Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDGES SELECTED TO HEAR TEN COMMANDMENTS APPEAL
Drudge Report link ^ | Dec. 15, 2003 | AP wire

Posted on 12/15/2003 9:07:55 PM PST by varina davis

Dec 15, 8:20 PM (ET)

By BOB JOHNSON

MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) - Seven retired judges, including a former governor, were selected randomly in a lottery Monday to hear Roy Moore's appeal of his ouster as chief justice, the latest unprecedented twist in his Ten Commandments case.

The drawing came just hours after all eight Supreme Court justices disqualified themselves from hearing the appeal because of their earlier involvement in the monument case.

Moore was ousted on Nov. 13 by a judicial ethics panel for refusing to obey a federal judge's order to remove his 5,300-pound Ten Commandments monument from the rotunda of the state judicial building. The eight justices had the monument moved to a storage room in August after Moore refused to do so.

To pick a replacement court for Moore's appeal, the names of all of the state's retired circuit, district and appeals court judges - except those physically unable to serve - were placed in a box and the seven names were drawn by Supreme Court Clerk Bob Esdale.

Only six members of the court are required to hear a case, but seven were chosen in order to avoid a tie vote.

The seven chosen include former Gov. John Patterson, who is also a retired criminal appeals court judge, and retired Supreme Court Justice Janie Shores.

Troy King, legal adviser to Gov. Bob Riley, said the governor had agreed to certify the seven judges.

Acting Chief Justice Gorman Houston called the proceeding "absolutely historic" - and "a tragedy." He said the only similar case occurred during an unsuccessful attempt by the Legislature to impeach several Supreme Court Justices in 1829.

Former Supreme Court Chief Justice C. C. "Bo" Torbert said he believes the drawing of the judges for the special court is unprecedented.

"I don't recall anything like this," Torbert said.

A Moore attorney said two of the replacement judges appear to have conflicts, but he did not provide names.

"The process produced at least two additional justices where questions of impartiality will likely require their recusal or disqualification from this appointed court," Phillip Jauregui said.

Jauregui also wanted Houston to have no part in the selection of replacement justices because of comments he had made to news reporters and because of the part he and the other justices played in having the monument moved.

Moore, who is known nationally as "the Ten Commandments judge," had the granite monument moved into the judicial building on July 31, 2001, saying the Ten Commandments represent the moral foundation of American law. A federal judge found the monument to be an unconstitutional promotion of religion by government following a trial in 2002.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: appeal; catholiclist; commandments; judges; moore
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-433 next last
Here's hoping Judge Moore gets a fair shake this time around.
1 posted on 12/15/2003 9:07:56 PM PST by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: varina davis
All seven of those "former" judges are Democrats.
2 posted on 12/15/2003 9:11:02 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Seven retired judges, including a former governor, were selected randomly in a lottery Monday

Would that be a 'Michigan judiciary'-style lottery?

3 posted on 12/15/2003 9:12:38 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat (www.firethebcs.com, www.weneedaplayoff.com, www.firemackbrown.com, www.firecarlreese.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
any chance they're Old School?
4 posted on 12/15/2003 9:13:16 PM PST by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
Here's hoping Judge Moore gets a fair shake this time around.

He got a fair shake last time around.

Supreme Court Chief Justices of States can not disobey Federal Court decisions.

Moore will lose, again.

5 posted on 12/15/2003 9:13:34 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Let's hope they're Dixiecrats.
6 posted on 12/15/2003 9:14:35 PM PST by varina davis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: sinkspur
Moore will lose, again.

That's ok, he just need to extend his 15 minutes until Alan Keyes arrives. Then the assclowing can begin.

8 posted on 12/15/2003 9:21:44 PM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Southack
All seven of those "former" judges are Democrats.

All 7 were selected randomly?

Are there any Repub. Judges?

9 posted on 12/15/2003 9:22:21 PM PST by Mo1 (House Work, If you do it right , will kill you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
All 8 of our current state Supreme Court Justices are Republicans.

Moore, however, is the odds-on favorite to defeat our current Republican governor in the 2006 Primary.

10 posted on 12/15/2003 9:27:35 PM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; Askel5; ...
Supreme Court Chief Justices of States can not disobey Federal Court decisions.

Let's be very clear here. You claim to be a Deacon in the Roman Catholic Church. You claim secular law trumps God's Law?

11 posted on 12/15/2003 9:31:41 PM PST by narses (If you want OFF or ON my Ping list, please email me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Do we want to officially disagree and go through it again?

Or can we just say, "refer to previous threads....it's all been said?" :>)
12 posted on 12/15/2003 9:31:52 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: narses
You claim secular law trumps God's Law?

It is not "God's law" to put a rock with the 10 Commandments on it in the lobby of a building.

This went all the way to the Supreme Court, which refused to allow Moore to keep his rock.

13 posted on 12/15/2003 9:33:41 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Do we want to officially disagree and go through it again?

It's up to you. Your man has lost every single time.

He will lose again.

14 posted on 12/15/2003 9:34:41 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
It's the principle I'm interested in.

Free Speech.

But "free speech" isn't in fashion with courts this year. Not even in Wash DC.
15 posted on 12/15/2003 9:37:16 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
If this was about the removal of a plaque that had been sitting there forever and someone decides to come along and get it removed, it's something I'd take issue with. But apparently this guy put it there himself with the intention of causing a confrontation (which many people are not aware of). I can't have much sympathy for that, myself, and I don't think it does anything for the cause.
16 posted on 12/15/2003 9:41:10 PM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Yep, Man's law wins in your book.
17 posted on 12/15/2003 9:45:44 PM PST by narses (If you want OFF or ON my Ping list, please email me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: varina davis

18 posted on 12/15/2003 9:49:38 PM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varina davis
selected randomly in a lottery Monday

They are reporting that Moore will not recognize the jurisdiction of the judges because they were selected by a lottery, which is gambling, and a sin.(kidding)

19 posted on 12/15/2003 9:51:43 PM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
Man's law wins in your book.

In cases where there is no divine law contravening, you bet it does.

20 posted on 12/15/2003 9:53:56 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-433 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson