Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Limbaugh Returns to Talk Radio, and Topic No. 1 Is Himself
NY Times ^ | 11/17/03 | Jaques Steinberg

Posted on 11/17/2003 3:49:03 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

merging from a self-imposed exile in which he was treated for an addiction to painkillers, Rush Limbaugh returned to the air today. And listeners who tuned in during the first few minutes of his radio show would have been forgiven if they thought they were hearing an Oprah-style self-help session.

"I have to admit that I am powerless over this addiction that I have," Mr. Limbaugh, speaking from a Manhattan studio, told his listeners, just after noon on the East Coast. "I used to think I could beat it with force of will."

During a 16-minute opening monologue, Mr. Limbaugh, who has spoken in the past about the need to jail more drug abusers, instead borrowed liberally from the teachings of 12-step programs like Alcoholics Anonymous.

Asking and then answering a question about what he had learned during a month inside a treatment center in Arizona, Mr. Limbaugh said, "You can boil it down to one real simple essence: I can't be responsible for anybody's happiness but my own."

He added, "I have thought that I had to be this way or that way in order to be liked or appreciated or understood, and in the process I denied myself who I was."

Mr. Limbaugh acknowledged that "a lot of people" had branded him a hypocrite for urging tough punishment for some drug users while not being forthcoming about his own addiction, which, he said today, dates to the mid-1990's. He has said that he became addicted to painkillers after spinal surgery in the 1990's.

"My behavior doesn't change right or wrong," he said. He acknowledged, however, that for nearly a decade he "avoided the subject of drugs on this program for the precise reason I was keeping a secret." At times, he said, he even pretended that he did not recognize the names of painkillers mentioned by callers.

One of the first calls he took today, from a woman identified only as Mary Jo of Montgomery, Ala., was about a friend in trouble.

"You have a friend who's an addict?" Mr. Limbaugh asked. The caller responded that she did, and wanted to know "what strengthens someone?"

"Are you ready to listen?" Mr. Limbaugh asked. "I want you to know something now. You are not responsible for what your friend does."

Though the early segments of his three-hour show were devoted to what Mr. Limbaugh had learned about himself in treatment, he still took time to practice his stock in trade, advancing the message of the right and lambasting the left. He took swipes at familiar liberal targets like Senators Edward M. Kennedy and Hillary Rodham Clinton.

And he took pains to assure his listeners that he had not been brainwashed while in treatment, during which, he acknowledged, he rarely read a newspaper and watched little on television other than football.

"Many people feel and think that when you go to a rehabilitation center for addictions or other things, that the people in there turn you into a linguini-spined liberal, and that's not true," he said.

Rather, he said, he tried to incorporate what he had learned about himself and use it to psychoanalyze his opponents. Among the problems with liberals, Mr. Limbaugh said he had discovered, is that "they don't like themselves."

"You ever see liberals smile about anything?" he asked.

Mr. Limbaugh said there was only one subject he would not talk about on the air: news reports suggesting that he had acquired drugs like the painkiller OxyContin without a prescription and that the matter was now the subject of an investigation.

"This is something I am not able to be as blunt and open about now as I'd like to be," he said. "That day will come, and it will come soon."

There was much riding on Mr. Limbaugh's return, which was broadcast over the 600 radio stations that carry his syndicated show. Though in a typical week he draws at least 14.5 million listeners — nearly 20 million by his estimate — industry analysts suggested that he might draw four to five times as many today. His actual ratings, as compiled by Arbitron, will not be known for several weeks.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: mediabias; nytimes; pilingon; rush; rushlimbaugh; rushreturns; talkradio; welcomeback
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/17/2003 3:49:04 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Mr. Limbaugh, who has spoken in the past about the need to jail more drug abusers,

DATE, please, NYT ... (AND I'll pull the audio if it's in the last 5 years)

2 posted on 11/17/2003 3:51:20 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Rush speaks on gutless 'Liberalism' (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Though in a typical week he draws at least 14.5 million listeners — nearly 20 million by his estimate...
Umm. I don't think there's any debate. It's twenety million.
3 posted on 11/17/2003 3:57:06 PM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Using Occam's Razor to shave the hairy armpits of liberal feminists....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Attacks on "familar targets" like Ted Kennedy. Yes. This was also a part of Rush's opening monologue.

The media was also a part of that attack on Ted. Rush was pointing out the double standard at how Ted Kennedy can call minorities "neanderthals" and not be asked to resign; "Good thing he doesn't work at ESPN".

I was glad that Rush saw fit to include such a comparison before the first commercial break when he had the ears of this nation (friend and foe) tuned in.

4 posted on 11/17/2003 3:57:28 PM PST by weegee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: _Jim
DATE, please, NYT ... (AND I'll pull the audio if it's in the last 5 years)

Every quote I have seen was in 1995.

5 posted on 11/17/2003 3:59:49 PM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Love the title. And if he ignored the past month without talking about it, they would have said, "Rush pretends like nothing happened."
6 posted on 11/17/2003 4:00:55 PM PST by stands2reason (What you see at fight club is a generation of men raised by women. ~Chuck Palahniuk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection; RonDog
...advancing the message of the right and lambasting the left.

Nothing wrong with that...

7 posted on 11/17/2003 4:05:09 PM PST by Libloather (That thing got a hemi? Sweet...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
Every quote I have seen was in 1995.

Means nothing, absolutely NOTHING.

8 posted on 11/17/2003 4:07:02 PM PST by _Jim ( <--- Rush speaks on gutless 'Liberalism' (RealAudio files))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"industry analysts suggested that he might draw four to five times as many today."

I sure hope so!

This is a pathetic article. Come on, what was he supposed to do, come back and talk politics like nothing had happened? As he said, it's almost like a family, the community that he has created. Yes, we want to know how it went, if he's okay, etc.

Good grief. Are there no depths to which they will not stoop?

Oh, never mind... ;)
9 posted on 11/17/2003 4:09:10 PM PST by proud American in Canada ("We are a peaceful people. Yet we are not a fragile people.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
*** I can't be responsible for anybody's happiness but my own." ***

Yes, Rush did say that, and I admit that I was surprised by his statement, but he then went on to explain it. He said that he learned that nobody else is responsible for his happiness but himself. But of course the NY Times had to put the meaning in the wrong place.

As for his opening monologue, doesn't the Times know that his listeners wanted to hear that, and to hear it up front? Those first sixteen minutes were fantastic. And the show, and Rush, got even better as he picked up speed and seemed to be totally comfortable at the mike once again.

Thank God Rush is BACK!
10 posted on 11/17/2003 4:16:13 PM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
What we have here is a man with his ears pinned back. Did anyone here his last statment on his show today?
11 posted on 11/17/2003 4:26:31 PM PST by sparkplug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sparkplug
***What we have here is a man with his ears pinned back. Did anyone here his last statment on his show today?***

Yes, and I paraphrase. It was, "I love you people. You'll never know how much I missed you."
12 posted on 11/17/2003 4:35:11 PM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"You ever see liberals smile about anything?" he asked.

"Mandrake, have you ever seen a commie drink a glass of water?"

13 posted on 11/17/2003 5:03:28 PM PST by coulson3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This buttplug is big on direct quotes made by Rush today. I wonder why he didn't treat his readers to the quotes about those familar liberal targets, Ted Kennedy and Hillary Clinton. That would have helped balance out the point this NYT pusspocket attempted to present.
14 posted on 11/17/2003 5:23:40 PM PST by whereasandsoforth (tagged for migratory purposes only)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
One thing I couldn't understand was Rush talking about how he can tell people not to speed on the highway, but if he does so and gets caught it doesn't weaken the message. He was trying to swing that into meaning he wasn't hypocritical with his stance of "leading a moral life" but I couldn't follow him.
15 posted on 11/17/2003 6:33:35 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
but I couldn't follow him.

Hmmmmmmmm.

16 posted on 11/17/2003 8:13:28 PM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Well what do you think he was trying to say?
17 posted on 11/17/2003 8:16:50 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Proof that he is back. "heeeeeeeeereeeee'ssssssss RuuuuuuSHHHHHHHH!!!!"

The party's over!
18 posted on 11/17/2003 8:21:12 PM PST by Freemeorkillme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Imagine the uproar if Rush HADN'T addressed his problem. The lefties would be all over him like you know what on you know what.

I don't even like this NYT's columnist's name...Jaques. Maybe I could handle Jacques, but "Jaques"?

I'd bet if I called him "Jack", he'd hit me with a soggy frog legs quiche.

La dee da!

Leni

19 posted on 11/17/2003 8:26:49 PM PST by MinuteGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinuteGal
Imagine the uproar if Rush HADN'T addressed his problem.

Know what's interesting, he didn't mention the "so-called some-may-call-it-a-fillibuster on last wedsday" or "Rockerfellers' Meno"..hopefully, he will in the next 2/3 days :/

20 posted on 11/17/2003 8:45:40 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson