Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/05/2003 9:43:48 AM PST by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: presidio9
And here we have San Francisco with all it's feces smeared streets and urine scented parks.
2 posted on 12/05/2003 9:46:45 AM PST by battlegearboat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Maybe Morford's acid will disolve him one day and deprive us of his wit.
3 posted on 12/05/2003 9:46:49 AM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
This wrapped up my holiday catalogue offerings. (to name but a few)
4 posted on 12/05/2003 9:49:06 AM PST by stanz (Those who don't believe in evolution should go jump off the flat edge of the Earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
The Abercrombie catalog is, by the way, not sold to anyone under 18. It has a cover warning of "Mature content."

Interesting that in the furor here on FR, this little detail was left out....

5 posted on 12/05/2003 9:49:14 AM PST by Hodar (With Rights, comes Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Note to scrunchy parents: I'd be far, far more worried about what, say, Kraft is selling to your kids in all those millions of boxes of toxic and openly poisonous Kraft Lunchables than about some quasi-sexy yuppie-fashion catalog they never even see. But that's just me.

Oh, but here. Here is the safe, saccharine J. Crew catalog, all bland white former sorority girls and carefully emasculated boys and a smattering of safe black persons, all with incredibly clean teeth and nifty haircuts and big happy smiles playfully tossing snowballs at each other in their new J. Crew scarves, only $29.99. Oh yes, that's much better.

And here we have the L.L. Bean catalog, featuring those exact same J. Crew models about 10 years later, doing the exact same smiley snowbound activities, only with more gray hair and a higher credit limit and less sexual activity and lots more monogrammed luggage. How disturbing. I feel sort of violated just looking at it.

How can he say things like this and get away with it?

7 posted on 12/05/2003 9:52:25 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Pero treinta miles al resto.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Is this really a Morford column? I saw no mention of Bush or Ashcroft (though, to be honest, I find it difficult to read his trash all that closely).
9 posted on 12/05/2003 9:57:16 AM PST by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Meanwhile, Abercrombie is thrilled. The latest round of reactionary screeching is exactly the outcry they were counting on, as they yank the sexy catalog from the shelves just as the news of its raciness hits the media, thus resulting in an instant wave of interest among their target market: a.k.a., those youths who simply love it when parents get all pissy and fumy about interesting types of sex they no longer have.

Well, maybe not. Sales were down 13%. The kids may love it but it's the adults who have signature authority on the ol' VISA.

Now, as far as all catalogs being soft porn, Miss Morford probably has a point. I await with glee my Northern Tools catalog...generators...hubba hubba...

10 posted on 12/05/2003 9:57:23 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
It must be profound, because I don't understand a word of it.
12 posted on 12/05/2003 9:58:51 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Morford is right, I tell you! He's right! Right, that Stanford students are ineptly dressed. Or at least they were when I was there (AB '89, History & Poli Sci). Maybe because with tuition and fees of (now) over $35k a year, and some 70+ percent of students getting financial aid, they can't bloody afford many new clothes, let alone Abercrombie-wear. (One wonders at what vastly PUBLICLY-SUBSIDIZED institutions of higher learning MORFORD spent several years sodomizing, on the dime of me and other CA taxpayers.)

He's about as "right" as usual on everything else, however.
16 posted on 12/05/2003 10:05:38 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Still, Maryam Kubasek of the National Coalition for the Protection of Children and Families (hello, red flag of rigid sanctimony) apparently thinks the catalog is literally capable of stripping her young son naked and plying him with massage oil and anal beads and a nice Burntbridge Pond Striped Polo shirt with moose embroidery for $39.99. Oh the horror.

A little bit of projection on the part of the author, I think.

18 posted on 12/05/2003 10:07:32 AM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
This walking puddle of puke called Morford is a pathic wretch. If he thinks he's the PJ O'Rourke of the wild-eyed left, he's more than wrong.

However, he's right about this:

"I'd be far, far more worried about what, say, Kraft is selling to your kids in all those millions of boxes of toxic and openly poisonous Kraft Lunchables..."

Why any parent would give that horrible crap to their kids is beyond me.
23 posted on 12/05/2003 10:16:15 AM PST by Ribeye (Protective head wear courtesy of Reynolds Aluminum Products)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Only Morford would get off at the thought of Kitchen Aid mixers. I hate to think of what (s)he would do with a dough hook...
29 posted on 12/05/2003 10:26:28 AM PST by ArrogantBustard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
I think this is another leftist anti-capitalism diatribe - defending a leftist ideas by putting down the catalogs of companies that don't cater to his crowd (LL Bean, J Crew, Pottery Barn Kids, etc.).

BTW, why didn't he mention Victoria's Secret? He probably thinks that catalog is...yucky!
31 posted on 12/05/2003 10:32:40 AM PST by ILBBACH (All your teams are belong to us! GO CHIEFS!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Still, Maryam Kubasek of the National Coalition for the Protection of Children and Families ... apparently thinks the catalog is literally capable of stripping her young son naked and plying him with massage oil and anal beads and a nice Burntbridge Pond Striped Polo shirt with moose embroidery for $39.99.

If anyone knows about stripping young sons naked and plying massage oil and anal beads, it's Morford.

33 posted on 12/05/2003 10:43:37 AM PST by spodefly (This is my tagline. There are many like it, but this one is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
I mean, whatever happened to the innocent and tantalizing catalogs of yore, like the 4-inch-thick Sears tome with its countless pages of busty bra models who looked like your best friend's mom?

I always thought the mom from Family Circus had a nice rack.

38 posted on 12/05/2003 11:02:22 AM PST by Jim Cane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
slabs of steaming gourmet meats being perfectly sliced with spotless $200 Wusthof knives. Mmm yeah, baby. Do it to me just like that.

This is one seriously disturbed pervert. It gives me the shivers to think that both my "senators" come from Sodom by the Bay and owe their office to people like Morford.

41 posted on 12/05/2003 11:19:37 AM PST by Bernard Marx (I have noted that persons with bad judgment are most insistent that we do what they think best.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Whatever happened to fantasizing all the way through the panty selection in the JCPenney catalog?

Um, Mark. The rest of us weren't fantasising about wearing the panties.

< SD

42 posted on 12/05/2003 11:52:14 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
Here comes Ms. Morford again to bravely take on the world of the normal.
45 posted on 12/05/2003 12:25:19 PM PST by Gritty ("Prayer: the only kind of speech the First Amendment doesn't protect.."-Rush Limbaugh on academics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: presidio9
alot of this article is hilarious. I just did the C&B, PB, and W&S thing with the wife and came away thinking alot of the same things.

Conservatives need to get over Abercrombie.
48 posted on 12/05/2003 2:24:18 PM PST by Cosmo (Liberalism is for Girls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson