Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIME Exclusive: IRAQ INSURGENTS SHOW OFF FIREPOWER TO TIME
Time ^ | Sunday, Dec. 07, 2003 | Brian Bennett and Michael Ware

Posted on 12/07/2003 11:39:02 AM PST by At _War_With_Liberals

TIME Interviews Dozens of Insurgents and Disgruntled Iraqis, Attends Resistance Meetings and Views Videotape of Attacks Against Coalition Forces Guerillas Trying to Drive U.S. Casualties So High That American Public Turns Against The War – ‘They Could Succeed,’ Pentagon Official Says

New York -- U.S. intelligence experts now believe the Iraq insurgents are a volatile mix of groups and free-lancers who include loyalists of the former ruling Baath Party, Fedayeen militiamen, former Republican Guard and intelligence agents, foreign jihadis, professional terrorists, paid common criminals and disaffected Iraqis, TIME's Brian Bennett and Michael Ware report from Iraq.

Over the past three months, TIME has interviewed dozens of insurgents and disgruntled Iraqis, attended resistance meetings and viewed videotape of attacks against coalition forces. Often reporters have been required to submit to blindfolds, circuitous drives by night, vehicle switching, meetings that rarely occurred in the same place and, of course, frequent personal searches for phones and tracking devices. (At no time did TIME reporters have prior information about attacks.) As seen from the inside, the insurgency looks as complex and diverse an enemy as the U.S. could possibly face.

Showing Firepower: Inside Attack on Baghdad Airport: At the modest farmhouse of a fellow member of his network of insurgents one recent evening, Abu Ali—the nom de guerre he has chosen—welcomes seven fighters into a room lined with worn sofas. Checking his watch, he abruptly rises from a sofa, throws on a woolen overcoat and orders everyone, including the reporter, to move out. The men pile into three cars and tear off in different directions. For more than an hour they cruise near the launch site until all looks clear. Then a small team walks into a flat field to aim a rack of homemade launching tubes toward the lights of the Baghdad airport, home to U.S. chopper squadrons, supply units and the CIA-led Iraq Survey Group, less than two miles away. The insurgents load three air-to-air rockets they have modified to launch from the ground, flash a signal with car headlights and disappear. A second team creeps in to fire the volley, while a security detail armed with assault rifles and machine guns forms a perimeter. Beyond these fighters, according to the cell’s security chief, a ring of men with shoulder-fired surface-to-air missiles and rocket-propelled grenades is watching for U.S. helicopters that might try to stop them, TIME reports.

Bolder, Better Organized -- “They Could Succeed”: Attacks against coalition forces have grown bolder, better organized and broader based. A double ambush last week in Samarra “was the biggest, most sophisticated so far,” says a senior intelligence official in Washington. As a Pentagon official sees it: “They know they can’t beat us militarily, but they think they might be able to defeat us politically.” The guerrillas are trying to drive U.S. casualties so high that the American public turns against the war, he says, adding, "They could succeed."

"Bring Back Saddam": Under the apparent leadership of experienced former Saddam loyalists, the resistance network is growing more organized. Leaders of small cells that once acted independently now share intelligence and tactics and divide up targets. "They’re colonels, lieutenant colonels and majors who are really the hard-core loyalists," U.S. Major General Raymond Ordierno, commander of the 4th Infantry Division, tells TIME.

"Allah is Great": Not all the rank-and-file fighters are die-hard Saddam supporters. Many are thought to be devout Iraqi Muslims who believe that fighting “infidel” occupiers is a Koranic imperative. Tensions exist between former military officers and paid militia, called fedayeen in insurgent circles, and the Muslim fighters who label themselves mujahedin, or holy warrior. U.S. officials believe most of them then carry out missions under the orders of Saddam loyalists. "They use the fundamentalists as cannon fodder," especially for lethal attacks on soft targets involving car bombs, say the officials. "Suicide bombers are generally not Iraqis or former regime types." Abu Abdullah, who earns his living building houses along the Euphrates River , says, "Islam tells us that no one should occupy our land. The Koran allows us to kill anyone to defend our country."

The Terrorists -- "Down with the U.S.": Senior U.S. intelligence officials say a small number of dedicated terrorists slipped into the country just after the U.S. invasion. "They are burrowing way down, looking for opportunities to strike for maximum political impact," contends Senator Jack Reed, a Democrat who toured Iraq with colleague Hillary Clinton.

Mock Funerals for Soldiers Training to be Suicide Bombers: Some intelligence officials point a finger at Ansar al-Islam, a small Kurdish terror group that operated out of the northern mountains of Iraq against local Kurd rulers before the U.S. invasion. Intelligence officials say some of the highly trained men slipped away to regroup in Iran. Before the war, Ansar soldiers training to be suicide bombers were given elaborate mock funerals to prepare them mentally for their martyrdom.

How Bush Administration Portrays Insurgency: The Bush Administration, for its part, wants to portray the insurgency as mainly homegrown. That allows Washington to claim, as it repeatedly does, that when the die-hards run out of men and munitions the insurgency will dissipate. It also allows Bush to avoid the charge that the war actually increased danger to the U.S. by stirring up a hornet’s nest of terrorism. Yet the Administration’s greatest fear is that the rebellion will get too local if the general population turns on the occupiers. "We minimize their impact at our peril," says a Pentagon official.

New Effort to Blunt Insurgency: In a new effort to blunt the insurgency, the U.S. Central Command plans to form an Iraqi quick-reaction force that can identify and counter the guerillas better than the U.S. can.

What Really Happened in Samarra? In a companion story about the Nov. 30 battle near Samarra, where U.S. officials reported they had killed 54 Iraqi fighters, Bennett reports the dispute over the battle’s body count bears echoes of Vietnam, where casualty figures were routinely inflated. The U.S. has not been giving out such numbers in Iraq, but seemed eager to publicize this battle’s hefty total. Samarra hospital officials still insist that only eight Iraqis were killed, and last Monday afternoon TIME saw just two bodies lying in the hospital morgue: an elderly man and a middle-aged woman, both with Iranian identity cards. U.S. commanders stand by numbers they say were tallied from precise after-battle reports. Besides, says Brigadier General Mark Kimmitt, the Army’s deputy operations director, "I can’t imagine why the enemy would want to bring a dead body to the hospital."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: aidandcomfort; antiamericanism; aoltimewbturnercnn; bigmedia; enemy; iraq; iraqaftermath; iraqiterrorism; mediabias; terrorism; terrorists; time; timemag; waronterror; wot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461 next last
To: VOA
Looks like TIME is following CNN's "Blood For Interviews" policy that CNN had in gaining access to Saddam and his buddies for news reports.

Same company. AOLCNNTIMEWARNER (and a bunch of other stuff too. :

America Online
Time Warner Book Group
Time Warner Interactive Video
Time Inc.
Time Warner Cable
Entertainment & Networks Home Box Office
New Line Cinema

Turner Broadcasting System

TBS Superstation, TNT, Cartoon Network, Turner Classic Movies, Turner South, CNN/U.S., CNN Headline News, CNNfn, CNNRadio, and Boomerang, as well as the Company's many international language-specific networks

Warner Bros. Entertainment
Warner Music Group

421 posted on 12/08/2003 12:15:20 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: edskid
Frustrated? Actually, I'm exasperated, and I'm beyond being placated.

The other alternative is the one Claire Wolfe talks about.

422 posted on 12/08/2003 12:18:11 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
This certainly fits the Constitutional definition of Treason. Art. III section 3.

Treason against the United States shall consist only in levying war against them, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

They are both adhering to the enemies of the United States and giving them aid and comfort. They are free to publish whatever they want, but they are not free to go out on opps with terrorists to kill US troops.

423 posted on 12/08/2003 12:24:08 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You are one of my favorites!

I love seeing what you've got to say.
424 posted on 12/08/2003 12:39:00 PM PST by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs
You are one of my favorites! I love seeing what you've got to say.



Curtsey.

425 posted on 12/08/2003 12:53:10 PM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; All
But first, flip through the vile thing and find out who is supporting them with advertising dollars. Write them down, then write, fax and call them. Let them know we won't support companies who finance traitors.

Excellent advice. I don't have a copy and certainly don't plan on buying one. If an enterprising freeper could list a few of these advertisers, I'd be happy to write them. This is lower than low.

426 posted on 12/08/2003 12:58:20 PM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 416 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
But they have the ultimate protection: "Press immunity"
427 posted on 12/08/2003 1:01:57 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
(Among the very SOCIALIST/LIBERAL pictures, this one is very disturbing. Makes me sick.
428 posted on 12/08/2003 1:05:46 PM PST by SGCOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
There are no witnesses. Anyway, this is a non issue to the pols, the govt, and the sheeple.
429 posted on 12/08/2003 1:07:02 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 423 | View Replies]

To: BellStar
"I understand we put them back in power as head of PD's so the jerks can still snipe us with Gov. Issue fire power?!"

Good point. It's a fact.
430 posted on 12/08/2003 1:09:33 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 397 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
It seems as though all the issues important to FReepers are never campaign issues of late.

Another conspiracy?!
431 posted on 12/08/2003 1:11:22 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: StriperSniper
If the Repubs did not set new spending records...

The campaign issue SHOULD be: Who do you support? Reps or global socialists?

If I was running, I would attack a progressive opponent by pounding home the definition and how he is a socialist. Is that what America wants?...etc.
432 posted on 12/08/2003 1:15:02 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Is Victoria a stealth Dim, or is she loyal? I will be tuning in to see...
433 posted on 12/08/2003 1:17:24 PM PST by At _War_With_Liberals (Hey TIME, "No blood for interviews")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 390 | View Replies]

To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
The war is NOT officially over.

I pointed that out to them (TIME) in my return reply, and the fact that the email to me certainly confirmed their bias. So far, only the usual canned response was returned. I don't expect any real answer to that.

434 posted on 12/08/2003 1:21:59 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
"As a Pentagon official sees it: “They know they can’t beat us militarily, but they think they might be able to defeat us politically.” The guerrillas are trying to drive U.S. casualties so high that the American public turns against the war, he says, adding, "They could succeed."

And the Vast, LeftWing Medyuh Whore'd and the DemonRATS are playing right into the Terrorists' hands...MUD

435 posted on 12/08/2003 1:23:37 PM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: At _War_With_Liberals
She didn't suffer fools gladly in her press briefings.I believe the embeds were her idea.I liked her.
436 posted on 12/08/2003 1:24:22 PM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Thanks Dave, glad to see you over here. This is lower than low.
437 posted on 12/08/2003 1:29:50 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
The internet is a wonderful thing,so is google.I can see a new organization mentioned ,google and up pops some of the sponsors and it is tied to some socialist international group(s) many times.

As are, I am sure you are aware, the Peace groups that are marching across our nation reported by the media to be concerned citizens. ANSWER & Company.

438 posted on 12/08/2003 1:42:18 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: samtheman
We can't wait for the government to do it. We have to do it ourselves. Isn't there some way we can extend our reach, get the word out to more people? Sometimes I feel frustrated that so many good ideas are mentioned here in FR, but then die here, never seeing the public light of day.

This deserves a second reading!

439 posted on 12/08/2003 1:47:02 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 392 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002
First Amendment be damned - that's collusion with the enemy.

No need for that. The first amendment protects freedom of the press, not freedom to collaborate. They wouldn't be punished for printing the story, but for what they did to get it, not the same thing. Suppose they went on a "job" with a bank robber or burgler, how would that be any different? It would still be aiding and abbeting a crime, and this is still treason, by the Art III sec. 3 Constitutional definition.

440 posted on 12/08/2003 1:52:02 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460461 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson