Skip to comments.
I know Bush. He's your best chance for peace
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^
| 11/23/03
| David Frum
Posted on 11/22/2003 4:16:38 PM PST by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
1
posted on
11/22/2003 4:16:38 PM PST
by
Pokey78
To: Pokey78
You can also do it by barring Middle Eastern people from your territories and keeping careful watch over those who have already entered. You can do it by supporting regimes willing to crack down on terrorist organisations by any means necessary. You can do it by cutting back on your presence in the region, reducing investment and trade, striking from a distance whenever any state or group seems close to acquiring weapons of mass destruction - but otherwise consigning the people of the region to stagnate in their own rage Plan B.- Blow the hell out of them.
I prefer plan B.
2
posted on
11/22/2003 4:23:57 PM PST
by
Holly_P
To: Pokey78
As usual David Frum is right on. I believe that if we fail in Iraq, nuclear bombs will be detonating in the Middle East within 10 years.
3
posted on
11/22/2003 4:26:42 PM PST
by
Maynerd
To: Pokey78
...to fortify your society against Middle Eastern terror... bar Middle Eastern people from your territories and keep careful watch over those who have already entered. This would be simple, effective, and would save tens of billions. So there is no way.
4
posted on
11/22/2003 4:33:42 PM PST
by
Plutarch
To: Maynerd
Not to mention the Mid West...
Maybe Omaha or Indianiapolis
5
posted on
11/22/2003 4:35:40 PM PST
by
76834
To: 76834
Not to mention the Mid West... Maybe Omaha or Indianiapolis It goes without saying, if a US city is nuked buh bye Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Pakastani nukes,. . . fill in the blank.
6
posted on
11/22/2003 4:39:42 PM PST
by
Maynerd
To: Pokey78
Fortunately, it now seems overwhelmingly probable that the US will succeed in Iraq and that Bush will be re-elected; that the Iraqis will gain their freedom and the Palestinians will get their state. And if and when these things do happen, Europeans and Britons will have to accept that George W Bush is not some weird American fad - that he represents something big and important about the United States. I not only hope so too, I think so too. But if and when these things do happen, Europeans will be falling over themselves claiming credit for them.
To: Maynerd
It goes without saying, if a US city is nuked buh bye Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Pakastani nukes,. . . fill in the blankWon't we need UN approval to do that?
8
posted on
11/22/2003 4:46:50 PM PST
by
GWB00
To: GWB00
>>It goes without saying, if a US city is nuked buh bye Saudi Arabia, Iran, Syria, Pakastani nukes,. . . fill in the blank>>
Not IF, but WHEN.
To: GWB00
If that happens it figures that New Yawk along with the UN will be radioactive ashes.
10
posted on
11/22/2003 4:52:02 PM PST
by
76834
To: GWB00
Won't we need UN approval to do that? LOL. Won't they be on the target list as well?
11
posted on
11/22/2003 4:53:48 PM PST
by
Maynerd
To: Pokey78
Forget about peace. Bush is our best hope for victory over the IslamiNazis and their Leftist comrades. A Demonrat president will try to make peace, just as Neville Chamberlain and fools like him tried to make peace with Hitler.
12
posted on
11/22/2003 4:55:35 PM PST
by
Free ThinkerNY
(((Live Free or Die!!)))
To: Maynerd
LOL
Read #10
13
posted on
11/22/2003 4:56:04 PM PST
by
76834
To: Maynerd
"As usual David Frum is right on. I believe that if we fail in Iraq, nuclear bombs will be detonating in the Middle East within 10 years"I believe this will happen, if we fail or ,if we succeed.
The Word of God says, it is so.
God, is Jesus Christ, not Muhaamad.
14
posted on
11/22/2003 5:02:28 PM PST
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: auggy
In the meantime, while the whole damm world is about to go up in flames, FOX nooze has gone into their new "Michael Trance" not to be confused with their nightly "Scott/Lacy/Kobe Trance"
Enuf to make you puke.....
15
posted on
11/22/2003 5:09:08 PM PST
by
76834
To: GWB00
Won't we need UN approval to do that? I think you forgot /sarcasm, otherwise F*CK the UN!
It is because of their pussyfooting around we're in this mess with these terrorrists.
16
posted on
11/22/2003 5:30:59 PM PST
by
quesera
(Scr*w the RATS, the U.N., and the French!)
To: 76834
Just read on Drudge, that the 12 year old victim has ,"love letters", from Michael. Enough, to indict him with.
Wonder, how long Michael will last in prison?
17
posted on
11/22/2003 5:31:26 PM PST
by
auggy
(http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-DownhomeKY /// Check out My USA Photo album & Fat Files)
To: auggy
Probly not too long.
I can imagine some big biker thats been in the can for 30 years, spending all his time lifting weights, saying to Michael, "Come here sweetie and gimme a little kiss"
ROL
18
posted on
11/22/2003 5:35:55 PM PST
by
76834
To: auggy
If he goes to prison, he'll have to change his name to Ben Dover.
19
posted on
11/22/2003 5:38:54 PM PST
by
Free ThinkerNY
(((Live Free or Die!!)))
To: GWB00
Won't we need UN approval to do that?It would be political suicide for a US president to not immediately deliver a nuclear retaiatory strike. In a worst-case scenario, failure to retaliate might trigger a popular revolt in the US.
20
posted on
11/22/2003 5:42:22 PM PST
by
FierceDraka
("I AM NOT A NUMBER - I AM A FREE MAN!")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-43 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson