Guess all the Justice Roy Moore bashers are full of sh*t after all!
1 posted on
11/13/2003 5:52:19 PM PST by
ppaul
To: ppaul
bttt
To: ppaul
Well duh! ; )
3 posted on
11/13/2003 5:55:32 PM PST by
TigersEye
("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
To: ppaul
:-}
4 posted on
11/13/2003 5:55:50 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Diogenes
Is this smaller or larger than Judge Moore's "rock"?
5 posted on
11/13/2003 5:56:43 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: ppaul
Thomas Van Orden, a homeless man living in Austin
Sounds like a prayer life wouldn't hurt him at all.
6 posted on
11/13/2003 5:57:25 PM PST by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: ppaul
Looks like it's soon going to be time for Sandra Day O'Connor to start looking at French public opinion polls again so she can tailor her ruling to fit their sensibilities.
7 posted on
11/13/2003 5:59:19 PM PST by
CFC__VRWC
(AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
To: ppaul
"The Ten Commandments are undoubtedly a sacred religious text, but they are also a foundational document in the development of Western legal codes and culture," Abbott said Thursday. "The Texas monument has stood for over 40 years, and the court's decision affirms that the monument is entirely consistent with the requirements of the U.S. Constitution."Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott understands the Constitution!
To: ppaul
Of all days to have this news. I will pray for Judge Moore to be returned to his position.
11 posted on
11/13/2003 6:01:00 PM PST by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: ppaul
Just wonderin here. How does a "homeless" man afford to hire a lawyer to sue in Federal court?
13 posted on
11/13/2003 6:02:04 PM PST by
navyblue
To: ppaul
Guess all the Justice Roy Moore bashers are full of sh*t after all! Do you kiss your mother with that mouth?
14 posted on
11/13/2003 6:02:12 PM PST by
Hillary's Lovely Legs
(I have a plan. I need a dead monkey, empty liquor bottles and a vacuum cleaner.)
To: ppaul
Guess all the Justice Roy Moore bashers are full of sh*t after all! No, Mr. Moorer insisted he was placing it because it was the religious basis of our country and that was what was prohibited.
The Federal Circuit Court was clear on that.
If he had placed it, as the Texas copy was placed, as "a foundational document in the development of Western legal codes and culture" it could have stayed.
It was not the Ten Commandments that were prohibited, but the Ten Commandments placed for religious reasons.
So9
27 posted on
11/13/2003 6:21:05 PM PST by
Servant of the 9
(Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
To: ppaul
alright!
To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
HLL, you've gotta admit that the contradictory logic is maddening. One monument OK, another monument not OK.
"God save the court" is OK. "In God we Trust" is OK.
In your heart, you know that these decisions defy balancing on the head of a pin.
35 posted on
11/13/2003 6:36:09 PM PST by
xzins
(With deepest respect to General Boykin)
To: ppaul
key segments of law founded on the moral and cultural ethics provided by the commandments.This is an interesting distinction. A lot of lefties believe that anything referred to as "morality" is no different from religion.
Of course, quite a few of us who believe in God, believe the same thing. i.e.: morality comes from following God's law.
But the secular law can and should treat them as separate concepts. "Thou shalt not steal" is unambiguously a moral concept, whether you believe it comes from God or not.
I guess I don't have a point. Just making an observation that has some bearing on the fight to keep the Ten Commandments from being removed from public life.
46 posted on
11/13/2003 7:22:07 PM PST by
irv
To: ppaul
Where would a homeless man get the funds to sue??
48 posted on
11/13/2003 7:26:06 PM PST by
PeyersPatches
(I AM intestinal fortitude)
To: ppaul
Guess all the Justice Roy Moore bashers are full of sh*t after all!
I knew it all along did'nt you ?
To: solitonic; ConservativeMan55; Byron_the_Aussie; NewLand; BenR2; LiteKeeper; daughterofTGSL; ...
Good news from Texas, Ping!
To: ppaul
Oh...I'll bet the USSC will be willing to hear this one! Just wait and see.
54 posted on
11/13/2003 7:44:51 PM PST by
Revel
To: ppaul
The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the state's position that the placement of the Ten Commandments monument on the Capitol grounds is not an unconstitutional attempt to establish state-sponsored religion.That's because no law was passed that authorized the Ten Commandments monument to be placed on the Capitol grounds.
57 posted on
11/13/2003 7:52:52 PM PST by
usadave
To: ppaul
Where did a homeless person get the money to file a law suit?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson