Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mylroie: Big Error by O'Neill Author on 60 Minutes
Iraq News News Letter - sam11@erols.com | 1-11-04 | Laurie Mylroie

Posted on 01/11/2004 6:24:22 PM PST by Matchett-PI

In his appearance this evening on "60 Minutes," Ron Suskind, author of The Price of Loyalty, based to a large extent on information from former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill, made an astonishing, very serious misstatement.

Suskind claimed he has documents showing that preparations for the Iraq war were well underway before 9-11. He cited--and even showed--what he said was a Pentagon document, entitled, "Foreign Suitors for Iraq Oilfield contracts." He claimed the document was about planning for post-war Iraqi oil (CBS's promotional story also contains that claim): http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/printable592330.shtml

But that is not a Pentagon document. It's from the Vice-President's Office. It was part of the Energy Project that was the focus of Dick Cheney's attention before the 9/11 strikes.

And the document has nothing to do with post-war Iraq. It was part of a study of global oil supplies. Judicial Watch obtained it in a law suit and posted it, along with related documents, on its website at: http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml

Indeed, when this story first broke yesterday, the Drudge Report had the Judicial Watch document linked (no one at CBS News saw that, so they could correct the error, when the show aired?)

And what are we to make of O'Neill's bigger claims, including that the Iraq war was planned from the first days of the Bush administration (cited by Wesley Clark today to buttress his assertion that there was no need for the war, it was all political)?

In late 2000 and early 2001, the Iraqi regime was trying increasingly hard to shoot down US planes enforcing the no-fly zones. That may well have opened up discussion about overthrowing Saddam in January and February 2001, as Suskind claims, but "Iraq News," which followed the issue very closely at the time, doubts very much that any decision was made to do so then. Perhaps tellingly, Suskind doesn't claim that those discussions continued beyond February.

Finally, O'Neill's statement to Time magazine, "I never saw anything that I would characterize as evidence of weapons of mass destruction," is bizarre. From 1995 on, UNSCOM reported that Iraq retained major elements of its proscribed weapons programs. That was the consensual view within the US intelligence community on the eve of the war, as well as every other country engaged in the issue.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: booktour; bush; iraq; lauriemylroie; mylroie; oneill; pauloneill; priceofloyalty; suskind; waronterror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-283 next last
To: Matchett-PI
ooopss bump
221 posted on 01/12/2004 7:01:20 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
I got the first one but not a second (if I'm reading the timing of these correctly)!

222 posted on 01/12/2004 7:10:23 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg
O'Neil's an old fool who was fired for incompetence

***

Maybe he did too many bong hits with Bono.
223 posted on 01/12/2004 7:31:27 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Bump!
224 posted on 01/12/2004 7:32:09 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Bump!
225 posted on 01/12/2004 7:32:09 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Bump!
226 posted on 01/12/2004 7:32:10 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Bump!
227 posted on 01/12/2004 7:32:10 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
bump
228 posted on 01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
bump
229 posted on 01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
bump
230 posted on 01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
bump
231 posted on 01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
bump
232 posted on 01/12/2004 7:34:55 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
You should think about bumping this to doug from upland. :-)
233 posted on 01/12/2004 7:35:46 AM PST by Valin (We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies]

To: Valin; doug from upland
You should think about bumping this to doug from upland. :-)

^^^

Hmm...What a good idea...
234 posted on 01/12/2004 7:37:27 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
235 posted on 01/12/2004 7:38:06 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
236 posted on 01/12/2004 7:38:06 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
237 posted on 01/12/2004 7:38:07 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
238 posted on 01/12/2004 7:38:08 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg
Thanks for the flag, friend.
239 posted on 01/12/2004 7:39:14 AM PST by Bigg Red (Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
I consider myself bumped into submission. Of course, I have been bumping this all along and suggested to the Admin Moderator that it go in breaking news.
240 posted on 01/12/2004 7:40:20 AM PST by doug from upland (Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 281-283 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson