To: HighWheeler
"Why doesn't FR require a newbie to post 25 responses before allowing the person to post a thread?"
Great suggestion.
1,369 posted on
12/29/2003 11:21:49 PM PST by
Chu Gary
(USN Intel guy 1967 - 1970)
To: Chu Gary
Not a bad idea.
I think there should be some time frame involved to allow a person to first get a feel for the site.
I wonder if there is a way they and Jim could make a newbie have maybe 100 responses, 15 separate logged in visits over at least a month before posting.
First, more will understand it is a privilege and not a right to post here.
Secondly, it would make it a lot more work for an impostor of DU type to get satisfaction of any kind.
Plus mostly it would cut down on the work an administrator has to do I would think.
I think you make a great point.
PS, some don't decide to post articles or vanities much anyway. I don't think I've created more than two myself ever. Others might have thousands in just one year.
1,372 posted on
12/29/2003 11:35:06 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Chu Gary
Did Adam and Eve have navels?
1,373 posted on
12/29/2003 11:36:16 PM PST by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: Chu Gary
Because then trolls would post 25 comments (generally "btt!") really quickly before posting articles. It wouldn't stop them, and would frustrate the well-intentioned newbie poster.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson