Posted on 12/06/2003 9:20:08 PM PST by PeaceCorpsGuy
Instead of "the long march through the institutions, it should be titled "The Long March To The Institution."
For most of the Progressive Labor Party’s existence, we have believed that working-class soldiers and sailors are among the key forces to be won to communist revolution. Rather than serving the interests of U.S. bosses in imperialist adventures, we have urged GI’s—both from inside and outside the military—to "turn the guns around," and thereby fight for their class’s interests. Some may think this is wishful thinking, that the control of U.S. rulers over the military is ironclad. However, history proves that nothing could be further from the truth.For the last hundred years or more the weak link of modern capitalism has been the ruling class’s inability to field a reliable army. From the Spanish-American war up to the current wars in the Middle East and Yugoslavia, the world’s imperialists have faced rebellion from working class soldiers inside the ranks of capitalist armies. [...]
During WWII, the U.S. military did fight to some extent though not nearly as fiercely as the Red Armies. [... This communist -- being, like most, a nihilist at heart -- disdains the high regard the United States military showed for the lives of its soldiers, "workers" included. Only socialist armies that sent forth human waves and racked up casualties in the millions are to be respected.]
Ironically, among the most politically committed in the U.S. military were the tens of thousands of communists who volunteered. Rather than vowing to turn the guns around, they joined to fight for the U.S. as part of the united front against fascism. As soon as fascists were defeated, they were among those who organized large demonstrations of U.S. troops to "Bring the boys home," refusing to be used as tools of imperialism against other workers.
We've got some "dots" right here in the FreeRepublic.
These guys are always the same. They have never wanted troops anywhere for any reason. I would really like ot make them answer why-- not the gibberish they always make up fo reach instance. But really, why is it always wrong for the USA to use force to defend itself or to assert its will to its own self-interest? They are always such woolies.
March 20, 2004 Hollywood and Vine
If Dean's lead softens in favor of anyone but Kucinich before March 20, the fifth column media will be in the midst of an all-out effort to de-legitimize the Dem primaries.
Adding this incitement to the media abetted Stalinist uprisings planned for that date, and the increasing stridency of far-left rhetoric in recent weeks (Al Guardian's open advocacy of the assassination of George W. Bush, for instance) leads me to suspect that large-scale lethal violence is a definite possibility.
One likely scenario is that ANSWER agitprop pros will attempt to engineer an incident in which large numbers of rioters ("protestors") are killed either by police or by threatened civilians. This could then be represented as a "massacre" and the media could be counted upon to cooperate fully in exploiting it for ANSWER's purposes. Would Stalinist devils really sacrifice a large number of dupes for a propaganda coup and media ratings? Does anyone doubt that they would?
We are not occupying Iraq, we are mopping up the criminals who would return this country to a dictatorship replete with torture and starvation and trying to put the country on an even keel towards law and order. It took many years to help Germany to get on her feet as well as other EU countries. What is wrong with these people, they really want terrorism to continue?
Iraqis don't want the coalition to leave, they want us to stay until they are a more stable country with law and order from their citizens. This 'Global Day of Action" has to be the work of all Marxists and other rabble-rousers who don't want democracy in any form in the Middle East, certainly Arabia, Iran, Syria, and Palestine don't want any form of a Republic or democratic leadership by the people. - theirs are countries of corrupt dictators and dynastic rulers. Democracy would diminish they powers. So what these fools are really about is more terrorism – they have gotten Billions of dollars for education here in the US and have done nothing with it to improve the quality of learning, just feathered their own beds with the money; They want to socialize medicine and bankrupt the country so they don’t have to pay a dime ............here is a little fable familiar to all of us.......
THE LITTLE RED HEN
Once upon a time, on a farm in Texas, there was a little red hen who scratched about the barnyard until she uncovered quite a few grains of wheat.
She called all of her neighbors together and said, "If we plant this wheat, we shall have bread to eat. Who will help me plant it?"
"Not I," said the cow.
"Not I," said the duck.
"Not I," said the pig.
"Not I," said the goose.
"Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen.
And so she did. The wheat grew very tall and ripened into golden grain.
"Who will help me reap my wheat?" asked the little red hen.
"Not I," said the duck.
"Out of my classification," said the pig.
"I'd lose my seniority," said the cow.
"I'd lose my unemployment compensation," said the goose.
"Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen, and so she did.
At last it came time to bake the bread. "Who will help me bake the bread?" asked the little red hen.
"That would be overtime for me," said the cow.
"I'd lose my welfare benefits," said the duck.
"I'm a dropout and never learned how," said the pig.
"If I'm to be the only helper, that's discrimination," said the goose.
"Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen.
She baked five loaves and held them up for all of her neighbors to see.
They wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share. But the little red hen said, "No, I shall eat all five loaves."
"Excess profits!" cried the cow.
"Capitalist leech!" screamed the duck.
"I demand equal rights!" yelled the goose.
The pig just grunted in disdain.
And they all painted "Unfair!" picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.
Then a government agent came, he said to the little red hen, "You must not be so greedy."
"But I earned the bread," said the little red hen.
"Exactly," said the agent. "That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are lazy and idle."
And they all lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, "I am grateful, for now I truly understand."
But her neighbors became quite disappointed in her. She never again baked bread because she joined the "party" and got her bread free.
And all the Democrats smiled. 'Fairness' had been established. Individual initiative had died but nobody noticed; perhaps no one cared, as long as there was free bread.
Bill Clinton is getting $12 million for his memoirs. His wife Hillary got $8 million for hers. That's $20 million for memories from two people who for eight years repeatedly testified, under oath, that they couldn't remember anything.
God Bless America!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.