Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Experts Say Diets Bring Record Egg Prices
AP/yahoo.comnews ^ | December 10, 2003 | RYAN LENZ,AP

Posted on 12/10/2003 9:39:16 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last
To: js1138
If, however, you are going to promote a diet that limits bread and potatoes and rice -- foods that have fed most of humanity throughout recorded history, you will need some long term studies to back up your claims.

Lobbing random grenades your way:

Potatoes in particular have among the highest glycemic indexes of any common carbohydrate. The insulin response to potato starch is something like twice that of pure cane sugar. This causes cumulative cardiovascular damage over time independent of any weight gain/loss issues caused by highly variable insulin levels. Generally speaking, potatoes are dietary evil, and I say that as someone who absolutely loves potatoes.

Potatoes are recent additions to the European diet, and weren't really cultivated to any great extent until the 18th century. (ObTrivia: The Chinese were originally a barley based agrarian culture, and adopted rice from SE asian cultures at a much later date.) There are many pervasively common foods now that have only been in common consumption for humans for hundreds of years, something most people are not aware of or forget. Also, long-term health effects have been something that have really only been observable recently.

The carbs that have been widely consumed by humanity since the pre-history are actually relatively few, e.g. wheat and barley.

61 posted on 12/10/2003 11:48:59 AM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Oh no! The last dozen eggs I bought at the grocery store cost 70 cents. What's next?! 72 cents?!
62 posted on 12/10/2003 11:49:38 AM PST by July 4th (George W. Bush, Avenger of the Bones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
This was in the regular pre-wrapped section of our local grocery. We saw standing rib roasts at Sam's Club a couple of weeks ago for $8.99/lb. It's crazy I tell ya!
63 posted on 12/10/2003 11:51:23 AM PST by Trust but Verify (Will work for W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Dang Atkins! To quote Earl Pitts: "I know he's dead, but it he weren't I'd make him wish he wuz."
64 posted on 12/10/2003 11:51:48 AM PST by BSunday (Libs, libs, everywhere, but not a brain to pick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fangorn
I bet I never ate 10 omelets in my entire 42 years before I started this diet, now it's what's for breakfast every day.

LOL You eat 10 omelets for breakfast every day? Hate to tell ya, but you're problem is not WHAT you're eating, it's how much!! ;) /kidding of course

65 posted on 12/10/2003 11:54:27 AM PST by BSunday (Libs, libs, everywhere, but not a brain to pick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tortoise
I'm going to guess that the ill effects of potatoes, like the effects of milk and peanuts, are variable.
66 posted on 12/10/2003 11:57:05 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
When eggs are outlawed only outlaws will have eggs.
67 posted on 12/10/2003 11:57:57 AM PST by luckodeirish (Feel His Joy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty; carlo3b
Carlo gathers us low-carbers together occasionally (though, more frequently during this holiday season) and, as a bonus, he posts low-carb recipes that are divine.

Ask him to ping 'ya.

68 posted on 12/10/2003 12:02:56 PM PST by Carolina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I'm going to guess that the ill effects of potatoes, like the effects of milk and peanuts, are variable.

No, the effects are much more regular than either milk or peanuts. Milk and peanuts have affects that are very specific to the individual. Potatoes have a very basic metabolic effects that are consistent across most mammals. The comparison is inappropriate.

69 posted on 12/10/2003 12:07:36 PM PST by tortoise (All these moments lost in time, like tears in the rain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Carolina; carlo3b
Great. Thank yo, Carolina

Carlo, please add me to your ping list.

70 posted on 12/10/2003 12:13:01 PM PST by Tree of Liberty (I can get you a toe by 3 o'clock this afternoon... WITH nail polish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: js1138
It all has to do with math. (See, it is important kids!) The Atkins Diet and other diets that are successful have been able to determine a formula that will help lower weight and keep it off, but there are other ways to do it as well.

For example, if you were to just walk 15 minutes at a brisk pace three days a week, you would "lose" around 58lbs in 20 years without doing anything else.

A brisk 15 minute walk burns 65 calories.
65 x 3 = 195 calories per week.
195 x 52 = 10140 calories per year.
10,140 x 20 = 202,800 calories over 20 years.
202,800 / 3500 = 57.94 pounds.

It's that simple. Or, you could cut out one can of Coke (140 calories) a day and "lose" 292 lbs in the same 20 years. You aren't actually "losing" weight in this case, you are simply not adding the calories to your diet. But this just shows that most people take a short term look at weight loss (need to lose 20 lbs in 3 months!) rather than a long term approach. (My personal goal is 132 lbs in 4 years. I'm just at 22 months and have lost 59 lbs, so I'm on track.)

If people are just looking for a quick fix, no system or program in the world will help them. But if they are serious about weight control, Atkins and Weight Watchers seem to be the best at helping you change your view of food.

71 posted on 12/10/2003 12:14:30 PM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: BSunday
Yeah, that was poorly phrased, I agree. One omelet and it's three eggs. My appetite has dropped fairly precipitously since I started this.
72 posted on 12/10/2003 12:48:45 PM PST by Fangorn (Fangorn! What madness drove them in there?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty; Carolina; All
Lets get the SKINNY on the Atkins Diet
73 posted on 12/10/2003 1:02:11 PM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
Absolutely right; thanks for the informed comments.
74 posted on 12/10/2003 1:05:09 PM PST by NorthGA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
egg prices have climbed to as much as $1.40 a dozen

Around here, eggs usually cost $2 a dozen for large eggs (~50 grams each, the smallest size in supermarkets), more for extra large or jumbo.

75 posted on 12/10/2003 2:03:30 PM PST by heleny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: js1138
I have no idea whether sheding unwanted fat is good in the long run. If you mean twenty pounds, there is lots of evidence that repeated attempts at dieting are more unhealthy than having the extra weight. One hundred pounds? probably need to lose some of it. But there is not a shred of evidence that it will make you live longer. At least not yet.

There's evidence that those caloric restriction diets that make rats & other animals live twice as long as normal are due to their lowered insulin levels.

See for instance here and here.

76 posted on 12/10/2003 3:28:09 PM PST by jennyp (http://lowcarbshopper.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
Carlo, please add me to your ping list.

Welcome aboard.. :)

77 posted on 12/10/2003 4:20:39 PM PST by carlo3b (http://www.CookingWithCarlo.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
I might be wrong, but I still don't think there's any evidence that humans live longer as a result of dieting. The animal studies require reducing the animal to 85% or less of its free-feeding weight. That would be pretty brutal in humans, and would involve being hungry all the time.
78 posted on 12/11/2003 4:25:48 AM PST by js1138
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: js1138
That would be pretty brutal in humans, and would involve being hungry all the time.

Exactly! Which is why the low-carb diet is so great: You're never hungry or draggy. (Except when you just plain forget to eat lunch, which happens with me on this diet.) Low-carb diets reduce insulin levels; that's the whole idea behind it. So the point is, caloric restriction per se isn't what's extending the animals' lives, it's the insulin restriction.

Here's an interesting news item from just today, where researchers have discovered there are at least two proteins in the insulin pathway that work synergistically to increase longevity when they're disabled.

79 posted on 12/11/2003 2:44:28 PM PST by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson