Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MEXICAN NEWSPAPER (El Sol de Mexico) Front Page: "USA To Offer Visas to 8 Million Illegals"
El Sol de Mexico (in Spanish) ^ | 7 January 2004 | El Sol de Mexico (Daily)

Posted on 01/07/2004 8:47:28 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo

Front Page of Mexican Daily Newspaper "El Sol de Mexico"

Headline: "U.S.A. To Offer Visas to 8 Million Illegals"

January 4, 2004

The link to the full article is above, in Spanish. Somebody might wish to Babelfish/translate it.

The subheads are, as translated in English: "Bush Announces Migratory Plan...Offer is to 8 Million Illegals...by Carmen Flores, Correspondent"

The first paragraph:

(From original Spanish) "President Bush of the United States has decided in a migratory plan which will result in in temporary employment for three years for 8 million illegal (immigrants), the majority of whom come from Mexico. This plan needs to be approved by the US Congress."

(Excerpt) Read more at elsoldemexico.com.mx ...


TOPICS: Australia/New Zealand; Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Cuba; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Germany; Government; Israel; Japan; Mexico; Russia; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; 8million; aliens; amnestia; amnesty; borders; custom; debate; election; fox; illegals; immigrantlist; jorgeabustos; language; law; lawbreakers; mexico; rove; undocumented; visas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: Isolationist
"I'm not a 1 issue person"

ha ha ha

yet from an earlier post:

"This cements it for me – I'm not voting for Bush. Other than the War on Terror – what has GWB done that can be considered conservative?"

So abortion isn't your one issue - but immigration is? I pointed out a bunch of things unrelated to WOT or abortion, such as general deregulation and reversal of Clinton policies, ending the ABM treaty against loud opposition, privatisation, putting the screws to the ABA, and most importantly, appointing solidly conservative judges.

BTW, I live in Arizona, a border state. I see the impact of illegal immigration every day. The status quo is simply not working. I'm willing to entertain other ideas, and withhold judgement until the President actually presents a plan, as opposed to the media echo chamber of what this is supposed to contain. Remember the noise a few weekends ago about expectation of Bush announcing a manned Mars mission? Never happened. Anyhow,

I'm certain I'd like Bush's solution, even if imperfect, much better than Dean's.
41 posted on 01/07/2004 11:16:59 AM PST by adam_az (Be vewy vewy qwiet, I'm hunting weftists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
"The Reagan amnesty was about giving out Green Cards. This is about giving out 3 year work permits.

They will marry....they will make babies.....and they will NEVER leave. Look at history.


42 posted on 01/07/2004 11:33:26 AM PST by international american (support our troops.........revoke Hillary's visa!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: international american
They will marry....they will make babies.....and they will NEVER leave. Look at history.

The entire issue of anchor babies needs to be addressed at some point. In Europe, if a Turkish guest worker has a kid while living in Germany, that kid is not automatically a German citizen.

Although the XIVth Amendment seems to address the issue, the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause raises the question in my minds of whether just anybody born on U.S. soil is, by Constitutional right, automatically a U.S. citizen.

For example, if the XIVth Amendment meant that anybody born on U.S. soil is automatically a U.S. citizen, then why was the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924 ever required?

43 posted on 01/07/2004 12:08:51 PM PST by Polybius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: adam_az
Yes – I'm not a 1-issue person. But it's been a compounding of issues that GWB has been weak on and the final nail is his desire to legalize the illegals.

But lets tackle 1 issue at a time based upon your list: deregulation... deregulation of what? There is no mention of deregulation of anything on your list. 2 of the 4 issues E.O. that Bush overturned were about abortion. The other two –"ergonomitics" was a fad bill that was pretty much dead by the time Bush overturned it and saying that Clinton's CO2 rules were choking off all of the electricity surplus to California is a simple explanation at best.

The ABM treaty – that treaty has been and always will be a joke. Neither us nor the Russians really honored that treaty. 1983 we started the SDI program and some variation of the program has been in every administration since Reagan. Privatisation?? – of what? Medicare? – let's be honest after the stock market crash we haven't heard much about privatising medicare. The ABA – he didn't kill the ABA on their influence in judge recommendation – the ABA still has as much pull as they did before. Judicial appointments – if GWB keeps pushing a liberal agenda no matter how conservative a judge maybe – you will still have liberal laws they need to enforce.

And I live in California – so what's your point about living in Arizona? Yes the status quo isn't work – but your solution is since they are here lets just legalize them? That seems to be GWB solution.
44 posted on 01/07/2004 12:31:25 PM PST by Isolationist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Count me in as considering the Constitution Party in 2004 or whatever. This did it.

Bush had my support for reelection from 12 September 2001 until 7 January 2004. Almost 2 1/2 years, gained from an initial position of non-support.

But this issue, and the whole dishonesty and outrage of it all, pushed my patience over the line. So help me, I'll split the ticket this one if I have to, but first I'll see if the local GOP Congressman is also on board with Bush/Rove, and if so, it will be even a more split ticket in 2004.

Gotta go now and edit my FR Personal Profile page on this one.

45 posted on 01/07/2004 12:36:11 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
It wasn't my thought, but Rush Limbaugh's today (by the way, he was LIVID about this!), and he said:

OK, so the MASSIVE majority of Californians say NO DRIVERS LICENSES for ILLEGAL ALIENS, and the legislature rescinds said legislation.

Then Bush comes along and says "Illegal Aliens can stay if they prove they have work."

OK. So, how do they get to work?

They have to DRIVE. (In most cases).

And to DRIVE, they have to have licenses.

However, THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF PEOPLE IN THE VARIOUS STATES WILL NOT STAND FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS GETTING DRIVERS LICENSES.

So help me, this is the achilles heel. On the state level EVERYWHERE people have to get behind laws to forbid Illegal Aliens Drivers Licenses. What's Bush going to do, override it on the Federal level, or seek to have it declared "unconstitutional" under the "equal protection clause"?

These stupid people in the White House never thought about that part, I suppose.

I heard Bush talking this skank today, with the reference..."this system will allow them to then go on and get the documentation that the rest of us have but take for granted daily." He is talking "Drivers Licenses!" I say we force his hand on this and force it good and hard.

46 posted on 01/07/2004 12:47:26 PM PST by AmericanInTokyo (I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Rewarding criminals is insane.
47 posted on 01/07/2004 12:51:50 PM PST by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
My immediate reaction, which I am sure is totally unacceptable, is to start shooting or give up. Until and unless the American people revolt, we are completely screwed. We are now making a giant leap towards bringing this country down to the lowest common denominator. Why not just hang a sign at the borders that reads, "come on in. America is free to everyone except Americans."
48 posted on 01/07/2004 1:03:47 PM PST by sweetliberty (Even the smallest person can change the course of the future. - (LOTR))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lady Eileen
Couldn't agree with you more. So now we will be part of mexico?
Why not just move the map over to include it? Remember the Alamo!
49 posted on 01/07/2004 2:43:59 PM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
" The Reagan amnesty was about giving out Green Cards. This is about giving out 3 year work permits."

And after he gets re-elected it will be about green cards.
50 posted on 01/07/2004 4:01:03 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
Also...what do you think that people that entered the country illegally are suddenly going to go home after 3 years. Dissapear is more like it. Think about it.
51 posted on 01/07/2004 4:02:11 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
" The entire issue of anchor babies needs to be addressed at some point."

Go read the terror thead. The muslims are saying they are sending there women over here to have babys and then head home with US citizens who will be trained as terroists and sent back to the us. It is a take over shceme for them.
52 posted on 01/07/2004 4:04:09 PM PST by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Revel
This is another reason why the 14th Amendment must be ratified to read that either parent must be a US citizen in order for that child to get US citizenship.
53 posted on 01/07/2004 4:16:06 PM PST by Isolationist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Last night I was trying to read what the Mexican take on this was.

I think they're more in the know about this than the American people.

54 posted on 01/07/2004 4:26:32 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ken5050
the mere fact that W proposed it might be enough to get Fox re-elected in Mexico...

They only get one 6 year term. The front runner right how for the PAN candidate is ---- Mrs. Fox --- Marta --- his wife of 2 years. Hmmmmm.

55 posted on 01/07/2004 4:28:16 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Revel
Also...what do you think that people that entered the country illegally are suddenly going to go home after 3 years.

Three years is more than enough time to give birth to a few babies. Those babies will be citizens and qualify for every welfare program there is --- a nice subsidy for those low wages they'll expect to be given.

56 posted on 01/07/2004 4:30:00 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: gubamyster
bttt
57 posted on 01/08/2004 3:10:30 AM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lainde
bttt
58 posted on 01/09/2004 12:48:13 AM PST by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson