Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. Supreme Court Rules - Gay Couples have the Right to Marry
FoxNews | 11-18-03 | FoxNews

Posted on 11/18/2003 7:02:44 AM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Mass. Supreme Court rules that illegal for state to deny marriage license to gay couples.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: activistjudges; aids; antifamily; gay; godsjudgement; goodridge; hiv; homos; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; judicalactivism; justdamn; legislatingsin; oligarchy; pederasty; perversion; perverts; prisoners; protectmarriage; queers; reprobates; romans1; samesexmarriage; sodomites; sodomy; tyrannyofthefew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 561-565 next last
To: MineralMan
Someone was telling me last night that Christians weren't allowed to marry at all until about 900 AD, when some Pope decided that the only way he could fight Crusades was to have his followers making babies.

I haven't found a good link on it, but I thought it was interesting, and something I didn't know before.
401 posted on 11/18/2003 9:49:44 AM PST by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 369 | View Replies]

To: HamiltonJay
THe only reason the state has any interest in heterosexual marriage is because offspring can be produced through normal and natural activity.. this is not the case with homosexual relationships so there is absolutely no reason for the state to sanction or care about these individual relationships

So why should states sanction any heterosexual marriage involving a couple who demonstrably cannot reproduce, such as one in which the woman is post-menopausal or the man infertile?

402 posted on 11/18/2003 9:51:10 AM PST by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
who are they Mass. Supreme Court names please
403 posted on 11/18/2003 9:51:41 AM PST by freetradenotfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freetradenotfree
See post #336
404 posted on 11/18/2003 9:53:22 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: freetradenotfree
I suggest we focus our attention on the Federal Marriage Amendment. This will take the issue of marriage OUT of the courts hands.

Amending the Constitution is a valid tool to correct the actions of the courts. This is no longer a state issue, this is now a federal issue. See above link for members of Amendment subcommittee. at http://www.house.gov
405 posted on 11/18/2003 9:54:04 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 403 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
don't think that is correct.
406 posted on 11/18/2003 9:54:49 AM PST by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: Quick1
Someone was telling me last night that Christians weren't allowed to marry at all until about 900 AD...

Were you at a bar?

407 posted on 11/18/2003 9:55:12 AM PST by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 401 | View Replies]

To: freetradenotfree
He cited an incident in which Ms. Marshall, while at Harvard, chastised a professor who had used university stationery for a personal note with an anti-abortion message.

The professor referred to, IIRC, was Mary Anne Glendon (writes for and is, I think, on the editorial board of First Things).

408 posted on 11/18/2003 10:07:06 AM PST by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 400 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Statistically, Homosexual couples have the highest rates of domestic violence in the household.

But doesn't 100% of all domestic violence occur in the household? Because otherwise, it wouldn't be domestic.

409 posted on 11/18/2003 10:09:34 AM PST by Koblenz (There's usually a free market solution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Good news! The politicians will not have to take a stand on marriage and the family. The Bay State Supremes are singing O Canada!
410 posted on 11/18/2003 10:13:26 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
"I now pronounce you, man and horse..."
411 posted on 11/18/2003 10:15:22 AM PST by Rutles4Ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 410 | View Replies]

To: cajungirl
This MA Supreme Court decision allows domestic partnerships a la Vermont. Even liberals know going Canada all the way now would backfire on them big time.
412 posted on 11/18/2003 10:16:21 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
I see your point, but men and women are going to get married, live together, and raise children together whether the government recognizes it or not. I don't think gay marriage trivializes the institution of marriage, but I think divorce does.

A lot of people in general and especially on FR get SO worked up over gay 'marriage', and I honestly can't see why, when I think divorce and single parent (or no parent) families are a much bigger problem.

413 posted on 11/18/2003 10:17:58 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 282 | View Replies]

To: AmericanMade1776
I left Mass. in 1976.....never looked back. Good luck wherever you are going, it can only get better:)
IA
414 posted on 11/18/2003 10:19:07 AM PST by international american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
I see your point, but men and women are going to get married, live together, and raise children together whether the government recognizes it or not. I don't think gay marriage trivializes the institution of marriage, but I think divorce does.

Amen.

415 posted on 11/18/2003 10:22:12 AM PST by Celtjew Libertarian (Shake Hands with the Serpent: Poetry by Charles Lipsig aka Celtjew http://books.lulu.com/lipsig)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 413 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
Marriage shouldn't be a legal term at all.. The state shouldn't be in the business of deciding who is married and who isn't. And it shouldn't offer benefits or penalties to married couples.
416 posted on 11/18/2003 10:22:56 AM PST by fiscally_right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

417 posted on 11/18/2003 10:24:47 AM PST by RckyRaCoCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Yeah, I've been looking and I've found absolutely nothing on that. I think I'll call him a dumbass when I see him today. ;)

I did find out that having multiple wives and mistresses was quite a common practice in the early Catholic church, however. Interesting.
418 posted on 11/18/2003 10:29:55 AM PST by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 406 | View Replies]

To: CatoRenasci
I think you are right that many gays were confused about their sexualtiy at an early age, and I think that many were sexually abused by older men and women. I don't think that is recruiting, though, I think it is sexual abuse.
419 posted on 11/18/2003 10:30:04 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Also in their ruling: Up is down, less is more!
420 posted on 11/18/2003 10:30:16 AM PST by FormerLib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 381-400401-420421-440 ... 561-565 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson