Skip to comments.
State Department urges non-essential diplomats...
Drudge ^
Posted on 12/17/2003 1:37:22 PM PST by RoughDobermann
and families of American officials to leave Saudi Arabia...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: saudiarabia; statedept; travelwarning; usembassy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
To: kabar
Wonder if it had anything to do with what they found in SH's brief case? Maybe the terrorist are now under pressure to "hurry up their attacks"
81
posted on
12/17/2003 4:48:30 PM PST
by
hoosiermama
(Prayers for all!)
To: Lady Heron
I lived in the Kingdom for five years and dealt with the Saudis on an official level. There are many misconceptions and outright fabrications about the Saudis and our relationship with them. We have important strategic military sales. The Saudis have been very helpful to us in many ways, a number of which can not be made public.
I don't believe Saudi bashing is helpful in advancing our interests. I was in Iran when Carter promoted his human rights policies and the US media was bashing the Shah as corrupt and brutal. Iranian students in the US (there were over 50,000 making them the largest student group from any national interests in Saudi Arabia as well as trade and country) demonstrated with bags over their heads in front of the White House. Secretary Vance pressured the Shah not to crack down on the dissidents in Iran as well as exiles like Khomeni. Eventually, a coalition of exiles, mullahs and Bazaaries overthrew the Shah and Khomeni hijacked the revolution. The rest is history and we are reaping what was sown in Iran from the Islamic fundamentalists. Whatever one may feel about the Saudi Royal family, it is better than anything I can see on the horizon.
82
posted on
12/17/2003 4:53:07 PM PST
by
kabar
(1.)
To: kabar
I guess I must be marching to another drummer. Better not get out of step with the prevailing wisdom.Well at least on this thread we haven't heard the grandaddy of all S.A. prevailing Wisdom; "17 of the 19 hijackers were Saudi, therefore Abdullah and Fahd financed 911" -- or something like that.
To: reagan_fanatic
If they do snatch some infidels and hold them in exchange for SH, then God help those poor infidels because SH ain't for sale.
84
posted on
12/17/2003 4:59:48 PM PST
by
Sender
(“We have placed them in a quagmire from which they can never emerge except dead” -Baghdad Bob)
To: yonif
Wow, 30,000 US citizens currently in the kingdom? I'm not sure that any amount of deluxe overtime pay would get me to work there now.
85
posted on
12/17/2003 5:12:06 PM PST
by
Sender
(“We have placed them in a quagmire from which they can never emerge except dead” -Baghdad Bob)
To: kabar
Thanks for your input, it's very helpful.
To: McGavin999
Thanks. I don't know what I did, but some of my comments were interspersed elsewhere making them somewhat incoherent. I meant to say we have important strategic national interests in Saudi Arabia as well as trade and military sales. Part of the sentence was moved from the 1st to the 2nd papragraph.
87
posted on
12/17/2003 5:24:36 PM PST
by
kabar
(1.)
To: kabar
They weren't incoherant at all. A lot of folks here don't understand the power struggle that's going on within SA and that by snarking at them all they weaken the good guys as well.
As for me, I'll just shut up and watch this one.
To: JustPiper
I saw your freep mail too. The article at CNN is dated: State Department issues 'worldwide caution'
Tuesday, December 16, 2003 Posted: 11:27 PM EST (0427 GMT) What was the error?
89
posted on
12/17/2003 6:09:37 PM PST
by
Calpernia
(Innocence seldom utters outraged shrieks. Guilt does.)
To: kabar
I can assure you the Greek government took it very seriously as did many travel agencies. Which I suppose is good, but it says nothing one way or the other about the accuracy of State Dept. travel warnings,
which typically cite no reason, rationale, or evidence for their findings.
And typically (this is a good thing), State's cautions don't come to fruition.
90
posted on
12/17/2003 7:45:26 PM PST
by
angkor
To: woodyinscc
There isn't anyone on earth that they'd trade for Sadaam. Sadaam has breathed his last free breath ever. Any breath he takes from this point on is a breath granted to him by the CIA, or whoever else is responsible for prying every last ounce of info out of him.
I don't care if they kidnap Britney Spears, Sadaam isn't going to be traded for anyone.
To: woodyinscc
Hmmmm, since Al Qaeda has had no relationship with Saddam, why would they ever want to get involved?
/sarcasm
92
posted on
12/17/2003 7:58:31 PM PST
by
Humidston
(Two Words: TERM LIMITS)
To: Scott from the Left Coast
I agree with you. There are some real crazies out there who are liable to do anything though.
To: RoughDobermann
Unfortunately the Hanukkah fun and games is about to start.
94
posted on
12/17/2003 8:04:48 PM PST
by
Cold Heat
("It is easier for an ass to succeed in that trade than any other." [Samuel Clemens, on lawyers])
To: billorites
They may have to cancel the Christmas parade. And the pig roast is probably off, too.
To: woodyinscc
You never know. If I were a bad guy and wanted him free, taking hostageswould be the first order of business.
96
posted on
12/17/2003 9:51:00 PM PST
by
doug from upland
(Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
To: doug from upland
97
posted on
12/17/2003 9:51:30 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: Calpernia
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The State Department is warning U.S. citizens and employees of an increased possibility of more terrorist attacks coinciding with the second anniversary of the September 11 attacks.
The above was above yesterday's date...giving the impression it was old. One poster asked , I responded, but still it the thread was pulled for wrong date and dated warning, you tell me -shrug- sometimes I just don't get it ya know
98
posted on
12/17/2003 10:16:59 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Saddam gives new meaning to "Ace in the Hole")
To: Bikers4Bush
They've been saying versions of that all year long. Nothing really new about it. Unless you aren't on the State Department ping list.
You are on the State Department ping list, aren't you?
99
posted on
12/17/2003 10:27:01 PM PST
by
Eagle Eye
( Saddam-Who's your Bagh-Daddy now?)
To: Smogger
Thank you Smogger, you put it the way it is. My thread was timely.;)
100
posted on
12/17/2003 10:27:28 PM PST
by
JustPiper
(Saddam gives new meaning to "Ace in the Hole")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-131 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson