Posted on 12/15/2003 9:41:06 AM PST by neverdem
Mon Dec 15,12:14 AM ET
In one of the largest moves to "offshore" highly paid U.S. software jobs, International Business Machines Corp. (NYSE:IBM - News) has told its managers to plan on moving the work of as many as 4,730 programmers to India, China and elsewhere, Monday's Wall Street Journal reported.
delayed 20 mins - disclaimer Quote Data provided by Reuters
The unannounced plan, outlined in company documents viewed by The Wall Street Journal, would replace thousands of workers at IBM facilities in Southbury, Conn., Poughkeepsie, N.Y., Raleigh, N.C., Dallas, Boulder, Colo., and elsewhere in the U.S.Already, the managers have been told, IBM has hired 500 engineers in India to take on some of the work that will be moved.
IBM calls its plan, first presented internally to some midlevel managers in October, "Global Sourcing." It involves people in its Application Management Services group, a part of IBM's giant global-services operations, which comprise more than half IBM's 315,000 employees.
IBM's plan, still under development, will take place over a number of months in stages. About 947 people are scheduled to be notified during the first half of the coming year that their work will be handled overseas in the future. It isn't yet clear how many of the other 3,700 jobs identified as "potential to move offshore" in the IBM documents will move next year or some time later.
However, the fate of some of the targeted jobs isn't certain: IBM managers still haven't figured out whether all of the work the jobs represent can be performed just as well abroad. The jobs involve updating and improving software for IBM's own business operations.
Some workers are scheduled to be informed of the plan for their jobs by the end of January. After that they will be expected to train an overseas replacement worker in the U.S. for several weeks. The IBM workers marked for replacement have 60 days to find another job inside the company, likely to be a difficult task at a time when IBM is holding down hiring.
IBM declined to comment on what it called "internal presentations."
Wall Street Journal Staff Reporters William M. Bulkeley and Peter Fritsch contributed to this article.
These are people who aren't looking for jobs or don't need them. Are you going to count housewives among the unemployed?
Those steel tariffs, by the way, cost many, many automotive jobs for each steel job they "saved."
The auto tariffs, meanwhile, have not exactly priced foreign-built cars out of the market. I don't know if our auto manufacturing jobs will stay here, but some jobs have to go somewhere else, because from year to year we create enough jobs that we keep something close to full employment (4%) and still send thousands out of the country to where they will help the Third World improve its standard of living.
If you really want to guarantee full employment, and solve a whole slew of other problems while you're at it, let's repeal some labor regs and then have women go back to raising families instead of clogging the labor market.
What an arrogant, ignorant and despicable piece of bigotry. Are you aware how the BLS classifies a person as no longer 'unemployed' or in the work force? Prove your contention.
We don't tariff the general car market. We do have protective quotas however. That is what forced Toyota, Nissan, Honda etc to move plants onto our shores.
I do. They won't. They will go to China as surely as will the rest of America's industrial base. Count on it.
Faded Glory indeed!
Another stock to dump and send a message!
Let's not make this unnecessarily tedious, so get off the high horse, ok?
People who remain "unemployed" for a very extended period of time are indeed dropped from the classification, it's true, but that's after several quarters of being unemployed--more than a year, I think. By then you have to think they either aren't looking in earnest and/or have found a way to get by without a job, meaning they don't "need" one. (Or maybe they've starved to death or they're in prison?) I was recently unemployed, started looking right before Sept. 11, 2001. To me, the four months out of work was an eternity, but even in the post-9/11 market I found something in less than a year.
As to "Sub-employment." If you have a Ph.D. and you're working at McDonalds, and you can't get out of that field after a time, then it's your own fault. You can't be "sub"-employed because all that education notwithstanding, you are clearly in the best job you can do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.