Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Master of the Sea (and the French)[NY Times Review of "Master and Commander"]
N.Y. Times online ^ | November 14, 2003 | A. O. SCOTT

Posted on 11/14/2003 6:18:15 AM PST by eddie willers

MOVIE REVIEW | 'MASTER AND COMMANDER'

Master of the Sea (and the French)

By A. O. SCOTT

Published: November 14, 2003

"DO you want to see a guillotine in Piccadilly? Do you want your children to grow up singing the 'Marseillaise'?" This is Jack Aubrey, commander of H.M.S. Surprise, rousing the patriotism of his men as they prepare to engage a faster, larger French vessel somewhere off the coast of South America. This ship is England, he proclaims, and "Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World," which opens nationwide today, makes his point with magnificent vigor and precision.

This stupendously entertaining movie, directed by Peter Weir and adapted from two of the novels in Patrick O'Brian's 20-volume series on Aubrey's naval exploits, celebrates an idea of England that might have seemed a bit corny even in 1805, when the action takes place. The Surprise is a stiffly hierarchal place of pomp and ritual that is nonetheless consecrated to ideals of fair play, decency and honor and ruled by a man whose claim on the words in the film's title comes, if not by divine right, then at least by demi-godlike force of character.

Of course, life on the Surprise is not all high-minded talk and principled action. Winston Churchill once said that the foundations of British naval tradition consisted of rum, sodomy and the lash. "Master and Commander," which is rated PG-13, settles for two out of three.

It is tempting to read some contemporary geopolitical relevance into this film, which appears at a moment when some of the major English-speaking nations are joined in a military alliance against foes we sometimes need to be reminded do not actually include France.

The Surprise may be England, but "Master and Commander" is something of an all-Anglosphere collaboration. Both the director and the star, Russell Crowe, are Australian (Mr. Crowe by way of New Zealand), and no fewer than three American studios (Universal, Miramax and 20th Century Fox, which is the United States distributor) paid for the production. The spectacle of British imperial self-defense has been made more palatable for American audiences by a discreet emendation of the literary source: the story has been moved back seven years from the War of 1812, when the British were fighting . . . but never mind. Bygones are bygones.

And in any case, the appeal of O'Brian's books to modern audiences goes deeper than their coincidental intersection with present-day diplomacy or politics. Since 1970, when the first installment was published, the series has gathered a fervent and loyal following that mere topicality could hardly account for. Mr. Weir's movie, which follows Jack's command of sharp word and quick action in transporting O'Brian's information-packed pages onto the screen, distills the essence of Aubrey's charisma.

Aubrey (Mr. Crowe) is an ideal personification of modern executive authority — the Harry Potter of the managerial class. His adventures are salted with arcane technical lore and administrative wisdom that resonate deeply with even the most landlubberly middle managers and office workers. "Master and Commander," were it not a movie, could be a Powerpoint seminar advertised in an airline magazine: Leadership Secrets of the Royal Navy.

This is not by any means to slight Mr. Weir's accomplishment (or, for that matter, O'Brian's); it is, rather, to explain why, in his expert hands, the smallest details of shipboard behavior become so breathlessly absorbing. The battle sequences are filmed with impressive coherence and rigor, but "Master and Commander" is, if anything, most thrilling between skirmishes, when the complex system of authority and deference that runs the Surprise — and the personality traits needed to keep it running — is at the center of attention.

Jack Aubrey's ship is part of a larger bureaucratic system that defines the limits of his autonomy and the particulars of his duty; but he is, within these parameters, free to be creative, even somewhat reckless, in pursuit of his designated goals. His work is occasionally brutal and dangerous, but he clearly loves it; an almost gleeful smile plays across Mr. Crowe's meaty face as each battle draws near. Passionate as he is about his vocation, Aubrey is not an utter workaholic. He likes to get drunk and regale the other officers with bad jokes, to play the violin, and to make eyes at a Brazilian beauty who shows up for a few silent seconds to remind the audience of the existence of women.

Who needs them, anyway? Jack does write letters home to his wife, and makes a ribald toast in the officers' mess, but the Surprise is a world of unstinting and diverse manliness. In the best war-movie tradition, "Master and Commander" is in essence a study of male camaraderie under duress. The motley ensemble of officers and ordinary seamen display vivid flashes of individuality as they go about their shipboard business. Especially fine are George Innes as a toothless old-timer, Robert Pugh as the Surprise's rotund and pompous Master and Max Pirkis as Blakeney, a very young aristocratic midshipman.

At the center of the picture is the friendship between Aubrey and Stephen Maturin, the ship's surgeon, played by Paul Bettany. Mr. Bettany, sensitive, quick-witted and easygoing, makes a fine sidekick for the fierce Mr. Crowe, and this is his second tour of duty. In "A Beautiful Mind" his character, John Nash's imaginary roommate, was a man of letters to Mr. Crowe's man of numbers; this time, he is a man of ideas, and as such the perfect foil for Mr. Crowe's man of action. Aubrey and Maturin, who play stately cello and fiddle duets in the captain's cabin after meals, argue about the nature of power and the competing claims of scientific inquiry (Maturin is a naturalist as well as a physician) and military duty.

Not that Maturin is a sissy: he can handle a sword when he needs to, and, in one of Mr. Weir's many dazzling close-up set pieces, he performs abdominal surgery on himself. Nor is Aubrey simply a brute; he shows both a keen tactical mind and surprising delicacy of feeling. But he is, above all, the embodiment of English practicality (Maturin's background, by the way, is Irish and Catalan), ruled by instinct and habit rather than intellect. At one point he tries to impart the essence of leadership to Hollum (Lee Ingleby), a timorous young midshipman who has lost the esteem of the men. The younger man parrots Jack's words and you realize that, in his mouth, discipline and respect are abstractions rather than living principles, and that he is therefore tragically unsuited for command.

The Napoleonic wars that followed the French Revolution gave birth, among other things, to British conservatism, and "Master and Commander," making no concessions to modern, egalitarian sensibilities, is among the most thoroughly and proudly conservative movies ever made. It imagines the Surprise as a coherent society in which stability is underwritten by custom and every man knows his duty and his place. I would not have been surprised to see Edmund Burke's name in the credits.

Mr. Weir's direction is appropriately old-fashioned, which is not to say that it is staid. It is rare, nowadays, to see a story of such scale and complexity filmed with such clarity, swiftness and attention to detail. O'Brian's command of nautical lore and maritime history was always remarkable, but it also tended to oversaturate his narratives with data. In Mr. Weir's version, every nail, every rope, every teacup and brass button is in more or less its place, but rather than feeling fussy and antiquarian, as so many Hollywood costume pageants do, "Master and Commander" hums with humor, passion and life. It makes you wish Napoleon were still around, so we — that is, I mean, the British Empire — could beat him all over again.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: commander; conservatism; crowe; master; masterandcommander; movie; moviereview; review
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: B-Chan
I was just thinking that Peter Weir ought to do a space movie of the grand scale as this "Master and Commander" seems to be. Think of all the tools Peter Weir would have as his disposal. Sort of a Star Wars with cajones!
41 posted on 11/16/2003 11:39:44 AM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: B-Chan
"The question is: why can't Paramount make a Star Trek movie as good as purports to be?)"

Come to think of it, the best Trek movies had William Shatner(Kirk) in them, even "Generations".!
42 posted on 11/16/2003 11:45:14 AM PST by mdmathis6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
At least 20 people walked out of my theater without returning.

Were they French?

Try reading one of the novels. It's possible that Patrick O'Brian is just not to your taste.

43 posted on 11/16/2003 11:49:09 AM PST by Huber (11 Presidents, 2372 judicial nominations, zero fillibusters...till now!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cpu
The movie is beautifully made, but glaring liberties were taken with nautical reality.

Reminds me of the very old Letterman bit (pre-CBS)-he had a professional welder critique Jennifer Beals (sp) welding technique in "Flashdance".

My uncle, a physician and toxicologist, would comment on the faulty technique of a movie "pathaologist" doing frozen sections for an autopsy.

At some point the layman in the audience just has to say, "Shhhhh".
44 posted on 11/16/2003 11:51:47 AM PST by G L Tirebiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Huber
I may just try that... I love a good book.
45 posted on 11/16/2003 11:52:07 AM PST by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
You were bored? I don't understand that. I loved it. I thought he broke off the chase and took Bones, I mean Dr. Maturin to the Galapagos because he discovered the sail he was chasing was not the Acheron. It was not a perfect movie, but close enough.
46 posted on 11/16/2003 11:57:53 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Oh my... the first 45 minutes were PAINFULLY slow.

I was so confused when, after the slick sailing maneuvre, they came up behind the Acheron. But, rather than attack, they somehow mysteriously ended up in a terrible storm 500 miles south of where they were the night before. I was wondering whether 15 minutes of film dissapeared?????

Can anyone explain this??
47 posted on 11/16/2003 12:03:00 PM PST by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Ahoy Freeper Maties and shiver me timbers! I done seed the movie, and this be one great flick!

This has to be the opposite of a "chick flick," yet will probably yield a best picture Oscar nomination. Sequels are sure to follow.

Incidentally Matrix Revolutions seriously sucked.

48 posted on 11/16/2003 12:08:13 PM PST by friendly (Man is so made that whenever anything fires his soul, impossibilities vanish.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
As I remember it Surprise was closing on Acheron when the seas got rough, as they always do around Tierra del Fuego, and Aubrey kept up the chase through the gail, making 12 knots, until his mizzenmast broke and Acheron got away.

You weren't moved by that boy in the waves after they cut the mast loose?

49 posted on 11/16/2003 12:58:39 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Brave Rifles! Veterans! You have been baptized in fire and blood and have come out steel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
That was a moving scene. My problem was, the "seas getting rough" happened in the blink of an eye. In one scene, they show the Acheron on the horizon... with light clouds and sunshine. Next scene?? The worst storm of all time. It was quite disjointed.

The storm scenes were fantastic. It just happened way to suddenly.

There were plenty of great scenes... sprinkled throughout an otherwise boring, and disturbing film..
50 posted on 11/16/2003 3:42:53 PM PST by SomeCallMeTim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Cool. I was hoping to see the exploits of Stephen Decatur.
51 posted on 11/16/2003 4:53:29 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
We saw it yesterday & it was marvelous. The storm scene, on the ship made me very uncomfortable, in its reality. I have not always liked Russel Crowe's movies but this one is exceptional. He is perfect in the role & the attention to detail is amazing.
52 posted on 11/16/2003 5:07:57 PM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Saw the movie today and was amazed. A great flick and one that didn't have to resort to graphic gore to make the horrors of war seen and felt. This film is powerful and yet can go straight from the movie theater to Broadcast television without a cut or edit being made. I strongly recommend this film.
53 posted on 11/18/2003 8:28:17 PM PST by Burkeman1 ((If you see ten troubles comin down the road, Nine will run into the ditch before they reach you.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
Just saw it last night, enjoyed it very much.

A toast to Master and Commander


54 posted on 11/21/2003 12:35:03 PM PST by machman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huber
Finally saw the movie, watched it last night here in the Engineroom, can't wait to get it home and see it on the big screen.
But, as a fan of POB's series, I thought the movie lacked bottom. The characters of Maturin and Bonden missed the mark.
I am listening to the recorded books version now when traveling to & from the boat and really like them. Tull does a great job with Maturin's character.

Stephen Maturin on Seamanship:
"Puddings, We trice 'em athwart the starboard gumbrils, when sailing by and large."
55 posted on 04/21/2004 7:23:15 PM PDT by orlop9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I finally saw this movie now that it is out on DVD. I found it very enjoyable, although the ending was a bit anti-climatic.

Still--a wonderful tale. Sort of the Conservative antithesis to wheezy Liberal films such as The English Patient.

By the way, I love the old drinking songs they sing:

"Safe ashore at laaaasst Jack!
Folly Rolly Rolly Rolly Rigghhhht---oohh!"

56 posted on 04/28/2004 3:39:54 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eddie willers
I dunno, maybe it wouldn't have been too bad if Napoleon HAD conquered the continent and the British Isles. He was a closet Zionist with plans to create Zion a 150 years earlier than it did. He also would have given Europe a firm control over the Middle East and probably averted WWI and II. Plus, he was Corsican, not French.
57 posted on 04/28/2004 4:24:45 AM PDT by Cronos (I AM good at math 3.3+2.8 = 6.1!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cronos
I am sure it worked out according to the Almighty's plan.

Besides, I toured Versilles and Notre Dame once. The whole Napoleonic ego "I crown myself emperor" was a little too much to take.

58 posted on 04/28/2004 4:35:46 AM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson