Skip to comments.
Mylroie: Big Error by O'Neill Author on 60 Minutes
Iraq News News Letter - sam11@erols.com
| 1-11-04
| Laurie Mylroie
Posted on 01/11/2004 6:24:22 PM PST by Matchett-PI
In his appearance this evening on "60 Minutes," Ron Suskind, author of The Price of Loyalty, based to a large extent on information from former Secretary of the Treasury Paul O'Neill, made an astonishing, very serious misstatement.
Suskind claimed he has documents showing that preparations for the Iraq war were well underway before 9-11. He cited--and even showed--what he said was a Pentagon document, entitled, "Foreign Suitors for Iraq Oilfield contracts." He claimed the document was about planning for post-war Iraqi oil (CBS's promotional story also contains that claim): http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/printable592330.shtml
But that is not a Pentagon document. It's from the Vice-President's Office. It was part of the Energy Project that was the focus of Dick Cheney's attention before the 9/11 strikes.
And the document has nothing to do with post-war Iraq. It was part of a study of global oil supplies. Judicial Watch obtained it in a law suit and posted it, along with related documents, on its website at: http://www.judicialwatch.org/071703.c_.shtml
Indeed, when this story first broke yesterday, the Drudge Report had the Judicial Watch document linked (no one at CBS News saw that, so they could correct the error, when the show aired?)
And what are we to make of O'Neill's bigger claims, including that the Iraq war was planned from the first days of the Bush administration (cited by Wesley Clark today to buttress his assertion that there was no need for the war, it was all political)?
In late 2000 and early 2001, the Iraqi regime was trying increasingly hard to shoot down US planes enforcing the no-fly zones. That may well have opened up discussion about overthrowing Saddam in January and February 2001, as Suskind claims, but "Iraq News," which followed the issue very closely at the time, doubts very much that any decision was made to do so then. Perhaps tellingly, Suskind doesn't claim that those discussions continued beyond February.
Finally, O'Neill's statement to Time magazine, "I never saw anything that I would characterize as evidence of weapons of mass destruction," is bizarre. From 1995 on, UNSCOM reported that Iraq retained major elements of its proscribed weapons programs. That was the consensual view within the US intelligence community on the eve of the war, as well as every other country engaged in the issue.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Editorial; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: booktour; bush; iraq; lauriemylroie; mylroie; oneill; pauloneill; priceofloyalty; suskind; waronterror; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-283 next last
To: Matchett-PI
ooopss bump
221
posted on
01/12/2004 7:01:20 AM PST
by
finnman69
(cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
To: Peach
I got the first one but not a second (if I'm reading the timing of these correctly)!
222
posted on
01/12/2004 7:10:23 AM PST
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Wolfgang_Blitzkrieg
O'Neil's an old fool who was fired for incompetence
***
Maybe he did too many bong hits with Bono.
223
posted on
01/12/2004 7:31:27 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: doug from upland
Bump!
224
posted on
01/12/2004 7:32:09 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: doug from upland
Bump!
225
posted on
01/12/2004 7:32:09 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: doug from upland
Bump!
226
posted on
01/12/2004 7:32:10 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: doug from upland
Bump!
227
posted on
01/12/2004 7:32:10 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: OldFriend
bump
228
posted on
01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: OldFriend
bump
229
posted on
01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: OldFriend
bump
230
posted on
01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: OldFriend
bump
231
posted on
01/12/2004 7:34:53 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: OldFriend
bump
232
posted on
01/12/2004 7:34:55 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Bigg Red
You should think about bumping this to doug from upland. :-)
233
posted on
01/12/2004 7:35:46 AM PST
by
Valin
(We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.)
To: Valin; doug from upland
You should think about bumping this to doug from upland. :-)
^^^
Hmm...What a good idea...
234
posted on
01/12/2004 7:37:27 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
235
posted on
01/12/2004 7:38:06 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
236
posted on
01/12/2004 7:38:06 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
237
posted on
01/12/2004 7:38:07 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Valin; doug from upland
bump
238
posted on
01/12/2004 7:38:08 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: nutmeg
Thanks for the flag, friend.
239
posted on
01/12/2004 7:39:14 AM PST
by
Bigg Red
(Never again trust Democrats with national security!)
To: Bigg Red
I consider myself bumped into submission. Of course, I have been bumping this all along and suggested to the Admin Moderator that it go in breaking news.
240
posted on
01/12/2004 7:40:20 AM PST
by
doug from upland
(Don't wait until it is too late to stop Hillary -- do something today!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220, 221-240, 241-260 ... 281-283 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson