Skip to comments.
CURSING KERRY UNLEASHES
FOULMOUTHED ATTACK ON BUSH
New York Post ^
| 12/06/03
| DEBORAH ORIN
Posted on 12/06/2003 1:43:05 AM PST by kattracks
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:17:37 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
December 6, 2003 -- Struggling 2004 Democratic wannabe John Kerry fires an X-rated attack at President Bush over Iraq and uses the f-word - highly unusual language for a presidential contender - in a stunning new interview with Rolling Stone magazine. Sen. Kerry (Mass.) used the undeleted expletive to express his frustration and anger over how the Iraq issue has hurt him because he voted for the war resolution while Democratic front-runner Howard Dean has soared by opposing it.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; angrydems; fword; johnkerry; kerry
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161 next last
To: kattracks
Hellary has a foul mouth, like most liberals and the people love her.
121
posted on
12/06/2003 8:17:25 AM PST
by
cynicom
To: cynicom
They never see it printed in a quote or hear her do it.I am not saying it matters overall to her base,it is just smart politics not to indulge in public or in print!
122
posted on
12/06/2003 8:35:03 AM PST
by
MEG33
To: kattracks
Little Boy Bathroom. He lacks gravitas.
123
posted on
12/06/2003 9:44:40 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
( l = w + w. Two wrongs equal a left.)
To: kattracks
What a class act President, this guy would make.
124
posted on
12/06/2003 9:47:31 AM PST
by
MontanaBeth
(absolute power, corrupts absolutely)
To: Recovering_Democrat
In my entire life, this is the most pathetic thing I have ever witnessed by a leading Presidential Candidate. Kerry's behavior is indicative of a complete collapse within the rat party of the nomination procedure.
125
posted on
12/06/2003 9:49:21 AM PST
by
FormerACLUmember
(A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.)
To: kattracks
So... Did they airbrush his French-looking package?
126
posted on
12/06/2003 9:50:05 AM PST
by
Redcloak
(<Insert clever tagline here>)
To: SkyPilot
rotflmfao
To: BartMan1; Nailbiter
You can tell when a lib feels like he's losing - he brings out the verbail 'big artillery'... remind you of anyone?
128
posted on
12/06/2003 10:20:50 AM PST
by
IncPen
( The liberal's reward is self-disgust.)
To: kattracks
Just remember this about all the democRat candidates...THE MORE SCARED THEY ARE OF GEORGE BUSH, THE MORE VICIOUSLY THEY WILL ATTACK HIM.
But, it's getting to be like the boy who cried wolf, and most Americans are seeing the RATS for who they really are...the IMMORAL PARTY, which wants nothing for America except to be in CHARGE OF IT.
It's time the democRATic party met its demise. We don't need them, they are anti-American with little or no moral compass. They are eternal teen-agers with an axe to grind because someone along the trail denied them their way.
The overall good of the country has no meaning to them, only power and money. They accuse others of that they, themselves commit.
hillary (Note: I never spell a clintons' name with capital letters...none of them deserve it)...hillary and Dean want power so badly they are acting like rabid animals. I would worry if they got too close to Bush...they might do something drastic.
Is Bush handling things perfectly? Probably not, but who among us could handle the job perfectly? Certainly not a democRAT. There are so many factions, special interest groups, and sub-cultures out there, the only line that would fit would be Mr. Lincoln's..."you can make some of the people happy all of the time...etc" would apply.
Over the next two or three elections we should concentrate on ousting as many democRATS from Congress, as possible...at the state and federal level.
The grass roots folks can make this happen. While the special intests and the kooks get the media coverage, there is a quiet undercurrent that knows what it going on.
I see the democRATS like I looked at the Nazi's back in the 50's...hell bent on taking us down without firing a shot. They've worked a long way toward it, but I think we'll all stand up and stop them in the end.
We have to...we don't know how NOT to be a free people.
129
posted on
12/06/2003 10:27:43 AM PST
by
FrankR
To: Fledermaus
How dare you attack this fine Irish Catholic gentleman who has represented Massachusetts so well over the years! Someone from the DNC will be over to your home later and remove all Heinz products from your larder shelves.
To: kattracks
With language like that he is intentionally trying to appeal to the DUmmies. Be ready for a shower after you visit that site.
I think I read a post over there once that they would support the guy who used the "f" word the most... no really it is a true story. ;]
To: Diogenesis
LOL! Would the piper be representative of billy clinton or howard dean...and is the hillary and nancy dancing behind....lol...oh what the clintons and the dirtbags they brought with them to DC have done to the DNC. Imagine the likes of defacating harold ickes ( will never forget his threat to Larry Klayman during a deposition do his bathroom business on Larry's office floor...what a lowlife!) and ira magaziner or james carville, all hiding in the background, pulling strings and using dirtball detectives to clear the path.
Oh baby, the clintons lowered the bar and their mesmerized, characterless followers are all rushing to duck under it...too funny. What a bunch of crass humans.
Desparate.
Without character.
Up against a man of incredible honor and character.
This is truly going to wake our nation up.
To: kattracks
2 words. F'in loser.
To: kattracks
At first Kerry said he wanted the media to use the F in his name. When it didn't help, he dropped it. Now he's using the F word again. At least now we know what the F stands for. John F'in Kerry.
To: Bon mots
San Hill, Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones
![](http://www.theforce.net/multimedia/archive/Images/Episode_2/Characters/San_Hill/aotc-san_hill02.jpg)
Hey John! Why the long face?
135
posted on
12/06/2003 10:43:59 AM PST
by
Momaw Nadon
(The mind is like a parachute. It doesn't work unless it's open.)
To: Radix
I can't help but wonder if his nutcase wife,Ter-ay-sa, isn't making his life unbearable. I've always felt that this woman wants to be First Lady so badly she can taste it.
136
posted on
12/06/2003 11:04:29 AM PST
by
surrey
To: gipper81
Did I mention I am a Viet Nam vet ?
Kerry did serve as an officer in the U.S. Navy during the Vietnam War. And he did win a Silver Star and three Purple Hearts. So far, so good. But when he returned home, he became a war protester. In America, of course, everybody is free to agree or disagree with a government policy. But Kerry did not just disagree; he became a leader of groups that championed our nations foes while our forces were still fighting and dying.
In 1971, the Communist Daily World delightedly published photos of him speaking to demonstrators as a leader of Vietnam Veterans Against the War (VVAW). The April 23, 1971 Daily World boasted that the marchers displayed a banner depicting a portrait of Communist Party leader Angela Davis, who was on record stating: "I am dedicated to the overthrow of your system of government and your society."
By frequently participating in VVAWs demonstrations, Kerry found himself marching alongside what the Boston Herald Traveler identified as "revolutionary Communists." While noting that known Reds had openly organized these events, the December 12, 1971 Herald Traveler reported the presence of an "abundance of Vietcong flags, clenched fists raised in the air, and placards plainly bearing legends in support of China, Cuba, the USSR, North Korea and the Hanoi government."
Seeking election to the U.S. House in 1972, Kerry found it necessary to suppress reproduction of the cover picture appearing on his own book, The New Soldier. His political opponent pointed out that it depicted several unkempt youths crudely handling an American flag to mock the famous photo of the U.S. Marines at Iwo Jima. Suddenly, copies of the book became unavailable and even disappeared from libraries. But the Lowell (Mass.) Sun said of the type of person shown on its cover: "These people spit on the flag, they burn the flag, they carry the flag upside down, [and] they all but wipe their noses with it in their efforts to show their contempt for everything it still stands for."
During the 1972 "Kerry for Congress" campaign, flyers invited voters to "hear Ramsey Clark, former Attorney General, who has just recently returned from a visit in North Vietnam." While in Hanoi, Clark had distinguished himself by roundly condemning the United States, heaping praise on his Communist hosts, and lecturing American prisoners of war.
In May 1972, the Boston Phoenix reported that Kerry had defiantly given his medals back to the U.S. government during one of his many protests. New York Times columnist Bill Keller wrote in September 2002 that the senator invited him to view 40 minutes of films Kerry made depicting his war exploits. Keller wrote that anti-war doves would still support the man they remembered for "throwing his war ribbons onto the steps of the Capitol." When pressed about what happened to his medals, Kerry now says the medals he threw away were not his and that his are displayed in his Senate office. Retired General George S. Patton III would later angrily charge that Kerrys actions had "given aid and comfort to the enemy."
Supremely arrogant and demonstrably contemptuous of the voting public, Kerry nevertheless regularly touts his military experience during his presidential run. But he forfeited the right to do that 30 years ago. Come to think of it, if he continues to posture as a war hero, hell lose the friendship of Ramsey Clark, Angela Davis, and the Daily World.
To: kattracks
What is it with this jerk? Never standing behind his own decisions unless they happen to be popular.
To: xm177e2; Fledermaus
How about Waco(torture and mass murder) and how about Juanita Broderick? Yes Fledermaus was right...they are no better than Ba'athists.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160, 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson