Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

TIMECNN POLL: Most Registered Voters Would Choose Bush
CNN ^ | Fri Nov 21 2003 | CNN/TIME

Posted on 11/22/2003 2:06:42 AM PST by ruffisthudpucker

TIMECNN POLL: Most Registered Voters Would Choose Bush Fri Nov 21 2003 19:44:24 ET

New York – If the 2004 Presidential election was held today, registered voters surveyed for TIME/CNN would choose President George W. Bush over any of the declared Democratic candidates.

In a direct run against Bush, Gen. Wesley Clark fares the best among registered voters (Clark 42%, Bush 49%), closely followed by Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry (Kerry 41%, Bush 49%).

Bush would beat any of three other Democrats, 52 percent to 39 percent, in a direct match: Missouri Rep. Dick Gephardt, Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman, or Vermont Gov. Howard Dean. Against Bush, North Carolina Sen. John Edwards would lose, 38 percent to 52 percent.

When registered Democrats are asked which Democratic presidential nominee they would vote for, Dean edges out Clark 14 percent to 12 percent, followed Lieberman (11%), Kerry (9%), Gephardt (6%), then Edwards and the Rev. Al Sharpton (5%).

The TIME/CNN Poll, conducted November 18-19, 2003 by HarrisInteractive, surveyed 1,330 registered voters by telephone. The margin of error is +/-2.7% points for registered voters, and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters surveyed for TIME/CNN.

Developing...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; bush; bushpoll; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

1 posted on 11/22/2003 2:06:43 AM PST by ruffisthudpucker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
Developing...


A LANDSLIDE!!!
2 posted on 11/22/2003 2:16:26 AM PST by tkathy (The islamofascists and the democrats are trying to destroy this country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
This shows that they know nothing about Clark,AKA Dr Strangelove or he wouldn't do so well..
3 posted on 11/22/2003 2:30:39 AM PST by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
Newsflash: Most likely US voters have a brain.

The DemonCrap candidates want to hand US soverignty to the UN and then hire the French to open a surrender school.
4 posted on 11/22/2003 2:49:01 AM PST by clee1 (Where's the beef???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
Somewhere, somebody is deeply saddened.
5 posted on 11/22/2003 3:35:05 AM PST by tbpiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbpiper
Yep, and no one is more deeply saddened than the fair and balanced folks at Time/CNN. < /sarcasm>
6 posted on 11/22/2003 3:37:05 AM PST by demkicker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
...The margin of error is +/-2.7% points for registered voters, and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters...

Looks like democrat voters are still being disenfranchised or the pollsters used punch-card ballots...

7 posted on 11/22/2003 4:02:00 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
But...but..every night Chris Matthews says he is going to lose.
8 posted on 11/22/2003 4:20:48 AM PST by CaptainK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
BWAHAHAHAHAH!

The nuts will start rethinking Dean after these polls keeep showing Dean losing bigger than the others.
9 posted on 11/22/2003 5:21:02 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
I don't think Dean can be stopped. And I like it! :)
10 posted on 11/22/2003 5:44:55 AM PST by veronica ("I just realised I have a perfect part for you in "Terminator 4"....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
Democrats don't rely on registered voters to win elections. It is a meaningless poll as far as the Democrats are concerned.
11 posted on 11/22/2003 7:14:06 AM PST by been_lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I have to ask - is Bush really that great a president??? I will concede that he is much better than Gore or the currant group of Dem contenders, but.....

1) If non-discretionary spending remained flat, our country will be in a world of hurt by 2015 without a major overhaul of our entitlement programs.

2) Non-discretionary spending for the last 2 years has gone up 27%!!!!!! The majority of this increase has nothing to do with national security.

3) Another HUGE entitlement program is about to go into law.

4) No conservative/constitutionalist judges have been able to get confirmed (this is the real key to the little guy keeping gov't of their back).

From my perspective, who needs democrats with the current crowd running things.

Flame away.

12 posted on 11/22/2003 7:29:24 AM PST by al_again
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tkathy
I wonder what happens when they poll likely voters?
13 posted on 11/22/2003 7:42:02 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Dr. Strangelove, funny you mention that. I was just thinking about Clark the other day when he blew up and how he reminded me of the General in that movie that took over the base. (played by Sterling Hayden) LOL
14 posted on 11/22/2003 7:54:29 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
Wait until the moderates find out how insane Clark is and who really controls him:


15 posted on 11/22/2003 8:14:42 AM PST by Grampa Dave (Sore@US, the Evil Daddy Warbucks, has owned the DemonicRats for decades!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker
so we don't need a damn 1 trillion dollar drug give-away bill!
16 posted on 11/22/2003 8:16:47 AM PST by petercooper (Proud VRWC Neanderthal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
+/-2.7% points for registered voters, and +/-4.7% for Democratic voters...

Different sample sizes. As a rule of thumb, the "margin of error" is reported as 98% divided by the square root of the sample size, implying (accurate in the first two places) that the sample was 1300 voters, 430 of whom were Democrats.

17 posted on 11/22/2003 8:33:59 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Uday and Qusay and Idi-ay are ead-day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ruffisthudpucker

18 posted on 11/22/2003 8:36:22 AM PST by ChadGore (Kakkate Koi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
I've often wondered why most statisticians lack a sense of humor. ;-)
19 posted on 11/22/2003 8:43:20 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer
Looks like democrat voters are still being disenfranchised or the pollsters used punch-card ballots

Pregnant chads will do it every time!

However, MOE is a function of sample size, and the dumRat sample is a subset of the overall sample. So this is expected.

20 posted on 11/22/2003 9:19:38 AM PST by Ole Okie (Go Sooners!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-30 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson