Skip to comments.
Alabama ousts
Justice Moore
9-member judicial panel rules against chief for defying order
WND ^
| 11-13-03
| WND
Posted on 11/13/2003 9:51:45 AM PST by mgist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
This is kind of scary folks . . . I'm not a Christian Conservative, but this whole deal gives me the creeps. What can be done?
1
posted on
11/13/2003 9:51:47 AM PST
by
mgist
To: mgist
INTREP - SAD DAY FOR JUDICIAL AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
To: mgist
This decision should not scrare you.
Moore's arguments were much like the arguments that have been made many other times... "My religion prohibits me from filing a federal tax return.... My allegience is to God, not man, so I cannot obey a judge's order to do this or that..."
If Moore desired to be a martyr, he should stop complaining about being martyred.
To: LiteKeeper
Yes it is a sad day. Why does the "law" apply to some and not others?
To: 11th Earl of Mar
What is so wrong with the 10 commandments and believing in God?
5
posted on
11/13/2003 10:00:27 AM PST
by
mgist
To: LiteKeeper
"Judicial freedom"?
Is this new? And isn't Roe v. Wade a product of 'judicial freedom'?
To: 11th Earl of Mar
But he should run for the post again as soon as possible. Wouldn't that slap them in the eye?
7
posted on
11/13/2003 10:01:21 AM PST
by
Ingtar
(Understanding is a three-edged sword : your side, my side, and the truth in between ." -- Kosh)
To: mgist
What is so wrong with the 10 commandments and believing in God? Nothing's wrong with it. But then, Moore wasn't removed for that.
8
posted on
11/13/2003 10:02:10 AM PST
by
Ichneumon
To: LiteKeeper
INTREP - SAD DAY FOR JUDICIAL AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOMYep! And some day the truth will come out that the justices are nobile literally.
9
posted on
11/13/2003 10:02:28 AM PST
by
Ff--150
(Now unto Him Who is able to do)
To: mgist
I agreed with Roy until he decided that he could defy the order to remove the monument. He should have obeyed the order and continued the fight through the courts. Had Roy made a decision on a citizen and they didn't like it for whatever reason, do you think he would have said, "Well OK"?
He has the right fight but he used the wrong weapons and tactics.
I hope things work out for him because he is a good man.
10
posted on
11/13/2003 10:04:25 AM PST
by
Conspiracy Guy
(I don't think you hread me right.)
To: mgist
Nothing is wrong with the 10 Commandments.
And I was on Moore's side until I read, here on FR, that Moore removed a 10 Commandment display in the courthouse and replaced it with a much larger 3 ton display in the middle of the courthouse routunda.
I think Moore was begging for a fight and finally got it.
To: mgist
The ACLU has spoken. All bow.
12
posted on
11/13/2003 10:04:57 AM PST
by
auboy
(If frogs had wings, it would be raining warts.)
To: Ff--150
Thank God he's off the bench! Now we can run him for president. I don't care if he wants to invade France or wants to raise taxes to 90% across the board. I'll vote for him.
To: mgist
What part of elected are they having trouble with?
14
posted on
11/13/2003 10:05:58 AM PST
by
grania
("Won't get fooled again")
To: LiteKeeper
And a very sad day for America.
15
posted on
11/13/2003 10:06:09 AM PST
by
mulligan
To: Ichneumon
Nothing's wrong with it. But then, Moore wasn't removed for that.>>>
Wasn't he removed for defying orders based on his interpretation that he was consitutionally obliged to allow that belief.
16
posted on
11/13/2003 10:06:43 AM PST
by
mgist
To: mgist
"And my oath of office to the Constitution requires an acknowledgment of God," he said. "It's that simple."
Well then do so quietly. My daughter acknowledges God in school -- and a public school at that -- every day, but she doesn't insist on making others listen to it or put up a large monument.
Moore is a publicity hound, pure and simple. He got what he deserved.
17
posted on
11/13/2003 10:07:06 AM PST
by
kegler4
To: grania
What part of elected are they having trouble with? Didn't stop me from wanting Clinton impeached.
18
posted on
11/13/2003 10:07:35 AM PST
by
OWK
To: mgist
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(Sigh)
Basically what we can do is show the First Amendment to the people and ask where does it say that the authorities can ban the religion they deem "oppressive".
Point out the hypocrisy that teachers can wear and display any religious symbols except Christianity.
Show the contradiction within the judicial process where the justices (ha!) have to pray before each court session.
Demonstrate to people that Christianity does not equal racism, oppression, sexism, etc. And if they generalize by using some unChristian nut, say that there are nuts everywhere and point to (Rubbish)Bin Latrine and his horde of unIslamic morons.
Oh yeah, hold big noisy (but nonviolent) protests so that the mangestream media can not avoid us whenever the rights of American Christians are infringed.
Anyone else care to add?
19
posted on
11/13/2003 10:07:54 AM PST
by
Killborn
(Half Thai, Half American, 95% Conservative, 100% Insane)
To: mgist
A recent poll indicated 79 percent of Alabamians would reelected Moore as chief justice. Hmmm...so when would he be able to run? Do they appoint another justice in the interim, and is the interim the remainder of the six-year term?
20
posted on
11/13/2003 10:08:23 AM PST
by
B Knotts
(Go 'Nucks!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson