Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

“Field Guide” Bye-Bye: Abercrombie and Fitch stops selling porn.
National Review Online ^ | December 01, 2003 | Anne Morse

Posted on 12/01/2003 1:10:03 PM PST by nickcarraway

In matters of foreign policy, Teddy Roosevelt advised, one should speak softly and carry a big stick. Last month tens of thousands of Americans applied that advice to a vexing domestic matter. Their "big stick" was the threat of a nationwide boycott of one of Roosevelt's favorite stores, Abercrombie and Fitch.

The threat worked. Four days before the official start of the Christmas shopping season — Abercrombie, known for overpriced clothes and underdressed models — ordered its 651 stores to stop selling "The Christmas Field Guide," the latest edition of the company's pornographic quarterly magazine. It's evidently the start of a permanent ban on selling the quarterly in stores, and it's evidence that when enough people get mad — and take action — even the most libertine companies will sometimes back down.

Abercrombie's quarterly has long angered parents and others concerned about cultural decay. The 2003 Christmas issue features dozens of naked young men and women in various sexual poses, including group sex. The pictures are accompanied by a column from a "sexpert" who, among other lewd advice, suggests readers engage in oral sex in movie theaters "so long as you do not disturb those around you."

Earlier editions featured pictures of Santa in sadomasochistic poses with his elves, drinking tips, advice on seducing everyone from teachers to nuns, and a recommendation that students "negotiate a special group rate at a local motel, which your entire quad can take advantage of." A&F recently outraged parents by marketing, to seven-year-old girls, thong-style panties featuring slogans like "Eye Candy" and "Wink Wink."

I visited an A&F store at the Montgomery Mall in Bethesda, Maryland last Wednesday. I was planning to write a story about the quarterly, and wanted to see a copy for myself. But when I got to the counter, the sales associate told me they were no longer selling the Christmas issue. This was confirmed by store manager Matt Willard, who said all A&F stores were ordered to stop selling the quarterly last Tuesday. Store managers were given no explanation for the decision, he said.

I called Abercrombie's national headquarters in New Albany, Ohio to confirm this. CEO Mike Jeffries and his staff were not available, but an employee who gave his name as "Brennan" said the company had been, over the last two weeks, received 300 calls per hour from people announcing they were boycotting A&F stores until the clothier stopped selling the quarterly. The decision to yank the Christmas issue from stores was made at the beginning of Thanksgiving week, he added.

Who was behind the boycotts?

"Ever hear of Dr. Dobson?" Brennan asked.

James Dobson of Focus on the Family recently spent a radio program and an appearance on MSNBC's Scarborough Country urging listeners to boycott Abercrombie until it stopped publishing the quarterly.

Dobson was joined in his efforts by former Redskins coach Joe Gibbs, Chuck Colson, the American Decency Association (ADA), the National Coalition for the Protection of Children and Families, and others.

Pressure on A&F may also have come from another source: Corporations that own other stores. Bill Johnson, says that his group had come up with a unique new strategy for getting a Grand Rapids, Michigan A&F to not only stop selling its raunchy quarterly, but also to get rid of the huge photographs of naked models that decorate the walls of every A&F store.

Discussions with Abercrombie and the manager of the Rivertown Crossings Mall in Grand Rapids had gone nowhere. So Johnson sent a letter to the managers of all 120 mall stores expressing concerns about what children visiting the mall were being exposed to. He enclosed several photos from A&F's quarterly. Police yourselves, he warned, or we'll urge people to boycott the entire mall — right at the start of the Christmas shopping season.

Johnson immediately heard from two stores, including the manager of one of the mall's largest department stores. In the last two weeks there have been, Johnson says, "significant discussions" between the corporation that owns the department store and Abercrombie, leading the ADA to agree to agree to delay the boycott.

The mainstreaming of porn is nothing new. What outrages many parents is that Abercrombie is deliberately aiming its porn and damaging lifestyle advice, not at dirty old men, but at kids.

The best news is the lasting Christmas gift Abercrombie is giving to America. When I tried to order a "Field Guide" by telephone, an A&F employee told me the company's decision to keep the quarterly out of stores is permanent. She, too, blamed the boycotts. The only people who will have access to the quarterly in future, she added, are those who already have a subscription. It's a huge step forward.

A&F's CEO Mike Jeffries has for years sneered at those who complained about his quarterly's filth. Asking him softly to clean up his act didn't work, but big stick evidently did.

- Anne Morse is a freelance writer in Virginia.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Maryland; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: abercrombie; abercrombiefitch; boycott; catholiclist; children; clintonlegacy; culturewar; doasthouwillisthelaw; drdobson; hedonists; ifitfeelsgooddoit; libertines; permissivesociety; promiscuity; sexualizingchildren; society
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last
To: NotQuiteCricket
Very funny.
21 posted on 12/01/2003 3:13:25 PM PST by jjm2111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Interesting. I always thought A&F marketed to rich college kids living off mamma and daddy. Who else would pay $40 for a pre-distressed (worn out) gimme cap? I can't imagine anyone who listens to James Dobson ever buying anything at A&F anyway.
22 posted on 12/01/2003 3:17:06 PM PST by Richard Kimball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Pressure on A&F may also have come from another source: Corporations that own other stores. Bill Johnson, says that his group had come up with a unique new strategy for getting a Grand Rapids, Michigan A&F to not only stop selling its raunchy quarterly, but also to get rid of the huge photographs of naked models that decorate the walls of every A&F store.

This is interesting, because I was thinking of doing much the same thing with the local mall and its ownership and the other stores in the mall, especially those neighboring the A & F store.

23 posted on 12/01/2003 3:19:37 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
The catalog was not offered for free - it cost $ in the stores.
24 posted on 12/01/2003 3:21:41 PM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
To my knowlege they've never received one red cent of mine. Guess I've boycotted them all along without realizing. Good.

Prairie
25 posted on 12/01/2003 3:28:57 PM PST by prairiebreeze (They aren't attackers, militants, assailants, insugents or resistors. They are THE ENEMY!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjm2111
No Deal. I could never tend T.R.'s grave again if I were to sell him out to this. His grave and old house is an Official Muttly Favorite Place...and when I get back there, I will visit with a whole heart and clear conscience again.
26 posted on 12/01/2003 3:37:57 PM PST by PoorMuttly (DO, or DO NOT. There is no TRY - Yoda)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
My young daughter received one of their porno magazines disguised as a shopping catalog about six years ago.

I called and really blasted them for sending this to colleges around the country. Of course at that time they just got even more vulgar and crass even sending the next catalog with a drinking game on the back cover.

Nice to see families taking the time to demand the end to this garbage.

27 posted on 12/01/2003 4:02:19 PM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
A&F's CEO Mike Jeffries

Would molest his own childern, in my Not-so humble opinion.
28 posted on 12/01/2003 4:02:56 PM PST by glaseatr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: glaseatr
You know what's so ironic? The same people who screamed about a cartoon camel selling cigarettes would influence children to smoke, are the same people today making these Corporate decisions with the excuse that advertising doesn't sway the way children behave.
29 posted on 12/01/2003 4:09:54 PM PST by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: glaseatr
There's no money in that.
30 posted on 12/01/2003 4:29:48 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
At the mall in Syracuse, the have have naked guys standing at the front of the store, just inside, with a woman, dressed, IMHO, not much better. It's disgusting.
31 posted on 12/01/2003 4:38:36 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Hmmm...

I fail to see any marketing logic to using naked models to sell clothes.

VietVet
32 posted on 12/01/2003 8:04:13 PM PST by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
But too late; I'll never shop there again.

I'll do one even better: I'll never shop there, period. Besides, their clothing is a bit too, ahem, trendy (read overpriced yuppie geekwear) for me.

33 posted on 12/01/2003 8:09:15 PM PST by EricT. (Californian by birth, Tennessean by choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: eno_; nickcarraway
Great. If God meant us to be naked we would have been born... Oh. Never mind.

Well, as the story goes, He DID mean for us to be naked. Apparently, we proved that we weren't able to handle our few meager responsibilities, and we had to "put on our clothes and leave the pool"...
34 posted on 12/01/2003 8:11:00 PM PST by beezdotcom ("I'm naked, right here under my clothes...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: VietVet
I sat outside the store, watching passersby. You should have SEEN ALL the teen girls...as soon as he caught their eye (as they walked by, window-shopping at first), they giggled, stopped in their tracks and wandered back, and walked right into the store, giggling the entire time while in the store, as well....I could see this behavior, as well, as the front window was the entire width of the store, right in front of where I sat. Many walked out with packages.
35 posted on 12/01/2003 8:13:16 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; GatorGirl; maryz; *Catholic_list; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; ...
A must read again. Sadly it becomes numbing.
36 posted on 12/01/2003 8:19:09 PM PST by narses ("The do-it-yourself Mass is ended. Go in peace" Francis Cardinal Arinze of Nigeria)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
They had a real naked guy? I thought you meant a large poster of a naked guy.

Isn't there a city ordinance about indecent exposure?
37 posted on 12/01/2003 8:47:59 PM PST by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
He had no shoes and no shirt...he had on jeans. His chest appeared to have been oiled, as it shined in the light. The young woman standing next to him, obviously another employee, wore a low cut, see through top, exposing her mid-drift, on this particular day. Although, I would say that, generally speaking, each time I have passed by the store, and they have these live "props," that is always their type of attire (or non-attire). Because he private areas were not shown, I'm sure they complied with "decency" laws. However, IMHO, this was indecent, as the intent of the non-attire was to attract attention by young teen girls for the purpose of selling merchandise. I find that disgusting.
38 posted on 12/01/2003 9:04:31 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
(shakes head in disbelief)

Where were their PARENTS?

VietVet
39 posted on 12/01/2003 9:22:13 PM PST by VietVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: VietVet
I assume a) shopping in other stores..."meetcha later" or b) dropped and run..."pick ya up later".
40 posted on 12/01/2003 9:24:25 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson