Skip to comments.
Rush Calls Bush Like Nixon. Republicans cannot claim to be for small government.
Rush Live broadcast ^
| 11/25/03
| rushy
Posted on 11/25/2003 9:59:43 AM PST by Mark Felton
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 281 next last
To: quidnunc
Flattery will get you everywhere, q.
101
posted on
11/25/2003 11:09:34 AM PST
by
JohnGalt
("How few were left who had seen the Republic!"-Tacitus)
To: Mark Felton
I guess detox did bring the conservative back in Rush.
To: Dane
" Rush throws some red meat to the far right " Who is the far right? Those who oppose ever larger government responsibility for our lives?
103
posted on
11/25/2003 11:11:14 AM PST
by
Sam Cree
(democrats are herd animals)
To: Dane
And show me where Nixon signed a bill with privitaztion reforms for medicare. Nixon didn't, so Rush's contention that Nixon and GW are the same is moot. The next time you try to compare libertarians and Hillary, I'm going to bring this thread up.
104
posted on
11/25/2003 11:11:33 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
To: Mark Felton
To: quidnunc
The wingnut ideologues who are ragging on Dubya are part of the death-before-electability crowd. Who would of thunk it people on free republic quoting and supporting Molly Ivins view of the world. We are closer to hell than I thought.
To: stljoe71
ANY legislation can be revisted in the future. Nothing (except the pressure form we the people) prevents Congress and the President from repealing or changing laws made in a previous Congress.
The Democrats running for President sure seem to think that the two Bush tax cuts can be revisted. If that is the case, then the same goes for this legislation as well.
If conservatives let ideological purity blind them to the need to generate results (and to win elections), then we might as well get ready to say "President Dean".
107
posted on
11/25/2003 11:14:49 AM PST
by
hchutch
("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
To: hchutch
And if the left wing beachhead grows under bush what good is winning an election?
You seem to be satisfied that it grow at a modestly slower pace under a republican. Of course even that is in question as GW has made clinton look like a fiscal conservative when it comes to spending.
To: BibChr
You got it. It's about governing for the majority of Americans. FDR, Kennedy, and Reagan understood this. So does Bush.
The Republicans are a majority party, and far more likely to defend my key issues; safe streets, punishment of criminals, anti-pc, gun ownership, freedom of worship, lower taxes, and less social experimentation and dependence on looney pressure groups.
Anything else is gravy.
109
posted on
11/25/2003 11:16:59 AM PST
by
Luke21
To: jmc813
The next time you try to compare libertarians and Hillary, I'm going to bring this thread up Go right ahead, Nixon didn't get a dime from Libertarian sugar daddy or Hillary friend, George Soros.
110
posted on
11/25/2003 11:18:14 AM PST
by
Dane
To: gimmealewinsky
"This things going to cost Trillions..."
Why do you feel the need to exaggerate?
This bill costs $39.5 Billion per year for the next ten years (at which time Medicare is substantially privatized). That's $10 (yes, ten Dollars) per month per American.
In exchange for that $10, we get preventative medicine (Medicare currently pays only for reactive care such as surgery rather than pro-active care such as doctor checkups and medicine) and a path to Privatize the beast of Medicare.
Tossing around wildly exaggerated terms such as "Trillions" prevents honest debate of what we're paying for what we're getting, however, and can run the risk of making people focus on their emotions rather than upon cold facts.
Why would you want to do that?
111
posted on
11/25/2003 11:18:31 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Sam Cree
"Who is the far right? Those who oppose ever larger government responsibility for our lives?" Count me in...MUD
112
posted on
11/25/2003 11:19:53 AM PST
by
Mudboy Slim
(RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
To: quidnunc
"Sooner or later a prescription-drug benefit was absolutely inevitable."Agree. How many election years has Medicare reform been promised in order to get the votes of seniors and then never delivered?
IMO it's too big and the language is too vague in spots because the language hasn't been ironed out and I keep wondering just what deals were cut to get the votes of the likes of Judas Jeffords. It needs serious trimming, and if ever there was an excuse to viciously ax unecessary programs and cut government employees, this bill is it.
On the other hand, I'm not entirely against it. There's a $3,600 deductible before the prescription even kicks in, and it does make provision for partial privatization. Privatization is what's needed. Social Security privatization too. The fact that Teddy Kennedy and Tommy Daschle were railing against it it another point in it's favor.
113
posted on
11/25/2003 11:20:12 AM PST
by
cake_crumb
(UN Resolutions = Very Expensive, Very SCRATCHY Toilet Paper)
To: Dane
Now you're pointing out the flaws in your own logic.
114
posted on
11/25/2003 11:20:22 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
To: stljoe71
stljoe71 wrote:
(The wingnut ideologues who are ragging on Dubya are part of the death-before-electability crowd.) Who would of thunk it people on free republic quoting and supporting Molly Ivins view of the world. We are closer to hell than I thought.Like Iraq, there are a lot of of dead-enders lurking about among the denizens of Free Republic.
In Iraq the dead-enders are Baathists and jihadist crazies, on Free Republic they're creatures from the black lagoon of the paleoconservative fever swamp.
115
posted on
11/25/2003 11:20:29 AM PST
by
quidnunc
(Omnis Gaul delenda est)
To: quidnunc
Sooner or later a prescription-drug benefit was absolutely inevitable. Better for you yourself rather than the other guy to get the credit, and better for to have control over the final product.
The wingnut ideologues who are ragging on Dubya are part of the death-before-electability crowd.
Very true, and you can tell who they are. They are the ones who cut off their nose to spite their face.
116
posted on
11/25/2003 11:21:02 AM PST
by
Dane
To: quidnunc
Rush finally got his thinking right.
To: stljoe71
![](http://bulldogbulletin.lhhosting.com/images/USA-09.gif)
Is it what you spend that bothers you, or what you get for that spending that matters?
118
posted on
11/25/2003 11:22:49 AM PST
by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Mark Felton
Rush says the Republican party cannot claim to be the party of smaller government.
Better late than never I guess
Callers been on him since 94 to get on the GOP but he kept saying WAIT until we have the congress and Presidency
He was part of the problem
119
posted on
11/25/2003 11:24:45 AM PST
by
uncbob
To: Southack
This bill costs $39.5 Billion per year for the next ten yearsGovernment estimates are notorious for never being accurate. As Rep. Ron Paul points out...
The financial impact of this legislation on taxpayers cannot be overstated. Government projections that the drug program will cost $400 billion over the next decade cannot be trusted, as existing Medicare programs cost 4 times more than estimated when they were created. The likely cost is at least $1 trillion over 10 years, and much more in following decades as the American population grows older.
120
posted on
11/25/2003 11:26:04 AM PST
by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 281 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson