Het, even Slate noticed. But, will anyone notice Slate noticed unless it's posted somewhere where people will notice it.
1 posted on
11/19/2003 6:17:47 AM PST by
Gothmog
To: Gothmog
IF it had been a memo that pointed a guilty finger at President Bush it would be all over all the main network TV channels, CNN, and all the front pages of all the newspapers.....
2 posted on
11/19/2003 6:20:28 AM PST by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary? Me Neither!!!!)
To: Gothmog
Bookmarked.
To: Gothmog
"Why?"
Is that a rhetorical question?
;)
4 posted on
11/19/2003 6:21:18 AM PST by
bannie
(The government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend upon the support of Paul.)
To: Gothmog
Case Open: Why is the press avoiding the Weekly Standard's intelligence scoop?The press is dominated by democrats and other sworn enemies of the United States.
5 posted on
11/19/2003 6:24:06 AM PST by
friendly
(Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
To: Gothmog
My God, Shafer wrote something that I actually agree with, and something that didn't proclaim George Bush as the anti-Christ. I'll be looking out my window all day for flying pigs.
}:-)4
6 posted on
11/19/2003 6:29:03 AM PST by
Moose4
("The road goes on forever, and the party never ends." --Robert Earl Keen)
To: Gothmog
Seriously, we should all contact this guy and give him congradulations for pointing out the obvious.
To: Gothmog
"If a Slate fell in the Internet would anybody hear it?"
To: Gothmog
media bias. why else.
10 posted on
11/19/2003 6:41:26 AM PST by
petercooper
(Proud VRWC Neanderthal)
To: Gothmog
I beleived long before the war with Iraq that President Bush had confirmed this link between Bin Laden's terrorists and Iraq, but couldn't reveal it to protect US intelligence sources.
President Bush is a man of integrety who would not have commited US forces to a war in Iraq simply to show his macho as is insinuated by the liberals. On the contrary, Clinton bombed an aspirin factory in the Sudan to take pressure off his Monica affair and likely killed some innocent people in the process.
To: Gothmog
14 posted on
11/19/2003 6:45:51 AM PST by
Gothmog
To: Gothmog
Many a reporter has hitched a ride onto Page One with the leak of intelligence much rawer than the stuff in Feith's memo.Some more reporters should have been mentioning the memo, if only to question its legitimacy.
They didn't even do that...which makes it clear that their bosses don't want the memo to get air time or media space.
I'm sure that, somewhere, some liberal media honcho is trying to find something connected with the memo that can blame Bush big-time.
If the honcho or an underling succeeds in pointing a finger at Bush, we will hear about the memo.
16 posted on
11/19/2003 6:49:58 AM PST by
syriacus
(In this world there's matter, antimatter, and ANTIFACT. Schumer is an expert on antifacts.)
To: Gothmog
bookmark
19 posted on
11/19/2003 7:00:39 AM PST by
CheezyD
To: Gothmog
The press experienced such a tabby moment this week following the publication of Stephen F. Hayes' cover story in the most recent Weekly Standard about alleged links between Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden. The press has already said that Bush lied about that. End of story. So I guess that means there is no connection! /sarcasm
23 posted on
11/19/2003 7:29:51 AM PST by
Terriergal
(Psalm 11: 3 "When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?")
To: Gothmog
INTREP - LIBERAL, ARROGANT MEDIA ALERT!
To: Gothmog
btttt
32 posted on
11/19/2003 11:01:13 AM PST by
ellery
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson