Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
To: JohnHuang2
Darn! It looks like Dubya just lost the all-crucial pagan vote.
2 posted on
12/09/2003 1:08:43 AM PST by
ABG(anybody but Gore)
(...And second prize goes to Kenny, for his Edward James Olmos impersonation!)
To: JohnHuang2
They'd have more of a case if they could show an example of a "pagan faith based group". One that meets the qualification of not trying to preach to or convert the recipients.
3 posted on
12/09/2003 1:38:49 AM PST by
weegee
(No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
To: JohnHuang2
Backed up by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, pagans across the U.S. are demanding a Bush administration official apologize for saying pagan groups don't care about the poor. If the AUFSOCAS (or AUSCS) was really against State sponsorship of any religious ties to government they would be opposing the pagans' attempts at faith based charity exemptions. Holding up a fringe religion for inclusion does not make their case AGAINST Church and State ties.
The Washington Post reports since Towey's comment, outraged pagans have bombarded the White House and Internet chat rooms with scores of examples of their charitable activity. Particularly common, they say, are food drives in conjunction with Pagan Pride Day celebrations across the country.
"Once you make it clear to any applicant that public money must go to public purposes and can't be used to promote ideology...
Pagan Pride Day celebrations would appear to promote ideology.
4 posted on
12/09/2003 1:45:13 AM PST by
weegee
(No blood for ratings! This means YOU AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-CNN)
To: JohnHuang2
G A L
(Get A Life)
To: JohnHuang2
"Blessed Be" bump
6 posted on
12/09/2003 3:21:00 AM PST by
Dajjal
To: JohnHuang2
I know a few pagans. They ride Harleys', and I don't think they vote at all.
7 posted on
12/09/2003 3:22:35 AM PST by
zygoat
To: JohnHuang2
"I haven't run into a pagan faith-based group yet, much less a pagan group that cares for the poor!" Towey responded
So, he hasn't 'run into' any yet -- that makes him a bad guy?
Sounds to me like the anti-American crowd is once again finding an excuse to bellyache.
8 posted on
12/09/2003 3:29:15 AM PST by
Ed_in_NJ
To: JohnHuang2
ROFL!! The ultimate insult in post-Clinton America --You don't care! If Bush had accused them of idol-worship, conducting a Black Mass, or infanticide, it would be taken as a badge of honor. But to not care?? Outrageous!
9 posted on
12/09/2003 3:35:39 AM PST by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Republicam)
To: JohnHuang2
This faith-based stuff is just stupid.
11 posted on
12/09/2003 3:43:37 AM PST by
Print
To: JohnHuang2
I finally get what all this hollering for apologies is about. If we acquiesce, it gives them legitimacy when, in fact, they have none. If they were just ignored, as they should be, soon their complaints would become like the clanking of hollow tin.
14 posted on
12/09/2003 4:17:57 AM PST by
sweetliberty
(Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.)
To: JohnHuang2
To: JohnHuang2
Pagan poppycock. :)
26 posted on
12/09/2003 12:10:36 PM PST by
blackie
To: JohnHuang2
The Pagans apparently need to bring down a couple of buildings in order to get themselves a Solstice Dinner at the White House.
To: JohnHuang2
Particularly common, they say, are food drives in conjunction with Pagan Pride Day celebrations across the country.
A one-day food drive doth not a "faith-based charitable organization" make...
To: JohnHuang2
LOL
They really are coming out of the woodwork against the President aren't they?
The pagans are endorsing Clarke and Dean, so who cares if they are insulted? (Bogus anyway)
31 posted on
12/09/2003 1:25:47 PM PST by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: JohnHuang2

"WORST-CHAT-EVER!
38 posted on
12/09/2003 6:12:51 PM PST by
MikalM
To: JohnHuang2
Please don't throw me in that briar patch...lol
39 posted on
12/09/2003 6:19:49 PM PST by
Liberty Valance
(Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
To: JohnHuang2
Oh jeez louise.................there goes the pagan vote.
To: JohnHuang2
I wouldn't want to get on the wrong side of those pagan folks. They might offer me as a human sacrifice.
41 posted on
12/09/2003 6:23:55 PM PST by
mrobison
(We are the music makers and we are the dreamers of dreams.)
To: JohnHuang2
"Most troublingly, it implies that the Bush administration intends to discriminate against certain faith-[based] groups from the outset. This is a curious stand for you to take, as you have repeatedly insisted that the administration will not play favorites among religious groups under the faith-based initiative."Discrimination based on religious beliefs is not permitted by the Constitution, but that is not what was proposed here. The plan is to discriminate among charitable groups based on how much they help the poor...the money IS for the poor, after all.
Lynn isn't making a mistake here, he knows he's twisting 'no discrimination based on religious beliefs' into 'no discrimination among religious groups.'
42 posted on
12/09/2003 6:28:27 PM PST by
Petronski
(Living life in a minor key.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-24 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson