Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Six Days? (Six Days of Creation, Literal Days or Era's.
Koinonia House ^ | 11/15/2003 | Dr. Chuck Missler

Posted on 11/15/2003 10:50:03 PM PST by bondserv

Part One of a Series:
Why Six Days?
by Chuck Missler

The Book of Genesis presents a disturbing problem for many Bible-believing Christians. Did God really create the heaven and the earth in just six 24-hour days? How does a serious student of the Torah - the five books of Moses - reconcile the Genesis account with the "billions of years" encountered in the dictums of astronomy, geology, et al?

Many continue to attempt to circumvent the problem by assuming that the six days represent "geological eras," or that the traditional text is simply a rhetorical "framework" for a literary summary of the creative process. Various forms of "theistic evolution" have been contrived in attempts to reconcile the Biblical text with the various theories and conjectures which dominate our evolution-based society.

However, the sincere student cannot escape the confrontations which result from the straightforward reading of the text with the ostensible declarations of "science." How can we deal with these fundamental issues?

Why Is It So Critical?

There are four basic questions that confront all of us: Who am I? Where did I come from? Why am I here? Where am I going when I die?

And your eternal destiny will be determined by your "world view" in addressing these issues. And there are really only two world-views: either everything - including you - is the result of some kind of cosmic accident, or this is all the result of a deliberate design by a Designer.

This issue could not be more fundamental to everything. It comes as a shock to many to discover that every major theme and doctrine in the Bible has its roots in this "Book of Beginnings": sovereign election; salvation, justification by faith, believer's security, separation, disciplinary chastisement, the Divine Incarnation, the "rapture" of the church, death and resurrection, the priesthoods (both Aaronic and Melchizedekian), the Antichrist, and even the Palestinian Covenant that is being challenged by the continuing tensions throughout the world today all have their roots in this critical foundational book of the Bible. And each of these issues also has its consummation in the Book of (the) Revelation. (Like every good textbook, the answers are always in the back!)

Who Really Wrote the Torah?

There are those who have suggested the books of Moses were actually compilations by a number of redactors over the years - the common "Documentary Hypothesis" being one of the most prevalent theories. Fortunately, these previously popular notions have been thoroughly shredded by competent scholarship. But allow me to save you many hours of boring library research. I know who wrote the Books of Moses: Moses did. How do I know? Jesus Christ Himself said so! Many times.1

Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? - John 5:45-47

Jesus quotes from each of the books of the Torah and attributes them each to Moses. The New Testament includes 165 direct quotes (and over 200 allusions) to the Book of Genesis, and over 100 of these are from the first 11 chapters. These include the Creator and the creation, 2 (and allusions3), creation of man and woman,4 the fall of man,5 the Flood of Noah,6 etc. So if you believe in Jesus Christ, you have no problem as to who wrote the Book of Genesis. (And if you don't believe in Jesus Christ, you have much bigger problems than the authorship of Genesis!)

But "Six Days"?

The account of the creation of the universe in six days still is a "bone in the throat" to many Christians. Many point out that the word for "day" is yom

, and is translated to 54 other words; however, 1181 of 1480 occurrences it is "day," and when used with a number it is always a literal day. But the real problem isn't the account in Genesis. It is in Exodus. In the middle of the Ten Commandments, the Creator Himself wrote it with His own finger in stone!

For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day, and hallowed it. - Exodus 20:11

It is undeniable that God intended us to understand that it was, indeed, six literal days. So how do we deal with the common understanding that "billions of years" was involved? How do we deal with the astronomical distances of millions of "light years" between the galaxies of the universe? Can anyone familiar with the discoveries of modern science take the Genesis account seriously?

It may come as a pleasant surprise to discover that the more you know about modern science - the real physics, not the mythology and conjectures that masquerade as "science" - the more you can take the Biblical text seriously. The Lord always rewards the diligent. (A recent book includes articles by fifty top scientists - from many different fields of specialization - who declare why they believe in a literal six-day creation. 7)

The Nature of Time

One of the many advantages that 20th century science has given us is that, thanks to Dr. Albert Einstein's brilliant discoveries, we now know that time is a physical property and is subject to mass, acceleration, and gravity. We have come to realize that we live in a four-dimensional continuum properly known as "space-time." (This is what Paul seems to imply in his letter to the Ephesians!8) It is interesting that when one takes the apparent 1012 expansion factor involved in the theories of the "expanding universe," that an assumed 16 billion years reduce to six days!

Furthermore, the astronomical timetables now seem to be entirely overturned with the reluctant acknowledgments that the speed of light is not longer regarded as the constant that the high priests of physics had been previously convinced of.

The Nature of Light

Not only have recent scientific articles highlighted the discoveries that the speed of light has changed over the centuries (something that Barry Setterfield has been declaring for decades) the very nature of light has ripped open the entire world of quantum physics that has shattered our concepts of reality itself.

The changes in the velocity of light not only impacts our understanding of the astronomical distances and properties, it affects the atomic behavior involved in the red shift of spectra, the reliability of radiological dating, etc. It is the peculiar properties of photons themselves that continue to astonish the quantum physicists wrestling with the very nature of our physical existence. It is now recognized that subatomic particles lack a property known as "locality." All subatomic particles are now understood to be immediately connected. There is a simultaneity - a "non-locality" - among all photons that has been confirmed in the laboratory. It now appears that our entire universe may actually be a gigantic hologram of some kind. 9

The Fabric of Space

Most of us assume that space is simply an empty vacuum with nothing "in it." However, it is increasingly evident that even empty space has astonishing properties that have yet to be fully understood. We now know that this "firmament,"(raqia) which the Scripture presents, possesses electromagnetic properties including dielectric permittivity, magnetic permeability, an intrinsic impedance,10 and has an astonishing "zero-point" energy sufficient to keep all the electrons in the entire universe in their orbits.11 The term "stretching the heavens" appears at least 17 times in the Scriptures.12

According to the Scriptures, the heavens can be "torn,"13 "worn out" like a garment,14 "shaken,"15 "burnt up,"16 "split apart" like a scroll,17 rolled up" like a mantle 18 or a scroll.19

The concept of being "rolled up" carries some additional insights. There must be some dimension in which space is "thin." If space can be "bent," there must be a direction it can be bent toward. Thus, this tells us that there must be additional dimensions beyond those of space itself. It is now understood that we live in even more than four dimensions: ten dimensions is the current estimate (which is precisely what Nachmonides concluded in his commentary on Genesis back in the 13th century!) The more we understand from the current perspectives of modern physics, the more comfortable we are with the chronicle in Genesis One.

The Architecture of the Solar System

The more we study our solar system, the more questions get raised. Here, too, the prevailing assumptions that are broadly taught are totally specious. The "Nebular Hypothesis," that the planets were somehow thrown off by the sun, is mathematically untenable. There is no plausible explanation that would support a solar origin of the planets. The sun contains 99.86% of all the mass of the solar system, and yet contains only 1.9% of the angular momentum. The nine planets contain 98.1%. Furthermore, the outer planets are far larger than the inner ones. (Jupiter is 5,750 times as massive as mercury, 2,958 times as massive as Mars, etc.)

There are many other provocative enigmas concerning our planetary history:

o There are three pairs of rapid-spin rates among our planets: Mars and Earth, Jupiter and Saturn, and Neptune and Uranus, are each within 3% of each other. Why?

o Earth and Mars have virtually identical spin axis tilts (about 23.5°). Why? (From angular momentum and orbital calculations, it would seem that the three pairs of these planets may have been brought here from elsewhere.)

o Why does Mars have 93% of its craters in one hemisphere and only 7% in the other? It would appear that over 80% occurred within a single half-hour!

It's almost as if God designed it to challenge any naturalistic hypotheses!

"Evening" and "Morning"?

The Hebrew terms, Erev,and Boker, now refer to "evening" and "morning" but their origins remain obscure. Erev

designates obscuration, mixture (increasing entropy). The time when encroaching darkness begins to deny the ability to discern forms, shapes, and identities; thus, it becomes a term for twilight or evening.20 This also marks the duration of impurity, when a ceremonially unclean person became clean again,21 and thus, the beginning of the Hebrew day.

Boker is a designation for becoming discernible, distinguishable, visible; perception of order; relief of obscurity (decreasing entropy). It thus is associated with being able to begin to discern forms, shapes, and distinct identities; breaking forth of light; revealing; hence, denotatively, dawn, morning. (As traditional designations for the Hebrew day, technically it would seem to only designate the nighttime hours, but it is used connotatively for the entire calendar day.)

It is noteworthy that neither of these are recorded on the seventh day, and thus their original significance may have been to designate the increments of creation.

Other Issues

There are other questions that arise from the Genesis narrative. When was the earth created? It seems to have preceded the rest of the universe. Surprisingly, there are some cosmologists that are (again) beginning to suspect that the universe may be geocentric after all! How did plants (3rd day) flourish without the sun's photosynthesis (4th day)? When were the angels created? (They apparently witnessed the events of Genesis 1.) 22 When did Satan fall? He had apparently already fallen by Chapter 3.

As we explore these, and other, enigmas that emerge from the Biblical text, let us not confuse the precision of the text with conjectures and mythology that pervades our pagan culture and uninformed classrooms. (It's tragic that we can't insist on evidence-based education for our children rather than the foolishness and dogma that continues to strip them of their God-fearing heritage.)

But the more acquainted you become with the amazing discoveries and insights from the frontiers of science - and are able to dismiss the nonsense that prevails among the uninformed - the more comfortable the Genesis text becomes! We plan to continue this series of articles in the unmitigated aspiration of stimulating you to dig ever deeper into God's inerrant Word!


Notes:      

  1. Matthew 8:4; 19:7,8; 23:2; Mark 1:44; 10:3,4; 7:10; Luke 5:14; 16:19, 31; 20:37; 24:27,44; John 3:14; 5:39,45,46; 6:32; 7:19, 22,23.
  2. Matthew 13:35; Mark 13:19; John 1:3; Acts 4:24; 14:15; Romans 1:20; 2 Corinthians 4:6; Colossians 1:16; Hebrews 1:10; 11:3.
  3. Romans 1:25; 16:25; Ephesians 3:9; 1 Timothy 4:4; Hebrews 2:10; 4:10; 9:26; James 3:9; Revelation 3:14; 4:11; 10:6; 14:7.
  4. Matthew 19:4-6, 8; Mark 10:6; Acts 17:26; 1 Corinthians 6:16; 11:8,9; Ephesians 5:31; 1 Timothy 2:13, 14; Revelation 2:7; 22:2, 14.
  5. Romans 5:11, 14, 17, 19; 8:19-20; 1 Corinthians 15:21-22; 2 Corinthians 11:3; Revelation 20:2.
  6. Matthew 24:37; Luke 17:26; 1 Peter 3:20; 2 Peter 2:5; 3:5-61.
  7. John F. Ashton, In Six Days , Master Books, Green Forest AR, 2001.
  8. Ephesians 3:18.
  9. Cf. "Information in the Holographic Universe," Scientific American , August 2003.
  10. Any radio ham that has had to tune an antenna array knows about the 377 ohms.
  11. It has been estimated at a staggering 1.071 x 10117 kilowatts per square meter!
  12. 2 Samuel 22:10; Job 9:8; 26:7; 37:18; Psalm 18:9; 104:2; 144:5; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; Ezekiel 1:22; Zechariah 12:1.
  13. Isaiah 64:1.
  14. Psalm 102:25.
  15. Hebrews 12:26, Haggai 2:6, Isaiah 13:13.
  16. 2 Peter 3:12.
  17. Revelation 6:14.
  18. Hebrews 1:12.
  19. Isaiah 34:4.
  20. Proverbs 7:9; Jeremiah 6:4.
  21. Leviticus 15.
  22. Job 4:7.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: creation; evolution; god
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-546 next last
To: Elsie
Likewise..... where our machines have crawled around on the surface of Mars, NOTHING has been detected by the scientific appratus on board that has shown any 'life' signs.
101 posted on 11/16/2003 12:47:41 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Hermann the Cherusker
Why not? The Earth is the center of the Universe, and Man the foremost thing on Earth. The language of the Bible is that the Sun, Moon, and Stars revolve around a stationary Earth. Thus, Sun stops in its tranist across the sky for Joshua

The Man is the pinnacle of creation. As far as I know, nowhere in the Bible, does it say that Earth is the center of the Universe. Earth may be the focal point but, certainly, not a center in any geometric sense.

However, if you are talking about human perception, it does appear the Sun, Moon, stars, planets, galaxies do revolve around planet Earth. I just think that it is presumptuous for us to assume that our perception is equivalent to that of the Lord.

Either we are a bunch of electrons descended from a monkey, or we are God's pinnacle of creation.

We certainly are a bunch of electrons (as well as other particles). The Bible does say that we were made of clay. So, on some level, we do resemble monkeys - as well as all other living organisms. The Bible does mention, however, that we (not the monkeys) were made in Lord's image. Clearly it does not mean that we are physically made in the Lord's image. Traditionally the part of Man that was believed to be "made in Lord's image" was the soul. If you prefer, we can call it reason. It is, however, indisputable that, at a certain level, we are significantly different from monkeys.
102 posted on 11/16/2003 12:47:42 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Dang!!

Come run MY company!!!!!
103 posted on 11/16/2003 12:49:20 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Yes, which point would you like to start with.
104 posted on 11/16/2003 12:50:58 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
Yeah...

We only got's TWO opposable thumbs!

(Note to self: check Demo's and Lib's feet next time I'm able......)
105 posted on 11/16/2003 12:51:24 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
either one.......
106 posted on 11/16/2003 12:51:58 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
I have pointed to many scriptures. Are we talking about the so called contradiction of "day" of creation, done by Moses.

Help me out or else we will have to start with Genesis 1:1 and go from there.
107 posted on 11/16/2003 12:54:07 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Well then: since even the great Roman Empire was drawn into His influence, just what DO you believe has caused the obviously illogical following of so many people (in the first century --dang! I can't even get away from Him there...) to worship and adore a blatent fabrication?

How do you explain 1.3 billion followers of Mohamed? How about billions (do not know the actual count) of various types of Buddhists?

When Lord ordered Abraham to begin the practice of circumcision, Abraham objection was that he would loose many followers. To this Lord replied that there would be enough. The meaning of the reply is disputed. The clear implication, however, is that the numbers matter less then the faith.
108 posted on 11/16/2003 12:57:31 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
(Why is this so hard??)

That "tree" in Genesis was Satan. Actually, Satan's greatest deception has not happened yet, "he" gets to play the role as "Christ". Do you know which Christ shows up first?

What about that scripture that says that Christ became our sabbath, thus not one day but every day?

94 posted on 11/16/2003 2:20 PM CST by Just mythoughts


To: Just mythoughts

Huh?

Can you post some Scripture to illustrate your points?

97 posted on 11/16/2003 2:33 PM CST by Elsie


Point ONE or Point TWO
109 posted on 11/16/2003 12:58:17 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Yeah...

We only got's TWO opposable thumbs!


Taking a brief look at the parts of the city visible through the windows of my house, I would be willing to bet there are more differences between humans and monkeys (even between humans and great apes) then the number of opposable thumbs.
110 posted on 11/16/2003 1:01:18 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
When Lord ordered Abraham to begin the practice of circumcision, Abraham objection was that he would loose many followers.
 
Oh??  Where?
 
Genesis 17
 
 1.  When Abram was ninety-nine years old, the LORD appeared to him and said, "I am God Almighty ; walk before me and be blameless.
 2.  I will confirm my covenant between me and you and will greatly increase your numbers."
 3.  Abram fell facedown, and God said to him,
 4.  "As for me, this is my covenant with you: You will be the father of many nations.
 5.  No longer will you be called Abram ; your name will be Abraham,  for I have made you a father of many nations.
 6.  I will make you very fruitful; I will make nations of you, and kings will come from you.
 7.  I will establish my covenant as an everlasting covenant between me and you and your descendants after you for the generations to come, to be your God and the God of your descendants after you.
 8.  The whole land of Canaan, where you are now an alien, I will give as an everlasting possession to you and your descendants after you; and I will be their God."

 9.  Then God said to Abraham, "As for you, you must keep my covenant, you and your descendants after you for the generations to come.
 10.  This is my covenant with you and your descendants after you, the covenant you are to keep: Every male among you shall be circumcised.
 11.  You are to undergo circumcision, and it will be the sign of the covenant between me and you.
 12.  For the generations to come every male among you who is eight days old must be circumcised, including those born in your household or bought with money from a foreigner--those who are not your offspring.
 13.  Whether born in your household or bought with your money, they must be circumcised. My covenant in your flesh is to be an everlasting covenant.
 14.  Any uncircumcised male, who has not been circumcised in the flesh, will be cut off from his people; he has broken my covenant."
 15.  God also said to Abraham, "As for Sarai your wife, you are no longer to call her Sarai; her name will be Sarah.
 16.  I will bless her and will surely give you a son by her. I will bless her so that she will be the mother of nations; kings of peoples will come from her."
 17.  Abraham fell facedown; he laughed and said to himself, "Will a son be born to a man a hundred years old? Will Sarah bear a child at the age of ninety?"
 18.  And Abraham said to God, "If only Ishmael might live under your blessing!"
 19.  Then God said, "Yes, but your wife Sarah will bear you a son, and you will call him Isaac.  I will establish my covenant with him as an everlasting covenant for his descendants after him.
 20.  And as for Ishmael, I have heard you: I will surely bless him; I will make him fruitful and will greatly increase his numbers. He will be the father of twelve rulers, and I will make him into a great nation.
 21.  But my covenant I will establish with Isaac, whom Sarah will bear to you by this time next year."
 22.  When he had finished speaking with Abraham, God went up from him.
 23.  On that very day Abraham took his son Ishmael and all those born in his household or bought with his money, every male in his household, and circumcised them, as God told him.
 24.  Abraham was ninety-nine years old when he was circumcised,
 25.  and his son Ishmael was thirteen;
 26.  Abraham and his son Ishmael were both circumcised on that same day.
 27.  And every male in Abraham's household, including those born in his household or bought from a foreigner, was circumcised with him.
 
 

111 posted on 11/16/2003 1:02:48 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
How do you explain 1.3 billion followers of Mohamed? How about billions (do not know the actual count) of various types of Buddhists?

So... you are claiming that all THESE people are wrong as well: HMmmm....

Upon what evidence?

112 posted on 11/16/2003 1:05:17 PM PST by Elsie (Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Just mythoughts
It is written where, the most FAVORITE place of our Heavenly Father's is and it is here on this planet earth.

Earth may, in fact, be Lord's favorite place, but this does not mean it is a geometrically central point in Creation. Nor does it mean that Lord's concept of time is dictated by the period of Earth's rotation.
113 posted on 11/16/2003 1:06:29 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Well, true, but you wouldn't expect them to be on the mmon either. Regardless of when plants (bacteria) would have started here on earth.

The moon is thought to have been formed bya large galancing collision with an asteroid-sized impact: this melted/blew out 1/6 of the earth back into orbit, where it reconsolidated into a sphere (melting again any fossils that might have been blown out into space....) and then the center core of the moon was re-melted into the seas under future impacts/and that (already thrice melted!) was splashed and shattered again under meteorite impact as the rocks on the moon' surface got hit.

So any early fossils from plants (like the iron deposits in Michigan or the sea-side piles of microbes off Australia) that might have been present simply couldn't survive recognizably as fossils.

---...---

Above all that melting and destruction, we simply have not found any microbe traces as old as the theorectical age of the moon. (Yet, he cautioned!) So, when the moon got blasted out from the earth's crust, there might not have been life created yet here either.
114 posted on 11/16/2003 1:11:10 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Genesis 2:9 And out of the ground made the Lord God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food;

the tree of life also in the midst of the garden,

and

the tree of knowledge of good and evil.

We have three types of trees described, first for food, second for "life", and the third with "KNOWLEDGE" of good and evil.
115 posted on 11/16/2003 1:12:49 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
"yom"

"evening and morning"

"by faith we understand that the world was framed by the word of God" - Hebrews 11
116 posted on 11/16/2003 1:14:01 PM PST by Louisiana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bondserv
Let's say you want to explain how you just created the world to someone who has absolutely no scientific knowledge. Would you tell them exactly what happened, or would you make it into a story that people can understand?

Think of how you might explain something to children who don't have the understanding of the thing that you do.
117 posted on 11/16/2003 1:15:38 PM PST by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
"the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night...

and let them serve as signs to mark seasons and days and years,
... and let them be lights in the expanse of the sky to give light on the earth

Feeling picky? 8<)

"Governing" the night and the day by reading "signs" in the sky sounds like navigation to me ... After all, the men walking in the desert are governed by the stars they can see: No stars, no science. Also, notice they were "set" in their positions at this point in time, not that they were created. (Again, being picky...)

No sense of mystery about the universe either.

118 posted on 11/16/2003 1:16:00 PM PST by Robert A Cook PE (I can only support FR by donating monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: bluejay
That is certainly a "possibility". That being the case, really lets "us" know who is in control cause we don't know the answer to that among many other things.
119 posted on 11/16/2003 1:16:37 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Oh?? Where?

(Refering to the source that describes conversation between Abraham and Lord regarding circumcision.)

One of the traditional Jewish sources: Genesis Rabbah 46:3. Abraham objection was recorded as: "Until now [converts] have come to join themselves to me [to know You]. Do You say that once I have been circumcised, they [will continue] to come and join themselves to me?" Lord's reply was recorded as: "It is sufficient for my world that I should be its patron".
120 posted on 11/16/2003 1:18:20 PM PST by bluejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 541-546 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson