1 posted on
12/29/2003 6:17:39 AM PST by
Alissa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: Alissa
Alissa --
Don't YOU have a point of your own to make here?
Do you agree or disagree with this pap?
2 posted on
12/29/2003 6:20:50 AM PST by
Zechariah11
(so they weighed for my hire thirty pieces of silver Zech 11:12)
To: Alissa
"he and his lawyers are accusing prosecutors and other members of the law enforcement community of concocting a vast, politically motivated conspiracy against him.
Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense."
This guy person a short memory or wasn't paying attention when Hillary mouthed off.
3 posted on
12/29/2003 6:21:03 AM PST by
Rebelbase
(If I stay on-topic for more than 2 posts, call 911, because something is wrong.)
To: Alissa
Come back, Alissa. Don't run away. Stay. Talk.
4 posted on
12/29/2003 6:23:08 AM PST by
Zechariah11
(so they weighed for my hire thirty pieces of silver Zech 11:12)
To: Alissa
Walk a mile in his shoes Alissa. When you finish you MIGHT have a different opinion.
6 posted on
12/29/2003 6:23:52 AM PST by
grannyc
To: Alissa
"Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense."Oh, no, liberals never spew such nonsense. Hillary never claimed there was a vast right wing conspiracy committed to taking down her husband, the treasonous liar.
8 posted on
12/29/2003 6:24:42 AM PST by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: Alissa
So if I drive 60 in a 55 at any point in my life, I cannot complain about a person driving 100 in a school zone.
9 posted on
12/29/2003 6:24:49 AM PST by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: Alissa
Dems would be well within their rights to go after gusto against Rush... within certain sane limits.
Giving immunity to drug pushers in order to nail a drug user is NOT within sane parameters. That's bloody unheard of. It's not their -intent- to nail Rush that's "politically motivated" (that would be understandable), it's their willingness to employ overwhelmingly unusual and obviously partisan methods to do so.
Qwinn
10 posted on
12/29/2003 6:26:17 AM PST by
Qwinn
To: Alissa
It seems that all elitists, on both sides of the aisle, only truly become anti-tyranny when it is their own ass that is put in the sling and they see what the common folk have to put up from the government every single day.
To: Alissa
What hypocritical mindless whinning drivel from the left....if it is a LIBERAL who is the addict, they praise the "courage" of the addict as he enters rehab for the 15th time...if it is a conservative who ADMITTS to being addicted and blames NO ONE BUT HIMSELF, and THEN points out that there IS some politcal motivation behind HOW the authorities are handling his case (EVEN THE ACLU ACKNOWLEDGES that RUSH's privacy rights are being trampled on), then the left begins to HOWL and point fingers....
The left is the home of HATE and hypocrisy.
To: Alissa
If they're going to go after Rush, they should also go after Hollywood actors and actresses. The only place we hear much about their addictions is on episodes of "Where are they now?".
20 posted on
12/29/2003 6:28:41 AM PST by
#3Fan
To: Alissa
Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense.
How quickly they forget the Clintons, James Carville and Ken Star.
To: Alissa
What a crock.
27 posted on
12/29/2003 6:32:54 AM PST by
veronica
(Monterey County Film Commission Screenwriting Contest /ATTN:FR writers/FReepmail me)
To: Alissa
Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense.They can't help lying, can they? A liberal's very FIRST response is to ALWAYS claim that it is politically motivated.
28 posted on
12/29/2003 6:34:07 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Alissa
I guess it doesn't take must to be a journalist.
31 posted on
12/29/2003 6:35:21 AM PST by
Vision
To: Alissa
Limbaugh used to defend the legal system - and he used to ridicule citizens who claimed that their constitutional rights had been violated by police and prosecutors.This statement just goes to show you that this cretin doesn't listen to Rush and is just making up crap to feed to his useful idiot audience.
32 posted on
12/29/2003 6:36:02 AM PST by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Alissa; ConservativeMan55
The people who have been hunting for someone to host a new left-wing radio talk show may have found their man. Groan....
To: Alissa
>>...Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense...<<
Hmmm...Hillary's "Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy" comments come to mind.
35 posted on
12/29/2003 6:37:33 AM PST by
FReepaholic
(Never Forget: www.september-11-videos.com)
To: Alissa
For some perspective: The St. Pete Times would consider Nikita Kruschev to be a right-winger.
37 posted on
12/29/2003 6:41:24 AM PST by
capt. norm
(BEER It's not just for breakfast anymore.)
To: Alissa
Now that the once conservative commentator finds himself on the wrong side of a police investigation, he and his lawyers are accusing prosecutors and other members of the law enforcement community of concocting a vast, politically motivated conspiracy against him.
Not even the most linguini-spined liberal would have the gall to spew such irresponsible nonsense.
Not when the Clintons had someone like Janet Reno flacking for them. Though in this case Rush didn't say anything about a "vast" conspiracy against him. But it's evident, given the facts, that there have been political motivations at the bottom of choosing to pursue a rather minor thing by letting those guilty of major crime (blackmail/extortion) off the hook in exchange for their help.
51 posted on
12/29/2003 6:58:03 AM PST by
aruanan
To: Alissa
I support Rush BUT hasn't even he said himself
"IF you haven't nothing to hide then what's the problem?"
or words to that effect.
54 posted on
12/29/2003 7:02:32 AM PST by
WKB
(3!~ A fine is a tax for doing wrong.; A tax is a fine for doing well.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson