Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin to assume the power of a Tsar
Telegraph ^ | December 12 2003 | Julius Strauss

Posted on 12/08/2003 5:11:21 AM PST by blanknoone

President Vladimir Putin took control of the Russian parliament last night, removing the last effective bastion of opposition to his rule and paving the way for him to assume Tsar-like power.

A sailor leaves a polling booth in the Black Sea port of Sevastopol Exit polls last night gave United Russia, the president's party, 37 per cent of the vote, the Communists 15 per cent and Vladimir Zhirinovsky's Liberal Democrats 12 per cent. Rodina, a new nationalist party, was predicted to have won nine per cent.

This would give Mr Putin's party and its allies about 58 per cent of the vote and return Russia to an era of single-party dominance after 12 years of vibrant, if corrupt, democracy.

With 11.33 per cent of the votes counted, United Russia had 36.3 per cent, the Liberal Democrats 14.8 per cent, the Communists 12.9 and Rodina 7.7 per cent.

Liberals predicted the election would come to be seen as a milestone on the country's slow regression towards Soviet-style authoritarianism.

United Russia is hoping that it might win a two-thirds majority in the new State Duma which would give it the power to change the constitution at will.

Rumours abound that Mr Putin, who is all but certain to win a second term in March next year, wants to scrap a clause limiting the president to two terms in office.

Officially the former KGB spy is above the fray and should not endorse United Russia, the party he created to support him four years ago. But, in an address 10 days ago, he said the election would determine "whether my hands and feet are tied, whether the president would be able to do his work or not".

In economic terms Russia is a robust and brash capitalist economy, which has embraced the principle of private ownership, but politically Mr Putin and his entourage now dominate the country.

Anna Pastukhova, an official with Memorial, a Russian human rights organisation, in the Urals town of Yekaterinburg, said: "We are moving back to a time of less freedom and democracy and more control. Our local governor, who is with United Russia, said that it is right we should have in this country one dominant party and a few small ones. What kind of a vision is that?"

The Communists, traditionally the country's largest parliamentary party, have been subjected to weeks of vicious attack on national and local television. The result has been that United Russia has surged ahead of them in recent weeks after level-pegging in the autumn.

Gennady Zyuganov, the veteran Communist leader, said: "The election campaign has been an evil farce. Formally the parliament will be elected but in fact it will be appointed by the presidential administration."

The first step in the reversal of Russian democracy came in 1993 when President Yeltsin stripped parliament of many of its powers, handing them to himself.

Since Mr Putin came to office in 2000 the process has been accelerated. Opposition-controlled media have been neutered and tycoons unwilling to toe the Kremlin line exiled or jailed. United Russia, invented by Mr Putin as a vehicle for his policies in the State Duma, has risen in importance.

Victory today will represent a remarkable achievement for a party that has no ideology and only the barest outline of a political platform.

Its identity is so amorphous that its campaign posters carry pictures of both Stalin and Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the veteran Soviet-era dissident.

In the run-up to the elections, its leaders have refused to hold television debates, suggesting they were above such things.

Many United Russia supporters say they will back the party simply because it is already in power. One man, a driver, said he would vote for it because "they are the bosses".

Officially each party is limited to spending about £5 million on the election campaign but independent estimates say United Russia may have spent hundreds of millions.

Western observers say the slanted media coverage and incidents of gerrymandering mean this Russian election is the least democratic since Boris Yeltsin came to power.

"It's far worse than in 1999," one observer said. "We warned the government that they must stop the abuses but they don't care what we think."

As a result, the only two liberal parties presently in the Duma - Yabloko and the Union of Right Forces - may fail to achieve the five per cent needed for representation.

The only group of voters set to outstrip United Russia supporters are those who have become so alienated that they will not vote at all - as many as 40 per cent of Russia's 110 million eligible voters.

Polling was conducted amid tight security after a suicide bombing on a packed commuter train in Yessentuki in southern Russia claimed 42 lives on Friday. A man believed to have conspired in the attack was arrested yesterday. Chechen separatists are suspected of seeking to disrupt the election.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Russia
KEYWORDS: elections; putin; putinrussia; russia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last
To: RussianConservative
So. Do Russians have any resposibility for Tsarist or Soviet period. Yes or no?
41 posted on 12/08/2003 10:36:51 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
From my perspective, it would make sense to say "the "Russians" were responsible for everything up through end of Tsarist rule in 1917, since that was an organic outgrowth of centuries of valid historical processes, and "Russians" (Slavic, native tribes assimilated, native tribes NOT assimilated, and Jewish immigrants from anti-Semitic parts of Western Europe), as peoples and as individuals over centuries had time to try to influnce the historical processes.

By contrast, it makes sense for Russians to absolutely reject any responsibility for Soviet rule and its mass murder and repression (especially of the Russians and Ukrainians) precisely because it was an a-historical process, a shock to the system which took place almost instantly, and an internationalist conspiracy led by people almost entirely NOT of Slavic-Russian heritage. In other words, even if the Soviet dictatorship had been the most benign rule in the world, it still was NOT an organic outgrowth of Russian history. It need not and would not have happened except for foreign funding e.g. from Imperial Germany.

I guess the analogy would be let's suppose a comet hits the United States and because of the shock to the system with massive death and disruption, there comes widespread dictatorship, murder, kidnapping, starvation, etc. (sort of like Communism). Would it be fair to accuse Americans of the post-disaster loss of civic values? What if a dictator drafted men in such an environment and invades Canada and Mexico and kills millions? I think you can at least see the analogy.

We can all pray to the Lord for healing of the horrors of the past century.

42 posted on 12/08/2003 11:06:11 AM PST by wildandcrazyrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
Putin to assume the power of a Tsar

Sorelosermanovitch.

43 posted on 12/08/2003 11:14:13 AM PST by malakhi (Do, or do not. There is no try.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wildandcrazyrussian
Okay. I see a glimmer of hope. I do believe you must look a little harder at the fact that while some of the actual dictators where not Russian, they could not wield their power alone. It took many many willing individuals to carry out the policies. It's like Germans trying to blame all of Nazism on just Hitler alone. I've gone through the same process with my Ukrainian heritage, see the good, but not ignore the bad. Hope for real change ( which is major reason I am disappointed in current state of affairs, fear they have not learned lessons of past).

Really wish common Russians nothing but the best. Hope they can get a chance to live free and prosperous. It's up to them now.

And finally can agree completely with your final statement.
See, there is some hope after all Gospodin.
44 posted on 12/08/2003 11:39:59 AM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Yes Russian have responsability for Imperial age, it was Russian only in so much as taken to context of events and other players/factors of events. To blame all evils of last 1,500 years on Russians, then no.
45 posted on 12/08/2003 11:52:37 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Not trying to blame anyone for all evils, lots to go around. We all need to recognise past mistakes to avoid making them again.
46 posted on 12/08/2003 12:01:24 PM PST by Kozak (Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
Don't jump to conclusions. I do know a little about Russian characteristics. I have been in correspondence with a Russian for over 10 years and have visited your country twice. I also can read.

You admit in your post that they--and you, the way you worded it--like a strong man, a point that I made. I think it does not speak well of a people if they prefer to be controlled and told what to do. They accept this just so there can be "order."

Maybe I am prejudiced by my being an American, a group that generally prefers independence and self-reliance and most importantly, true democracy, even if the process can sometimes be messy and horrors! disorderly.

The thought of being controlled by a "strong man" is repugnant to us. And if you thought about it for any time, it should be to you, too.
47 posted on 12/09/2003 6:52:31 AM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
As others have asked, I'm curious about your take on the elections.

Most of the press here has been negative. I'm not sure why, as President Putin has seemed to take a course that has been good for Russia. Perhaps it's because his course has not been good for some of the guys who stole Russia's wealth after the change.

But then with our press it's very hard to find an objective opinion, or even objective facts.
48 posted on 12/09/2003 7:12:01 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: jimt
Judge man by actions and not by leftest rhetorict...allow me to remind, these are same useful idiots that now remold Communist (and Stalinist Gennady) as protectors Russian democracy....maybe US and EU want some more this protection? Russia will pay for shipping too.
49 posted on 12/09/2003 8:51:45 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: OldPossum
That funny, since last I read 20% of Americans work for government. Read here it grow all time and tell everyone what to do and think...so you right, you not have strong man rule, you have strong elite rule. Instead one bastard, many bastards, results same. Also, not all society the same and not all peoples want to be Americans or think same. Look at Chile, best economy of S.America...and why? One strong rational man, genius Pinoche.
50 posted on 12/09/2003 8:54:37 AM PST by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: RussianConservative
It's obvious that we wouldn't agree that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west, so I'll just sign off now.

One cannot argue with one who knows all the facts and what they mean.

OldPossum

P.S. The United States is governed by the rule of law, not by the "bastard" elites. Important differentiation. You should look it up.
51 posted on 12/09/2003 3:21:16 PM PST by OldPossum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson