Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pro-Gay Chicago Catholic Priests Send Open Letter Ripping "Vile and Toxic" Rhetoric of the Vatican
Catholic Citizens of Illinois ^ | 12/22/2003 | Shamus Toomey

Posted on 12/23/2003 8:18:05 AM PST by marshmallow

Saying they can no longer remain silent, a group of Chicago area Catholic pastors denounced what they say is "vile and toxic" language from the Vatican aimed at gays and lesbians.

The group of nearly two dozen priests from parishes in Chicago and the suburbs sent a scathing "open letter" to church officials Friday. In it, the pastors blasted recent church pronouncements regarding gays as "divisive and exclusionary" and "increasingly violent and abusive."

"As priests and pastors we are speaking out to make clear that our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters are all members of God's family, brothers and sisters in the Lord Jesus and deserving of the same dignity and respect owed any human being," the letter stated.

The group singled out Vatican documents that use language referring to homosexual acts and gay marriage as "intrinsically disordered," "a troubling moral and social phenomenon" and "harmful to the proper development of society." Such language is driving gays from the church, the pastors said.

Cardinal Francis George received a copy of the letter Friday and issued what he acknowledged was a rare response.

"The church speaks, in moral and doctrinal issues, a philosophical and theological language in a society that understands, at best, only psychological and political terms," George wrote in a letter to the pastors.

"Our language is exact, but it does not help us in welcoming men and women of homosexual orientation," he wrote. "It can seem lacking in respect. This is a pastoral problem and a source of anxiety for me as it is for you. It would be good to discuss together."

But George went on to say that pastors must "mediate the tension between welcoming people and calling them to change."

If "you cannot resolve that tension between welcoming people as they are and still calling them to leave their sinfulness and become saints, or if you yourself do not accept the Church's moral teaching on the moral use of the gift of sexuality, it would be all the more important for us to talk," he wrote.

###

The Open Letter is as follows:

PRESS RELEASE:

Catholic Pastors to Bishops: Treat Gays and Lesbians More Pastorally, Berwyn, Illinois, Friday, December 19, 2003.

23 Roman Catholic pastors today released, "An Open Letter to the Hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church Regarding the Pastoral Care of Gay and Lesbian Persons".

Concerned over the increasingly violent and abusive language used by certain Church officials when addressing issues pertaining to homosexuals, the signers of the Open Letter call on all bishops to treat gays and lesbians with greater pastoral sensitivity. Rooted in gospel justice which demands equal respect for each human person, the letter asks the bishops to enter into earnest dialogue with gay and lesbian Catholics instead of talking at them.

The signers invite all who agree with the Open Letter to uplicate it, sign it and send it to their pastor, bishop, Bishop¹s Conference or the Vatican. One of the signers, Rev. Richard J. Prendergast, pastor of St. Mary of Celle parish in Berwyn, said, "Especially at this time of the year, the Church family needs to model welcoming and sensitive behavior towards all family members. Too many families with gay and lesbian sons and daughters have been torn apart. As members of the Church our primary concern has to be strengthening family ties, not creating greater distance between members. Although the tone of public discourse by many politicians and in many television and radio shows has become harsh and intolerant, we must take every step possible to contain that intolerance and hatred and keep it from polluting our homes and our hearts."

Full text of Open Letter can be downloaded at: www.stmaryofcelle.org

Full text of Open Letter follows:

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE HIERARCHY OF THE ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH REGARDING THE PASTORAL CARE OF GAY AND LESBIAN PERSONS

As Catholic pastors, we have become increasingly disturbed by the tone and, in some cases, content of documents and statements from the Vatican, bishops¹ conferences and individual bishops on issues categorized under the heading of "homosexual" or "gay/lesbian." We respect the teaching authority of the Church. Because of this, we find particularly troubling the increase in the use of violent and abusive language directed at any human person. Such language is inappropriate. This is especially so when addressing members of the community of the faithful.

These divisive and exclusionary statements from the Church are contrary to sound pastoral practice.

The life journey in faith is unique and sacred, including the personal integration of sexuality and spirituality. Condemnations leveled at sincere Catholics attempting to make sense out of their journey are inappropriate and pastorally destructive.

As priests and pastors we are speaking out to make clear that our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters are all members of God¹s family, brothers and sisters in the Lord Jesus and deserving of the same dignity and respect owed any human being. Recognition of the inalienable dignity of the human person is the only path toward justice and reconciliation. We affirm the goodness of all homosexual persons. We root ourselves in the U.S. Bishops¹ statement "Always Our Children." Additionally, we re-affirm the understanding of the goodness of the human person as put forth throughout the papacy of Pope John Paul II. Further, we want to state clearly that ministering to and with our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters is mutually beneficial, as is all ministerial activity. Pre-judging where any believer¹s journey will take them is inappropriate. Walking with them, as we do with our heterosexual brothers and sisters, is the appropriate Christian response.

In the recent past, individual bishops, bishops¹ conferences and the Vatican have assumed a tone of such violence and abusiveness toward these sons and daughters of the Church, we can no longer remain silent. Has any other group of people within the Body of Christ been so assaulted and violated by such mean-spirited language? Examples from the most recent Vatican document show all too clearly the demonization of these children of God, referring to homosexuality as a "troubling moral and social phenomenon," "a serious depravity," "the spread of the phenomenon," "approval or legalization of evil," "grave detriment to the common good," "harmful to the proper development of human society," "intrinsically disordered."

Does anyone consider this vile and toxic language invitational?

For many gay and lesbian Catholics, this most recent series of attacks has forced them, out of self-respect and self-love, to withdraw from active participation in the Church and question how they can remain members of a Church they experience as abusive. It is not possible to minister to and with the needs of our homosexual brothers and sisters with language of his tone as a foundation.

The Catholic Church is most catholic when it is inclusive and embracing, and least reflective of the gospel of Jesus when it is exclusive and rigid. For this reason, we also want to affirm the many pastoral and positive statements by certain bishops and bishops¹ conferences (e.g. "Always Our Children").

The Church¹s theology, including her moral teaching, is always in dialogue with the broader lived experience of her members, which shapes and rearticulates the ancient deposit of faith. We encourage a new atmosphere of openness to dialogue which includes the lived experience of many Catholic members. We recognize the blessings of countless homosexuals in a variety of relationships. We believe their experiences must be listened to respectfully.

While we do not know the reasons for the increasingly violent and abusive language, we deplore it as ministers of the gospel of Jesus Christ and ask that it stop immediately. Furthermore, we request that all those in official positions of teaching authority in the Church refrain from any more statements directed AT the gay and lesbian members of the Body of Christ, and instead begin an earnest dialogue WITH those same members of the Body of Christ.

For our part, we pledge to treat all who seek to continue their faith journey with us with respect and dignity, regardless of their sexual orientation.

We join the countless men and women, heterosexual and homosexual, who seek justice, mercy and compassion in and through the Catholic Church.

We extend an invitation all who share our concern to duplicate this letter, sign it, and send it to their pastor, local bishop, National Bishop¹s Conference or the Vatican.

(Parish names are listed for identification purposes only.)

Rev. David Baldwin

St. Benedict the African-East

Chicago, IL

Rev. Daniel Cassidy

St. Mark

Chicago, IL

Rev. Dennis Condon

St. Marcelline

Schaumburg, IL

Rev. Lloyd Cunningham, S.V.D.

Catholic Theological Union

Chicago, IL

Rev. Nicholas Desmond

St. Aloysius

Chicago, IL

Rev. Brian Fischer

St. Gregory the Great

Chicago, IL

Rev. Donald Headley

St. Mary of the Woods

Chicago, IL

Rev. Robert P. Heinz

St. Alphonsus Liguori

Prospect Heights, IL

Rev. Michael Herman

St. Sylvester

Chicago, IL

Rev. Thomas Hickey

St. Clement

Chicago, IL

Rev. John Hoffman

St. Teresa of Avila

Chicago, IL

Rev. Richard Homa

Sacred Heart

Palos Hills, IL

Rev. Terry Johnson

St. Francis Xavier

LaGrange, IL

Rev. Patrick Lee

Immaculate Conception

Chicago, IL

Rev. Robert McLaughlin

Mary Seat of Wisdom

Park Ridge, IL

Rev. Dennis O¹Neill

St. Martha

Morton Grove, IL

Rev. Thomas Pelton

Maternity BVM

Chicago, IL

Rev. Richard Prendergast

St. Mary of Celle

Berwyn, IL

Rev. Michael Shanahan

St. Mark

Chicago, IL

Rev. William J. Stenzel

St. Francis Xavier

LaGrange, IL

Rev. Patrick Tucker

St. Bernardine

Forest Park, IL

Rev. Daniel Whiteside

St. Catherine of Siena/St. Lucy

Oak Park, IL

Rev. Bart Winters

St. Gregory the Great

Chicago, IL

(CCI NOTES: Several of the pastors on this list are known to be homosexuals themselves. It's hard to determine whether their impudent letter is more offensive, or the fact that as known homosexuals they are allowed to continue in their parishes impersonating "priests.")


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: catholiclist; chicago; lavendermafia; queerlifestyles; sin; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last
To: sgtbono2002
Inquisition? Why not? We dont have to burn anyone at the stake , but a few good Excommunications seem to be in order.

Absolutely. We'd not allow a gay person in our church except as an observer.

41 posted on 12/23/2003 9:18:22 AM PST by biblewonk (I must try to answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Although it disgusts me that he should publicly humor these people, he may well be right that they should be given a chance to explain themselves and repent. While it is likely that the majority of these priests have acted maliciously in going public this way, it's barely possible that some of them may have been strung along and gotten in over their heads.

Cardinal George agrees with them that the language of the Church can often be a pastoral problem, so he is unlikely to discipline them at all.

Those who are unrepentant should be relieved of their duties.

Unrepetant of what? Recognizing that the Church's approach is not working?

42 posted on 12/23/2003 9:19:47 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
So, would you support a return of the Inquisition? Or would you then condemn the papists for being too authoritarian?

The Inquisition was too authoritarian. The present RC heirarchy has, apparently, no authority. The correct approach would be the -- gulp -- BIBLICAL ONE, which is to appoint pastors of a certain moral character.

I suppose the RC bishops are too busy contemplating the fecund glories of the magisterium to just do what St. Paul says in black ink.

In my denomination, imperfect as it is, these two dozen clergy would have been removed the day after they signed the letter. Without needing an Inquisitor to get it done.

43 posted on 12/23/2003 9:22:23 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
At long last, a straight answer. Sort of.

Thank you.
44 posted on 12/23/2003 9:22:49 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: biblewonk
Just looking for a small touch of truth from RC's who so often call everyone else "schizmatics" while claiming unity.

There have always been schismatics and heretics arising within the Catholic Church. No reasonable person wold claim otherwise. We could list the major heresies which have arisen. It has happened since the inception and will continue until the end of time. St. Paul speaks of it at length and makes it clear that it is a fact of spiritual life.

The "unity" which is often spoken of is the unity with the successor of St. Peter and the assurance that God will work through his teaching. However, people have free will and on occasion will choose to reject the truth. Unfortunately for the Church, in recent years it has continued to shelter such people within her bosom.

45 posted on 12/23/2003 9:23:40 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
Joseph Cardinal Bernardin, formerly Archbishop of Chicago, was probably the single most malign influence on the Catholic Church in America.

I believe you underestimate the damage that Cardianl Maderios and Cushing did in preparing the way for the "Lavendar Mafia" to attain power!

Boston archdioscese is comparable to the orifice these gay Priests in Chicago prefer. Need proof...look into the close relations that Cushing had with the Klu Kennedy Klan...especially the annulment of JFK's 1st marriage!

46 posted on 12/23/2003 9:24:17 AM PST by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Incorrigible
What we have here, is a failure to excommunicate!

LOL!!! Awesome line!

Cool Hand Jesus BUMP!

47 posted on 12/23/2003 9:25:17 AM PST by Itzlzha (The avalanche has already started...it is too late for the pebbles to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa
Yes - those are the only two choices. Brilliantly thought out.

I have found over the last four years that this is the most common technique of the kiddies. Those adolescents who have reached the age where they can string words together, but are devoid of thought, knowledge, experience or common sense.

I avoid them like the plague. The red flag is a brief (presumably "profound") retort commencing with the word "so".

48 posted on 12/23/2003 9:25:53 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Taliesan
which is to appoint pastors of a certain moral character.

Aye, there's the rub. An Inquisition is too authoritarian, but we need some method of ensuring that we ordain only those of good moral character, and get rid of those whose moral character is proven bad. Sort of like, well...

Sort of like an Inquisition. That doesn't get carried away with itself.

49 posted on 12/23/2003 9:26:27 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Desdemona
In time, as the pope is replacing apostacy with orthodoxy by attrition,

I suppose that is better than nothing. An alternate approach would be to replace apostacy with orthodoxy by fiat.

50 posted on 12/23/2003 9:28:25 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He also said:

If "you cannot resolve that tension between welcoming people as they are and still calling them to leave their sinfulness and become saints, or if you yourself do not accept the Church's moral teaching on the moral use of the gift of sexuality, it would be all the more important for us to talk," he wrote.

In other words, he is implying that these priests may have a problem with Church doctrine.

51 posted on 12/23/2003 9:28:43 AM PST by marshmallow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: marshmallow
The "unity" which is often spoken of is the unity with the successor of St. Peter and the assurance that God will work through his teaching. However, people have free will and on occasion will choose to reject the truth. Unfortunately for the Church, in recent years it has continued to shelter such people within her bosom.

RRRRight.

52 posted on 12/23/2003 9:29:17 AM PST by biblewonk (I must try to answer all bible questions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: expatpat
Got it. And I agree.
53 posted on 12/23/2003 9:30:22 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Roughneck
un-repentant gays have no place in the church - especially not in leadership positions.

Exactly, if they don't like the doctrine they could always go somewhere else that supports them, and be happy, and gay.

forgive the little pun there

54 posted on 12/23/2003 9:31:02 AM PST by biffalobull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He stated that the Church's language often fostered a lack of respect for gays as human beings, and that is a pastoral problem.

No, he didn't.

55 posted on 12/23/2003 9:31:28 AM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Campion
They are distinct from the folks who think that Jews are out to take over the world and rape all the Gentile girls on the way.

Not distinct in their character, you understand, just in the object of their irrational hatred.

In the first sentence I think indistinct works better, but I agree, and that's sorta the point. Old hatreds are hard to overcome. When you can mix truth with hatred, like the history of priests, contrary positions, stale rhetoric and intolerance, you have a much better chance of continuing these prejudices, than if you try the obvious lie of Jews taking over the world to rape the Gentile's. I thought the Jews wanted to eat Gentile babies, not rape the wimmens.

56 posted on 12/23/2003 9:32:23 AM PST by 68 grunt (3/1 India, 3rd, 68-69, 0311)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Itzlzha
I believe you underestimate the damage that Cardianl Maderios and Cushing did in preparing the way for the "Lavendar Mafia" to attain power!

Dearden in Detroit may have been the worst of all.

especially the annulment of JFK's 1st marriage

Do you really mean Teddy, or do you have material for a book here? ;-)

57 posted on 12/23/2003 9:34:22 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
"Our language is exact, but it does not help us in welcoming men and women of homosexual orientation," he wrote. "It can seem lacking in respect. This is a pastoral problem and a source of anxiety for me as it is for you. It would be good to discuss together."

Actually, Knotts, he did.

58 posted on 12/23/2003 9:34:39 AM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ArrogantBustard
I just know you are not this dense.

The Inquisition used force. Somebody on this thread has already yelled about false dichotomy -- well, here is a flaming false dichotomy: either we let homosexuals become priests, or we have to oil up the thumb screw again. Since we'll be criticized for either, we just can't win, it's just so unfair, our critics just can't be satisfied, etc.

Come on. The church has a perfectly BIBLICAL right to examine candidates for the clergy and exclude those not of a certain character, and remove those who exhibit undesirable traits. This has nothing to do with force.

Are you seriously arguing that these gay priests CANNOT BE KEPT OUT OF THE MINISTRY except by something resembling the Inquisition?

59 posted on 12/23/2003 9:36:40 AM PST by Taliesan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If that's what you call respect, then we have no further use for pity.
60 posted on 12/23/2003 9:38:07 AM PST by Old Professer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson