Skip to comments.
MIRACLE OF BAGHDAD
New York Post ^
| 12/29/03
| NILES LATHEM
Posted on 12/29/2003 1:15:10 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:18:03 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
December 29, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Startling new Army statistics show that strife-torn Baghdad - considered the most dangerous city in the world - now has a lower murder rate than New York.
The newest numbers, released by the Army's 1st Infantry Division, reveal that over the past three months, murders and other crimes in Baghdad are decreasing dramatically and that in the month of October, there were fewer murders per capita there than the Big Apple, Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: baghdad; bang; iraq; murderrate; nyc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
1
posted on
12/29/2003 1:15:10 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
ping
2
posted on
12/29/2003 1:15:44 AM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
B-b-b-b-but this just can't be. NYC and Washington D.C. have strict gun control whereas every Iraqi male is allowed to own an assault rifle!
3
posted on
12/29/2003 1:22:57 AM PST
by
Stultis
To: kattracks
A considerable achievement indeed, given that Iraq had to endure a ferocious dictatorship until 2003, which generally leads to looting sprees, murders and all kinds of vendettas...
All in all, a great success for US, coalition and Iraqi forces. Soon the insurgents will feel the winds of change, too, as more and more people will no longer be afraid of them.
To: Stultis
Seriously? They have gun rights? I remember the Brits were trying to gobble up guns in the city they controlled. I hope you are right. Gun rights are best for the long term. FReegards....
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Seriously? They have gun rights? Well, I should say last I knew, from a few months ago, this was a Coalition Provisional Authority ruling. I forget if it was one AK-47 per adult or one per family, but the idea was that they were necessary for people to protect themselves. You'll remember that AKs were being fired in the streets of Baghdad to celebrate the capture of Saddam. So far I haven't heard of any attempts to seize them. Of course explosives and RPGs are forbidden.
6
posted on
12/29/2003 2:11:57 AM PST
by
Stultis
To: Molly Pitcher
Ping!
7
posted on
12/29/2003 2:28:56 AM PST
by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(...And second prize goes to Kenny, for his Edward James Olmos impersonation!)
To: Stultis
This article confirms what I have said a few times on FR. There are more terrorists on the streets of our cities than in Iraq. It is not confined to the cities either, as it is becoming common in some of the rural areas. A rapist or child molester is as evil as a Sadaam or Osama. Yet, we turn them out on the streets with a slap on the wrist. Through most of our history, rape was considered a capital crime, the same as murder. Now it is considered a minor felony or in some cases a misdemeanor. It is no mystery why we have so many child molestations and rapes.
8
posted on
12/29/2003 2:32:45 AM PST
by
meenie
(Remember the Alamo! Alamo! One more time. Alamo!!!)
To: kattracks
By contrast, New York's murder rate is seven murders per 100,000 people, Los Angeles' murder rate is 17 per 100,000, and Chicago's is 22, Lott said, citing FBI crime statistics. Chicago worse than LA? I never would've thunk it. The spirit of the midwestern gangsters lives on I guess.
9
posted on
12/29/2003 3:05:51 AM PST
by
#3Fan
To: Arthur Wildfire! March; Stultis
Seriously? They have gun rights?One 7.62mm (or lesser calibre) rifle per household. (AK-47s, fully automatic, are OK) 12.7/14.5 mm machine guns are a no-no.
To: kattracks
It might be because the biggest murderer has been caught in a spider hole, and the other two are already dead.
11
posted on
12/29/2003 4:25:03 AM PST
by
chainsaw
To: kattracks
The newest numbers, released by the Army's 1st Infantry Division, reveal that over the past three months, murders and other crimes in Baghdad are decreasing dramatically and that in the month of October, there were fewer murders per capita there than the Big Apple, Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C. Guess the Bush administration had a postwar plan after all. Dean, Kerry, Gephardt et al. simply weren't bright enough or too self-interested to figure it out. One thing is certain: If Gore or any of them had been president, there would indeed have been a quagmire. That experience they have.
12
posted on
12/29/2003 5:03:46 AM PST
by
OESY
To: Stultis
It will be interesting to see if this is reported by ABCNBCCBSWashingtonPostNewYorkTimes.
If so, theyll spin this that MORE restrictive gun laws are needed in the US.
To: boxerblues; mystery-ak
Funny. The only thing I heard on the networks yesterday was that we lost more troops in Iraq recently than we did during the spring. Gotta love our objective media!
14
posted on
12/29/2003 5:18:51 AM PST
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: kattracks; MJY1288; Calpernia; Grampa Dave; anniegetyourgun; Ernest_at_the_Beach; BOBTHENAILER; ...
Thanks, kattracks.(^:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
December 29, 2003 -- WASHINGTON - Startling new Army statistics show that strife-torn Baghdad - considered the most dangerous city in the world - now has a lower murder rate than New York.
The newest numbers, released by the Army's 1st Infantry Division....murders and other crimes in Baghdad are decreasing dramatically and that in the month of October, there were fewer murders per capita there than the Big Apple, Chicago, Los Angeles and Washington, D.C.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Our ally (and pain in the side of the left) John Lott, and the 1st Armored Division in Bagdhad agree ~ crime is down in Baghdad.
Good ammo for responding to those who have used numbers to undermine our efforts.
Then, please pray for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan who are in harm's way. They know our enemies.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
15
posted on
12/29/2003 6:02:46 AM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
( "Our military is full of the finest people on the face of the earth." ~ Pres. Bush, Baghdad)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Thanks for the Ping.......
This will stir up some words in the JAX message boards.
16
posted on
12/29/2003 6:14:46 AM PST
by
OXENinFLA
(And would someone get these Tribbles off the bridge.)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Bump!
To: Arthur Wildfire! March
I don't know what all the rules are, but I've seen groups of armed men in civilian attire making what looks like impromptu check points on the highway (Tribute Money?). AK's and machine guns. In the open.
18
posted on
12/29/2003 8:32:12 AM PST
by
Eagle Eye
( Saddam-Who's your Bagh-Daddy now?)
To: Ragtime Cowgirl
Miracle of Baghdad ~ Bump!
Be Well ~ Be Armed ~ Be Safe ~ Molon Labe!
19
posted on
12/29/2003 8:45:00 AM PST
by
blackie
To: kattracks
Yes the Americans allowed people to retain their small arms. The Brits were trying to take them away, which figures, given their track record on guns.
The point though is that allowing people to retain personal firearms for 'their protection' is a lot better than what the anti-gun nuts would like to do in this country.
20
posted on
12/29/2003 9:53:05 AM PST
by
vladog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson