Skip to comments.
THERE THEY GO AGAIN (Conservatives had nothing to protest in The Reagans mini-hatchet series)
New York Post ^
| November 30, 2003
| ADAM BUCKMAN
Posted on 11/30/2003 5:49:31 PM PST by OESY
Edited on 05/26/2004 5:17:34 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
If it was about the three-hour miniseries I just watched - "The Reagans," which finally hits the air tonight at 8 on Showtime - then the people who made such a big stink about it look like a bunch of loony, paranoid alarmists.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: brolin; cbs; davis; garbage; haig; hitpiece; mooves; nancyhatchetjob; reagans; thereagans
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
1
posted on
11/30/2003 5:49:32 PM PST
by
OESY
To: OESY
If there was nothing that ticked people all (many people, not only conservatives) then why didn't the network just air it?
Seems to me the beef should be with the network denying the film a needed vote of confidence.
2
posted on
11/30/2003 5:51:14 PM PST
by
HitmanLV
(I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
To: OESY; PhiKapMom; dixiechick2000; Howlin; nopardons
Well, I wouldn't expect Adam-democrat-left-wing-Reagan-hater-Buckman to be offended by anything that's untrue so long as it incorrectly paints the greatest president of the last century in an unflattering light.
3
posted on
11/30/2003 5:53:18 PM PST
by
onyx
To: OESY
"It is also not historically accurate, which is a problem for TV movies of this kind, but an area I'll leave to historians to sort out.
"The Reagans" is, however, a typical made-for-TV movie - melodramatic, clichéd, a bit disjointed, and a little cheesy in some of its settings and re-creations."
That pretty well sums things up, IMO. Now, let's make "The Clintons", historically inaccurate, melodramatic, cliched, a bit disjointed, and a little cheesy...and see if the liberal crowd sits by quietly.
4
posted on
11/30/2003 5:58:17 PM PST
by
Maria S
("…the end is near…this time, Americans are serious; Bush is not like Clinton." Uday Hussein 4/9/03)
To: Senator Kunte Klinte
This piece ran with a sidebar entitled "The Reagans Exposed: Ten Things you didn't know about 'The Reagans,' the ill-fated, made-for-CBS miniseries."
IMHO, "there they go again" should apply to TV critics like the New York Post's Buckman who will make every excuse to avoid criticizing a liberal who might buy their newspaper. Like the Post, Buckman just doesn't get it, i.e., doesn't understand the episode. Liberals said, if roles were reversed, and a liberal icon was trashed with a lot of fabricated nonsense, leftists wouldn't protest, but then came the series on JFK and Camelot. So the premise of their argument was wrong: no liberal broadcast TV network trashed Kennedy. LBJ was fair game on the History Channel, but that is not the same thing as attacking JFK's integrity, or The Reagan's integrity.
But that's my opinion. What follows are brief descriptions of segments comprising "The Reagans" series, as reported by the Media Research Center. You decide.
Excerpts from CyberAlert, Media Research Center, November 25, 2003
...
3. Director & Producer of The Reagans Movie Blast CBS's Moonves
In a conference call with reporters on Monday, the director and a producer of The Reagans mini-series, as well as Showtime's programming chief, on whose network the movie will air this Sunday night after CBS Chairman Les Moonves rejected it, blasted Moonves for calling the movie unbalanced and for claiming he was unaware of its content as it was being filmed. Both CBS and Showtime are owned by Viacom.
4. Preview of What Script Suggests We'll See Sunday on The Reagans
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime this Sunday night, which CBS had rejected, compiled by the MRC's Rich Noyes from a shooting script posted earlier this month by Salon.com. Part 1 of 7: Overview and Caveats. If the final product follows the outline of the script that Salon posted, it will present a liberal caricature of the Reagan administration with an often befuddled and lost Ronald Reagan following the instructions of others. Reagan's conservative policies are presented as cruel or counterproductive; successes such as the end of the Cold War are painted as totally independent of Reagan's conservative thinking.
5. Showtime's The Reagans: Reaganomics Victimized the Poor
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime. Part 2 of 7: Reaganomics victimized the poor. The script makes no reference to the booming U.S. economy during the 1980s, but is peppered with references to cruel budget cuts and the homeless.
6. Reagan Won the Cold War by Overcoming Conservative Warmongers
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime. Part 3 of 7: Reagan won the Cold War by overcoming conservative warmongers.
7. Showtime's The Reagans: "Idiot" Reporters Supported Reagan
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime. Part 4 of 7: "Idiot" reporters supported Reagan.
8. The Reagans Centers Narrative on Reagan Flummoxed by Iran-Contra
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime. Part 5 of 7: Conniving by Reagan's staff led to Iran-contra, which is portrayed as a scandal of the same magnitude as Nixon's Watergate.
9. Showtime: Reagan Began Losing Faculties at Start of Presidency
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime. Part 6 of 7: Reagan began losing his faculties almost as soon as he became President.
10. Showtime Movie: Reagans as a Dysfunctional American Family
Preview of 'The Reagans' movie on Showtime. Part 7 of 7: The Reagan family as dysfunctional.
5
posted on
11/30/2003 6:00:12 PM PST
by
OESY
To: OESY
Buckman saw a heavily edited version. Who can say what unedited slanders would have made it into the CBS broadcast had not irate conservatives forced CBS president Leslie Moonves to cave and consign it to Showtime?
6
posted on
11/30/2003 6:00:21 PM PST
by
beckett
To: Maria S
let's make "The Clintons" I don't know. If you watch an episode of the "Sopranos" and one of "Sex and the City", it would pretty much cover it all.
7
posted on
11/30/2003 6:22:14 PM PST
by
lizma
To: OESY
ADAM BUCKMANThis myopic no-talent gets paid to write this?
Now thats what I call corporate welfare!.
8
posted on
11/30/2003 6:26:36 PM PST
by
Rome2000
(McCarthy was right!)
To: Maria S
That pretty well sums things up, IMO. Now, let's make "The Clintons", historically inaccurate, melodramatic, cliched, a bit disjointed, and a little cheesy...and see if the liberal crowd sits by quietly. You mean "Now, let's make "The clintons", historically accurate, undramatic, perfectly true to facts, jointed, and not a bit cheesy...and see if the liberal crowd sits by quietly."
9
posted on
11/30/2003 6:41:03 PM PST
by
Outraged
To: OESY
If there is one thing I hat, it's the dumb-assed patronizing lefties calling us small minded. Educational elitism at its worst.
10
posted on
11/30/2003 6:56:36 PM PST
by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: OESY
If there is one thing I hate, it's the dumb-assed patronizing lefties calling us small minded. Educational elitism at its worst.
11
posted on
11/30/2003 6:57:17 PM PST
by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: OESY
There is nothing to fuss about if you believe the premise of the lies portrayed in the movie, that Ronald was a dufuss and Nancy was a nasty bitch. Anyone who has any clue would be offended the outright lies of the movie.
To: Outraged
You mean "Now, let's make "The clintons", historically accurate, undramatic, perfectly true to facts, jointed, and not a bit cheesy...and see if the liberal crowd sits by quietly." Part of the script is already written. It's called The Starr Report and the left was not too quiet about that being published. No ridiculous script dreamed up by a right-wing scriptwriter could be more damning than the truth about BJ Clinton.
13
posted on
11/30/2003 7:21:33 PM PST
by
eggman
(Social Insecurity - Who will provide for the government when the government provides for all of us?)
To: OESY
I didn't see it, won't see it, am glad very few others saw it, and this is now a non-story that I will gladly put in that great cosmic wastebasket of the mind known as "I just don't care any longer what this guy is irked about that is causing him to take so many cheap shots at conservatives." We won, he lost, case is closed forever.
To: onyx
I don't know Adam Buckman from a hole in the ground.
Apparently, that's a GOOD thing.
15
posted on
11/30/2003 8:10:20 PM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
To: OESY
Itwill be interesting to hear what Michael Reagan says about it tomorrow.
To: vpintheak
Got it right that time; pisses me off too. I can reed and spell guud to. I went to USL! Hey, like you I get the chu rouge with pundits that cloak us with a stereotype of ignorance and a lack of savoire faire. Savoire can do Faire (or vice versa) and I could care less. I'm conservative, and I think. If we keep our shit together we can kick some serious ass next election; eh what?
To: StarFan; Dutchy; alisasny; Black Agnes; BobFromNJ; BUNNY2003; Cacique; Clemenza; Coleus; DKNY; ...
ping!
Please FReepmail me if you want on or off my infrequent miscellaneous ping list.
18
posted on
11/30/2003 11:03:05 PM PST
by
nutmeg
(Is the DemocRATic party extinct yet?)
To: dixiechick2000
dixiechick2000 wrote:
I don't know Adam Buckman from a hole in the ground.
Apparently, that's a GOOD thing. Diixie... some people use holes in the ground for latrines...
On second thought, perhaps there is no practical difference.
To: OESY
Adam Buckman forces himself on small animals. I saw it in a movie, so I know he won't be mad that I said that.
Adam Buckman goes to prison on visiting days and sells himself for cigarettes. If you don't have any ccigarettes, he'll give you some. I saw it in a movie, so I know he won't be mad that I said that.
Adam Buckman is the guy who all those emergency room gerbil stories are based on. I saw it in a movie, so I know he won't be mad that I said that.
20
posted on
12/01/2003 1:46:16 AM PST
by
Doctor Raoul
(How can they call it a "Peace March" when they unconditionally support those who kill our soldiers?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-33 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson