Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court Nixes Appeal Over 9-11 Detentions
AP news ^ | Jan 12, 2004 | ANNE GEARAN

Posted on 01/12/2004 8:01:26 AM PST by Kaslin

WASHINGTON (AP) - The Supreme Court refused Monday to consider whether the government properly withheld names and other details about hundreds of foreigners detained in the months after the Sept. 11 terror attacks.

The high court turned down a request to review the secrecy surrounding detainees, nearly all Arabs or Muslims, who were picked up in the United States immediately following the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

Many if not most of the more than 700 detainees at issue in the case have since been deported. Some picked up after Sept. 11 were charged with crimes, and others were held as material witnesses. Only Zacarias Moussaoui, who was detained before the Sept. 11 attacks, is being prosecuted in connection with the Sept. 11 attacks.

A Washington study center critical of the Bush administration responses after Sept. 11 sued to learn names and other basic information about the detainees. The appeal raises constitutional questions under the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and legal questions under the federal Freedom of Information Act.

Twenty-three news organizations and media groups, including The Associated Press, joined in asking the high court to hear the case.

"It is the responsibility of courts, and especially this court, to provide meaningful judicial review when the government invokes national security to justify unprecedented secrecy in exercising its awesome power to arrest and detain hundreds of people," lawyers for the Center for National Security Studies argued in a court filing.

"History shows that, in times of crisis and fear, executive officials are prone to overreact, especially in their treatment of minorities in their midst," the appeal said.

The government grabbed people on thin suspicion, then moved to deport detainees who had no demonstrated link to terrorism but who had violated civil immigration laws, lawyers for the Center for National Security Studies told the court.

The government sealed immigration records and omitted detainees' names from jail rosters, among other tactics, to make sure that details of hundreds of arrests remained secret, the lawyers said.

The high court's decision not to review the case represents a victory for the Bush administration. Last week, the high court disappointed the administration by taking on a higher-profile terrorism case involving the rights of an American citizen captured on the battlefield in Afghanistan. The Bush administration had argued strongly that it has authority to hold the man, Yaser Esam Hamdi, indefinitely and without charges in a military prison.

The detainee names case is Center for National Security Studies v. Justice Department, 03-472.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 911detainees; aliens; enemycombatant; scotus
The high court's decision not to review the case represents a victory for the Bush administration.

Good call

1 posted on 01/12/2004 8:01:27 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Rank Location Receipts Donors/Avg Freepers/Avg Monthlies
45 North Dakota 65.00
1
65.00
28
2.32


Thanks for donating to Free Republic!

Move your locale up the leaderboard!

2 posted on 01/12/2004 8:03:33 AM PST by Support Free Republic (Hi Mom! Hi Dad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Given these folks were not citizens, I couldn't agree more. In essence, this is a small victory in the sovereignty battle.

I'm not that big on Pat, Buchanan's views, but this issue of citizenship is under incremental attack by the secularists....just like homosexuality.
3 posted on 01/12/2004 8:06:30 AM PST by gobucks (http://oncampus.richmond.edu/academics/classics/students/Ribeiro/laocoon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Time to MoveOn.
4 posted on 01/12/2004 8:06:55 AM PST by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; nutmeg
Good news!
5 posted on 01/12/2004 8:14:55 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
then moved to deport detainees who had no demonstrated link to terrorism but who had violated civil immigration laws

I think it's great to let the world know that we will deport illegal aliens.
It's a shame that we don't do that with ALL of the illegal aliens.

6 posted on 01/12/2004 9:14:17 AM PST by zx2dragon (I could never again be an angel... Innocence, once lost, can never be regained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zx2dragon
Hey, Akbar. In here. [Clank.]
7 posted on 01/12/2004 9:50:02 AM PST by 50sDad (Hey Vegans! More people were killed this year by dirty onions than by Mad Cows!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson