Skip to comments.
Rush Calls Bush Like Nixon. Republicans cannot claim to be for small government.
Rush Live broadcast ^
| 11/25/03
| rushy
Posted on 11/25/2003 9:59:43 AM PST by Mark Felton
Rush has spent the last several minutes likening Bush to Nixon. Nixon gave us OSHA and the EPA. Bush is giving us Prescription Medicine benefits for seniors.
Rush says the Republican party cannot claim to be the party of smaller government.
This sounds likme the OLD Rush of 10 years ago!
Go Get Em Rush!
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: chat; dickmorris; movetochat; soccermompolitics; thisischat; triangulation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281 next last
To: JohnGalt
If I read the Constitution correctly I do not see any reference to seniors being entitiled to free drugs at MY expense. And this amount will grow to a TRILLION within a few years. But you all stayed & voted in this "TWO-PARTY CARTEL" & they screwd you Big Time. I have now had it with all of them. Can any of you here actually favor what happened?? If so, you aren't conservative. If you are a conservative why would you support this man next election. Your response probably is , look at the alternative. And that's my point - the Cartel has ingrained into you that these two corrupt parties are your only choice.
41
posted on
11/25/2003 10:18:48 AM PST
by
Digger
To: gimmealewinsky
"Forcing the younger generations to pay the tab for something the elderly never paid into is nothing more than big gov't theft" Don't forget borrowing more money to pay the debt already owed, meanwhile, using as collateral the ability to confiscate the fruits of the labor of the citizens.
42
posted on
11/25/2003 10:19:46 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
(democrats are herd animals)
To: Digger
What in heck went wrong with that spell check ??
43
posted on
11/25/2003 10:20:10 AM PST
by
Digger
To: tomakaze
Excellent point.
44
posted on
11/25/2003 10:20:42 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("How few were left who had seen the Republic!"-Tacitus)
To: Dane
"Rush is his old self, politically naive and politcally bombastic"
Hah. You calling someone politically naive is like michael jackson calling someone a freak.
To: Dane
Help me out here, during the Y2K election campaign didn't Bush promise senior citizens some sort of prescription drug benefit?
If so, he's just keeping a campaign promise.
46
posted on
11/25/2003 10:20:53 AM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: Orangedog
Actually the GOP in 1994 and 1995 delivered the sharpest drop in the deficit and the lowest increase in Government spending *EVER*.
Times change!
47
posted on
11/25/2003 10:20:57 AM PST
by
WOSG
(The only thing that will defeat us is defeatism itself)
To: Sam Cree; KDD
A quandary for the Bushbots who are Rushbots Not really, Rush is an entertainer. His first half hour is filled with pro-Pubbie stuff(his bread and butter), his second half hour(where listenership is less) is a bone thrown to the "true beleivers", fall on their sword, don't care if Hillary gets to sign a $800 billion prescription bill with no reforms, the revolution is coming any second, yada, yada, yada, crowd.
48
posted on
11/25/2003 10:21:39 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Mark Felton
Yes indeed. Rush is Right.
49
posted on
11/25/2003 10:22:10 AM PST
by
armadale
To: Mudboy Slim
"I got yer back...MUD"Careful --- someone might contact the website moderator and whiiiiiiiiiiiine to them. ;-)
To: Digger
That is a question to ask Rush, not me, since we all know Rush will support this Administration and Republicans in general by late next year.
51
posted on
11/25/2003 10:23:01 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("How few were left who had seen the Republic!"-Tacitus)
To: quidnunc
The bill that has been pushed through also includes a ton of money to support the border hospitals that are going under due to having to treat the illegal hordes.
Our paychecks are getting raped again and I don't know about yours but there wasn't so much as a kiss or vaseline on mine last week.
To: epluribus_2
theres a stretch. Giving old people, who have paid not a penny into the system, free drugs is for the war? I get where you're going, but that means this is pure and simple vote buying. Clearly transparent and at what point do you draw the line? Why not another 400 bill. to give all 18-24 yr. olds free college tuition? another 400 bill for middle agers to buy that porsche?
WHAT happened to the John Kasick wing of my party?!?!?!?!?
53
posted on
11/25/2003 10:23:40 AM PST
by
gimmealewinsky
(Send the frenchies to show'em how to surrender...)
To: quidnunc
Help me out here, during the Y2K election campaign didn't Bush promise senior citizens some sort of prescription drug benefit? If so, he's just keeping a campaign promise
Yep and Rush has some woman on who would make a rabid dog look like a docile cocker spaniel.
How dare GW keep a campaign promise. Damn him to hell.
54
posted on
11/25/2003 10:24:19 AM PST
by
Dane
To: Mark Felton
Rush is right on the money. Don't expect anyone to argue against what he's said of course but the usual "oh he's just an entertainer" smears.
55
posted on
11/25/2003 10:24:54 AM PST
by
KantianBurke
(Don't Tread on Me)
To: Mudboy Slim
Glad to hear that - thanks for the information.
To: KantianBurke
Rush is right on the money. Don't expect anyone to argue against what he's said of course but the usual "oh he's just an entertainer" smears Uh KB, Rush has said many times that he is an entertainer. Are you his official spokesman, now?
57
posted on
11/25/2003 10:27:51 AM PST
by
Dane
To: quidnunc
God knows keeping a campaign promise is so much more important than following the Constitution. He swore on the Holy Bible to uphold that too. But polls are more important eh?
58
posted on
11/25/2003 10:28:05 AM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: Mark Felton
Rush says the Republican party cannot claim to be the party of smaller government. Rush is right.
And opinions on the spending in Iraq will vary depending on whether or not folks think ousting Saddam was vital to our national defense. I think it was.
59
posted on
11/25/2003 10:28:19 AM PST
by
k2blader
(Haruspex, beware.)
To: Mudboy Slim; Southack
I'm not entirely thrilled with the COST of this bill, but then again, what we GOT in exchange for the price paid was a beachhead on the road to privatization.
Southack has explained that in a lot of detail, and the fact that Kennedy and other left-wingers blasted this bill big time is an indication that this bill is not as bad as some fear. Imperfect, yes. We paid a high price for the beachhead.
But I'd submit that as Medicare and Social Security eventually are privatized, this bill will be seen as the first step.
60
posted on
11/25/2003 10:28:35 AM PST
by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson