 PM PST by
breakem
To: TheAngryClam
Bush is a Fiscal Conservative Ping.
5 posted on
01/13/2004 8:02:50 PM PST by
ambrose
To: Pokey78
Solving the problems in marriages and the families will go a long way to solving the overall problems in our society.
If there is ANYTHING worth spending money on, IMO, it is this.
6 posted on
01/13/2004 8:06:32 PM PST by
ohioWfan
(BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality - my tagline is unchanged)
To: Pokey78
So, is this money coming out of the Bush family coffers?
To: Pokey78
Dr Wade F. Horn, the assistant secretary of health and human services for children and families:
"This initiative will not force anyone to get or stay married. The last thing we'd want is to increase the rate of domestic violence against women."
In other words, in the most obvious reading of Dr. Horn's own words:
"Marriage, in and of itself, increases domestic violence against women." Not exactly the attitude to have going into a program designed to encourage marriages. Sorry, Mr. Bush, until that mindset is changed a FedGov program to encourage marriage may ruin more than it helps. It's like having the State Department pursue our national interest in foreign policy.
10 posted on
01/13/2004 8:15:43 PM PST by
bvw
To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda ping - marriage defense spending - this article is kind of confusing.
A. Too much spending. Why the heck should the federal gov't get into the counseling business???
B. Beating around the bush - just get the marriage amendment rolling and be done with it.
(IMHO)
If anyone wants on or off this ping list, inform me!
(it's usually a rather busy one)
To: Pokey78
God bless President Bush.
We all need to support this program even if it is with only $5.00 or our encouragement.
12 posted on
01/13/2004 8:26:54 PM PST by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: Pokey78
Will this guy EVER stop spending? My God..every week it's something else!
To: Pokey78
What a freakin' joke.
And this was supposed to be the year that William Jefferson Bush was going to slow down the wild spending.
15 posted on
01/13/2004 8:29:30 PM PST by
Mulder
(Fight the future)
To: Pokey78
For months, administration officials have worked with conservative groups on the proposal, which would provide at least $1.5 billion for training to help couples develop interpersonal skills that sustain "healthy marriages." The proposal is the type of relatively inexpensive but politically potent initiative that appeals to White House officials at a time when they are squeezed by growing federal budget deficits.
"A lot of conservatives are very pleased with the healthy marriage initiative."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Republican government, conservative groups = federal program to teach the people interpersonal skills - on the cheap of course. Aren't you glad the Democrats aren't in control?
22 posted on
01/13/2004 8:38:46 PM PST by
u-89
To: Pokey78
Rarely do government programs actually accomplish their goal. And the unintended consequences are usually worse than the original problem.
The people that will run this programs are the same ones that work in Planned Parenthood. Bureaucrats are specific type of person with a distorted view of the world, and especially these days do more harm than good. They will probably blow most of the money on Superbowl adds.
25 posted on
01/13/2004 8:43:09 PM PST by
microgood
(They will all die......most of them.)
To: Pokey78
I know one of the people quoted in this piece, Wade Horn, "assistant secretary of health and human services for children and families." Cool. I developed and managed his organization's website, fatherhood.org ; I haven't worked on it for a couple of years, so don't blame me if it looks bad now. :-)
On one hand, the family is the foundation of the country. On the other hand, our government is sure spending a lot of our money....
28 posted on
01/13/2004 9:03:01 PM PST by
Theo
To: Pokey78
"Mawwiage"
29 posted on
01/13/2004 9:05:44 PM PST by
Diddle E. Squat
(www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com)
To: Pokey78
My copy of the Constitution doesn't authorize this.
Maybe I've got one of the old, first editions.
30 posted on
01/13/2004 9:07:19 PM PST by
Hank Rearden
(Dick Gephardt. Before he dicks you.)
To: Pokey78
Let's see... 1.5 billion, and of course, no federal program will ever be shut down. I'm sure glad that every Rat in the race is ten times as worse, else I'd be sorely tempted.
34 posted on
01/13/2004 9:16:59 PM PST by
kingu
(Remember: Politicians and members of the press are going to read what you write today.)
To: Pokey78
In the last few years, some liberals have also expressed interest in marriage-education programs. They say a growing body of statistical evidence suggests that children fare best, financially and emotionally, in married two-parent families.
Gosh, libs, ya think? Thanks for coming to the party, oh, about 6 thousand years late...
To: Pokey78
As long as it is conservative social engineering, I am all for it!?
39 posted on
01/13/2004 9:27:33 PM PST by
sixmil
To: Pokey78
This just in.
BRITNEY SPEARS to head coalition !
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson