Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lieberman: Dean Would Have Kept Saddam in Power
NewsMax.com ^ | 12/14/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 12/14/2003 9:48:20 AM PST by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: MarkeyD
Joe has been consistent on this all along
41 posted on 12/14/2003 10:04:38 AM PST by BamaFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
... Dean told reporters on the campaign trail in Florida, "I think this is a day to celebrate the fact that Saddam has been captured and we'll have to worry about the campaign later on.

"President Bush deserves a day of celebration. We have our policy differences but we won't be discussing those today," he added.

No, Dr. Dean, it would not be a good day to discuss your pacifist approach to dealing with international terrorism and the threat to the United States. You are immanently unqualified to do so ...

42 posted on 12/14/2003 10:04:56 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD
From MSNBC:

“This is the choice the voters have to make in the primaries: If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would be in power today, not in prison,” Lieberman told Russert.

43 posted on 12/14/2003 10:05:11 AM PST by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Callahan
The Dems who supported the war, i.e. Leiberman and Gephardt, are feeling bold now that Saddam is on the dock. What took you so long, Joe???

Lurch is now going to say he was ready to single handedly capture Ho Chi Mihn in Vietnam, but Nixon stopped him.

44 posted on 12/14/2003 10:06:04 AM PST by Hacksaw (theocratic Confederate flag waving loyalty oath supporter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
As a constituent of and frequent contributor to Joe's email account, I would differ. But we're all entitled to our opinions.
45 posted on 12/14/2003 10:06:10 AM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Now THAT'S funny!
46 posted on 12/14/2003 10:06:17 AM PST by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Lieberman should go one more step. Dean would have kept Hussein in power and his supporters (Gore and Clinton) did keep him power.
47 posted on 12/14/2003 10:06:27 AM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crz
Isn't it fun to sit back and watch the Dem candidates implode right before our eyes?
48 posted on 12/14/2003 10:06:41 AM PST by LisaMalia (Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: crz

The Democrats would have let Saddam stay in power!   There would have been even more mass graves.  There would have been even more terrorism on American soil. 

49 posted on 12/14/2003 10:07:01 AM PST by Ramtek57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
                       
The Official Breakfast Cereal
    Of The Democratic Party

50 posted on 12/14/2003 10:07:10 AM PST by BraveMan (Isaiah 9:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Please let Howard Dean be the demonRAT nominee, please let Howard Dean be the demonRAT nominee...

By Election Day '04, a demonRAT antiwar candidate will be a national comedy.
51 posted on 12/14/2003 10:07:27 AM PST by freedomcrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EveningStar
“This is the choice the voters have to make in the primaries: If Howard Dean had his way, Saddam Hussein would be in power today, not in prison,” Lieberman told Russert.

Ouch, that's gotta hurt.

52 posted on 12/14/2003 10:07:46 AM PST by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
You're his constituent? I'm sorry. Really. :-) But good ole Joe has said some things that none of the other candidates would say.

Of course, that doesn't mean I'd vote for him. It doesn't go that far. LOL

53 posted on 12/14/2003 10:08:11 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (¿Podemos ahora sonreír?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: aspiring.hillbilly; All
Lets not outsmart our selves,,,we want DEANIE-WEENEY to win the demoncrap nomination....so I say go DEANIE-WEENEY !!!! on to your partys nomination.....

I absolutely agree! GO DEAN!!! heh, heh ;-)

Actually we should push for Ge-fart since he would have a tougher time winning against Bush simply because Ge-fart is soooo picken' boring and uninspiring.

54 posted on 12/14/2003 10:08:31 AM PST by tame (If I must be the victim of a criminal, please let it be Catwoman! Rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
One can really upset your opponents by covert operations. Lets say Joe is mad enough after the back stab from Gore and the rest last week. Lets say he is mad enough to accept a donation/donations from a friendly supporter to stay in the race just to raise cain within his party. Then at the end pulls out to support someone closer to his views such as the republican candidate. I think you get my drift.
55 posted on 12/14/2003 10:08:48 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Lieberman has always had balls.

Oh, come on! Nerf Balls if ha has any. He's pro-war simply because of his jewish roots. (And I find nothing wrong with that) But balls? The guy folded as a VP candidate on school choice (NEA) & morality (music industry). Ask his friend Bill Bennett if Joe has balls.

56 posted on 12/14/2003 10:08:52 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford; jwalsh07
Lieberman has always had balls.

Oh, come on! Nerf Balls if ha has any. He's pro-war simply because of his jewish roots. (And I find nothing wrong with that) But balls? The guy folded as a VP candidate on school choice (NEA) & morality (music industry). Ask his friend Bill Bennett if Joe has balls.

57 posted on 12/14/2003 10:09:23 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LisaMalia
There isnt a slam sheet newspaper in the world that can hold a candle to this debacle.
58 posted on 12/14/2003 10:09:56 AM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Just a classic day over there on DU. Confusion, despair, cluelessness.............Oh wait, that's the way it is every day!!!!
59 posted on 12/14/2003 10:10:01 AM PST by raptor29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Droopy Dawg, I mean Loserman, I mean LIEberman saw the wind blow in this direction today.

Tune in tomorrow and he'll shift back.

60 posted on 12/14/2003 10:12:04 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("if you wanna run cool, you got to run, on heavy heavy fuel" - Dire Straits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson