[pogo101]

THe only reason the state has any interest in heterosexual marriage is because offspring can be produced through normal and natural activity.. this is not the case with homosexual relationships so there is absolutely no reason for the state to sanction or care about these individual relationships

So why should states sanction any heterosexual marriage involving a couple who demonstrably cannot reproduce, such as one in which the woman is post-menopausal or the man infertile?

[HamiltonJay]

You know darn well policy is not written along the fringes, but the whole. THere is no reason at all for the government to be sanctioning any sort of relationship between same sex couples... no more than there should be to opposite sex couples living together without civil union.

You think policy should be all couples must be tested fully for fertility before government recognizes their marriage? Be real... you are stretching beyond stretching...


THe queers and dykes have been screaming for years stay out of their bedrooms, now they want the government to not only go in there, but sanction their relationships... its hypocritical its nonsense and its meaningless.

Gays and dykes want to live together, go for it, who cares? But there certainly is no government or public policy need for the governments to sanction or be involved in it.