Skip to comments.
(3-judge panel, 9th Circuit) Rules ALL GITMO detainees must have access to an attorney
Fox
Posted on 12/18/2003 11:46:39 AM PST by Dog
AP via Fox news alert..
Lord help us from the judges..
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; courts; detainees; gitmo; jihadinamerica; judges; oligarchy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-323 next last
To: republicanwizard
Only if people are paying attention. Let's hope we can keep this candle lit.
21
posted on
12/18/2003 11:50:33 AM PST
by
sarasota
To: abner
This is amazing... Now the taxpayers get to pay for the defense of terrorists. What a country! Wasn't Ramsey Clark behind this?
22
posted on
12/18/2003 11:50:58 AM PST
by
Mo1
(House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
To: theDentist
It's for the children.............
23
posted on
12/18/2003 11:50:58 AM PST
by
Puppage
(You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
To: RonF
Even less than meaningless. The detainees are on foreign soil outside the reach of the Constitution and the emperor-judges.
24
posted on
12/18/2003 11:50:58 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: So Cal Rocket
It wasn't the 9th Circus... they would have given the GITMO detainees the right to vote. Pell Grants, even.
25
posted on
12/18/2003 11:51:11 AM PST
by
Kenton
(Howard Dean must have some good qualities, the Clinton's can't stand him.)
To: Mo1
Not on foxnews.com yet.
To: steve8714
Still looking..
27
posted on
12/18/2003 11:52:50 AM PST
by
Dog
(First question to Saddam..........Where is Scott Speicher??)
To: Dog
5th Circuit was hearing the case, no?
28
posted on
12/18/2003 11:53:06 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
(The Federal judiciary is a terrorist organization)
To: Dog
It's time to take no prisoners.
To: So Cal Rocket
It wasn't the 9th Circus... they would have given the GITMO detainees the right to vote. And a plot of land in Montana for their troubles.
30
posted on
12/18/2003 11:53:46 AM PST
by
smith288
("We're going to have the happiest Christmas since Bing Crosby tap danced with Danny F'n Kay")
To: thoughtomator
Drudge has it. 9th circuit in SF, CA.
31
posted on
12/18/2003 11:53:56 AM PST
by
wesdale
To: steve8714
Headline up at DRUDGE....it was the 8th Circuit!!!!
32
posted on
12/18/2003 11:53:58 AM PST
by
Dog
(First question to Saddam..........Where is Scott Speicher??)
To: thoughtomator
They said it was the CT Fed Court .. not sure which they are
33
posted on
12/18/2003 11:54:03 AM PST
by
Mo1
(House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
To: Dog
9th Circuit........sorry!
34
posted on
12/18/2003 11:54:31 AM PST
by
Dog
(First question to Saddam..........Where is Scott Speicher??)
To: Dog
Paging Lionel Hutz...
35
posted on
12/18/2003 11:54:47 AM PST
by
Daus
To: Dog
9th circuit? The most over-turned circuit in the country?
36
posted on
12/18/2003 11:56:04 AM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: Mo1
Court Rules Lawyer Access for Detainees
By DAVID KRAVETS
ASSOCIATED PRESS
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal appeals court ruled Thursday for the first time that prisoners held at Guantanamo Naval Base in Cuba should have access to lawyers and the American court system.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' 2-1 decision was a rebuke to the Bush Administration. The administration maintains that because the 660 men held there were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charges or trial.
--
37
posted on
12/18/2003 11:56:08 AM PST
by
Dog
(First question to Saddam..........Where is Scott Speicher??)
To: Dog
Forget that.
Take 'em back to Afghanistan and set up a camp there run by the new government with American assistance.
Let the Afghanis try them one at a time....publicly.
38
posted on
12/18/2003 11:56:20 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Proud of It!)
To: RonF
and what makes you think the terrorists don't have 5 votes on the SCOTUS? They do.
To: Dog
From Drudge
SAN FRANCISCO__9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals' 2-1 decision is rebuke to the Bush Admin. MORE///
The administration maintains that because the 660 men held there were picked up overseas on suspicion of terrorism and are being held on foreign land, they may be detained indefinitely without charges or trial.
I thought I saw FNC mention CT .. I guess they ment COURT and I need to invest in glasses
40
posted on
12/18/2003 11:56:59 AM PST
by
Mo1
(House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 321-323 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson