Skip to comments.
Gore's Endorsement Slaps Bill & Hillary
NewsMax.com ^
| 12/08/03
| Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 12/08/2003 9:51:07 PM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
1
posted on
12/08/2003 9:51:07 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Now that is interesting, to think that Gore might put himself in a position to be drafted instead of Hillary. This should be a fun election year.
2
posted on
12/08/2003 9:54:38 PM PST
by
squidly
To: kattracks
Gotta love all this backstabbing amongs the Rats!!
To: kattracks
There ain't gonna be no draft at the convention! Jeez!!
4
posted on
12/08/2003 10:00:16 PM PST
by
Az Joe
To: squidly
It's going to be a fun, and interesting election year! I have to admit, though, I was surprised at Gore endorsing Dean. When I read the first article about it, I thought it was a joke.
We sure have heard many theories - Hillary wants Dean to be nominated, so they'll realize their mistake and nominate her at the convention, Hillary wants a "loser" to run so Bush will win, and she will get the nod for 2008, or that Hillary and Bill want Clark to run, and she'll run as VP.
5
posted on
12/08/2003 10:02:04 PM PST
by
Theresawithanh
(Just a conservative CA gal, living in lib-land....)
To: squidly
This is the exact take I had on Gore's endorsement. It hit me when I read the announcement would take place in Harlem.
After I read that it was easy to see how it laid out. I thought it was just to hold Dean's crazy supporters for 2008 but I can see how it plays for 2004.
To: kattracks
Evening, kat.
Great post. (I love NewsMax!)
BUMP
To: kattracks; Alamo-Girl
8
posted on
12/08/2003 10:09:29 PM PST
by
archy
(Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
To: kattracks
I keep hearing this, but I wonder if it is true. Are Bill and Hillary really backing Clark? I am confused, as I think the Clinton' s only back themselves, especially Hillary.
9
posted on
12/08/2003 10:11:36 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: Lancey Howard
Good evening LH, and thank you.
(So do I)
To: kattracks
>>A Gore-Dean ticket may sound crazy now, but it could be a real possibility by next summer. <<
Someone shoot me---I know I can't take this!!!
I knew it----It's going to be Dean-Gore.
I'd say I'm moving to Canada, but I hate them even more.
AARGH!!
To: ladyinred
The thinking is that Clark is running interference for them, just trying to keep the party divided until that day when Hillary chooses to unite it.
12
posted on
12/08/2003 10:15:31 PM PST
by
squidly
To: kattracks
Oh, this is going to be very interesting. A war between Gore/Dean and the Clintons. They're going to be fighting for the soul (what's left of it) of the democrat party.
To: ladyinred
By backing Clark the clintons hoped to stop Dean, whom they don't control. Dean is a real threat to them, so in effect, by backing Clark, the clintons are backing themselves.
To: kattracks
Oh I see, lol, I think! My , my, those two are something.
15
posted on
12/08/2003 10:20:59 PM PST
by
ladyinred
(The Left have blood on their hands!)
To: McGavin999
They're going to be fighting for the soul (what's left of it) of the democrat party. Not to mention the $$$ of the democratic party, although hillary! seems to be making plans for another avenue of that $$$. Amricans Coming Together.
To: kattracks
Somebody should slap Bill & Chillery.
To: squidly
I just read something that made me look at this another way. On another thread the article talked about the Unions and Moveon.org coming to Gore and basically telling him to get on board before he gets left at the station.
If this is true [apparently Moveon.org is the only folks that have been willing to host (read pay for and fill the seats) his political speeches that last year] then it may have been Dean that chose the Harlem location as a slap at the Clintons, which if you think about it is an act that is more in line with his personality than Gore's.
To: kattracks
I think the author is wrong, the jockeying by Gore and Hillary is not for 2004 at all. It is and always has been all about 2008. I can only hope and pray that the Republicans come up with the best possible candidate then to stop them.
To: McGavin999
A war between Gore/Dean and the ClintonsIs that you, Gordine?
20
posted on
12/08/2003 10:59:27 PM PST
by
Jeff Chandler
(Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson