Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dean: I'd 'Break Up' Fox News
NewsMax.com ^ | 12/02/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 12/02/2003 10:06:24 AM PST by kattracks

Democratic presidential front-runner Howard Dean pledged Monday night to "break up" the Fox News Channel along with other conservative news outlets owned by media baron Rupert Murdoch.

"Eleven companies in this country control 90 percent of what ordinary people are able to read and watch on their television," the ex-Vermont governor complained to MSNBC's Chris Matthews, who then asked the candidate point-blank:

"Would you break up Fox? ... Rupert Murdoch has 'The Weekly Standard.' It has got a lot of other interests. It has got the New York Post. Would you break it up?"

Dean shot back, "On ideological grounds, absolutely yes."

A moment later the "Hardball" host pressed: "Seriously. As a public policy, would you bring industrial policy to bear and break up these conglomerations of power?"

At that point Dean seemed to sense that he had gone too far and began to equivocate, saying, "I don't want to answer whether I would break up Fox or not."

The leading Democrat then explained, "What I'm going to do is appoint people to the FCC that believe democracy depends on getting information from all portions of the political spectrum, not just one."



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; dean; deanoweirdo; foxnews; howarddean
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last
To: All
can you imagine how many stupid things this guy says before november?
There is no way he wins Mass. or Minn.
I am stunned that dems are not in panic mode yet.
Just gets better and better.
41 posted on 12/02/2003 10:25:52 AM PST by genghis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Folks I would not take his remarks lightly. I have always said that once the Democrats control both houses of congress and the presidency, the first thing they are going to do is try and restore the "Fairness Doctrine" to the media. This law said basically, the airwaves had to offer both sides equally of controversial issues.. The FCC dissolved it in 1987 after being the law for nearly 40 years. For more about the "Fairness Doctrine" go here:http://www.museum.tv/archives/etv/F/htmlF/fairnessdoct/fairnessdoct.htm
42 posted on 12/02/2003 10:26:20 AM PST by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
The hitler howler monkey dean, is a scary dictator wannabe. He makes my blood run cold. He plans to destroy FOX to replace it with his propaganda machine along with cbs,nbc,cnn,abc, lat,nyt,wp,bg,.... dean is dangerous to everybody's health, and he is a doctor?
43 posted on 12/02/2003 10:28:51 AM PST by desertcry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If you let most MarxistSocialistLiberalDemocrats talk long enough..their true colors will come thru. The problem is getting the "deafdumb&blind" sheeple to notice..what their "leaders" are actually saying.

FRegards,

44 posted on 12/02/2003 10:29:26 AM PST by Osage Orange (Left is Right. Right is Wrong. Up is Down....And Down is now Up. Got that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I would expect there to be an effort to destory conservative media outlets when the next Democrat assumes the White House. I know Al Gore for one has a bone to pick with conservative media outlets. And Dems realize there recent failures have had a lot to do with the influence of a conservative media outlets. This is why I implore all Freepers to be heartened and staunchly support the GOP efforts to maintain the White House. Otherwise you may lose more of your money, your guns, your favorite news outlets, and even possibly your property.
45 posted on 12/02/2003 10:31:28 AM PST by miloklancy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Ed_NYC; MonroeDNA; widgysoft; Springman; Timesink; dubyaismypresident; Grani; coug97; ...
Sounds like Howard Dean would like to be "The NEW Number Two."

Just damn.

If you want on the new list, FReepmail me. This IS a high-volume PING list...

46 posted on 12/02/2003 10:31:40 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Welp, now we know what kind of Pres. Dean will make.

A fascist one.

Even Alan Keyes or other ultra-conservatives wouldn't want to shut down the mangestream media.
47 posted on 12/02/2003 10:32:08 AM PST by Killborn (I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doctor Stochastic
Where's the hammer-throwing chick in the red track suit?

Ask, and ye shall receive...


48 posted on 12/02/2003 10:33:13 AM PST by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Brubricker
You wrote:

"Whadda surprise. Newsmax tells more bald-faced lies. Same ole Newsmax."

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\

Care to point them out....? Are you saying that Dean never said what is quoted in the article?

49 posted on 12/02/2003 10:33:37 AM PST by Osage Orange (Left is Right. Right is Wrong. Up is Down....And Down is now Up. Got that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Eleven companies in this country control 90 percent of what ordinary people are able to read and watch on their television,"

Well, well, isn’t that just so elitist! All the time with the libs they have the attitude of looking down on the "ordinary Americans" Anyone remember emperor klintonius referring to "ordinary Americans" having "too many freedoms?"

50 posted on 12/02/2003 10:34:13 AM PST by TLI (...........ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Howard Dean For Amerika!
51 posted on 12/02/2003 10:34:28 AM PST by leadpencil1 (Kill your television)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miloklancy
Hmmm. I don't see the "there's no difference between the parties" crowd on this thread.
52 posted on 12/02/2003 10:36:28 AM PST by colorado tanker ("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
wOw
53 posted on 12/02/2003 10:39:58 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (Democrat party: The party of death and slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The stupidity about this is he can't do it. That would violate freedom of expression and speech from the Constitution. Even Dean isn't that stupid...well......
54 posted on 12/02/2003 10:41:03 AM PST by Redwood71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
Howard Dean is MEAN!
55 posted on 12/02/2003 10:41:29 AM PST by Pippin ( "We did not charge hundreds of miles into the heart of Iraq..only to retreat before a band of thugs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: surelyclintonsbaddream
Scary liberal ping.
56 posted on 12/02/2003 10:43:13 AM PST by scott7278
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: desertcry
He plans to destroy FOX to replace it with his propaganda machine

It's all part of an integrated propaganda campaign that's currently going full-force. The assaults on Rush, the vanden Heuvel drivel last night on O'Reilly, the eructation of "attack" books from the likes of Franken, Moore, Ivins ad nauseum; the propaganda about having to establish a "liberal" radio network just to be able "to be heard", yada-yada-yada. It's more outlandish Big Lie smoke and mirrors from the neocommunist Left.

They figure most Americans are too stupid to realize that ABC-CBS-NBC-PBS-CNN-NPR are all on the neocommunist team, and that Fox is on the extreme "dangerous" far-raving-right. The fact they're actually getting some traction with this is truly frightening to me. Fox is the only network that currently presents both sides of stories. That's threatening and unacceptable to the totalitarian Left.

57 posted on 12/02/2003 10:43:39 AM PST by Bernard Marx (Experience is wonderful: it allows us to recognize a mistake when we make it again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

58 posted on 12/02/2003 10:44:25 AM PST by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; billhilly
The #1 reason I vote Republican is because I believe a Democratic victory would result in wholesale government harassment of conservative media. In the 90's we had the "hush rush" laws and the shameful justice deparment vendetta against The American Spectator.

This thread bolsters that conviction.
59 posted on 12/02/2003 10:45:49 AM PST by murdoog (i just changed my tag line)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Would he break up Time-Warner and Viacom? Would he break up Hollywood?
60 posted on 12/02/2003 10:45:50 AM PST by Moby Grape
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-187 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson