Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP is becoming America's dominant party
Miami Herald ^ | November 12, 2003 | Paul Crespo

Posted on 11/12/2003 5:52:58 AM PST by GaryL

While an increasingly angry and alienated Democratic Party spouts gloom and doom, the picture appears bright for conservatives and the GOP. Beginning with Arnold Schwarzeneggers victory in California and following last weeks electoral successes in Kentucky and Mississippi, Republicans are consolidating their hold on state and national political offices.

With President Bushs signature of the partial-birth abortion ban, CBS's decision to drop its politicized hatchet job of Ronald Reagan -- one of Americas most beloved presidents -- and the recovering economy spurred by Bushs hefty tax cuts, the American ''right'' seems to be on a roll. Meanwhile, the Democrats seem to be careening further leftward -- and backward -- toward pacifism, pessimism, irrelevance and political suicide.

These are not just short-term GOP gains. While liberal Democrats feverishly try to spin away the reality, the truth is that conservative ideals of entrepreneurship, individual responsibility, smaller government, lower taxes, strong national defense and traditional values have become increasingly mainstream during the past 20 years; the recent GOP successes simply reflect that fact.

In 1983 -- Reagan's third year as president -- Democrats controlled Congress and 23 more state legislatures than did the Republicans. Today the GOP holds both houses of Congress and five more state legislatures than do the Democrats.

That same year, there were 18 more Democrat governors than Republicans; today (after California, Kentucky and Mississippi) there will be 29 GOP governors (five more Republicans than Democrats). Also, the U.S. House had 103 more Democrats than Republicans; today Republicans lead by 24 members.

The Democratic strategy of turning the recent Southern elections into referenda on Bush also failed miserably. In Kentucky, Democrats tried to link GOP nominee Rep. Ernie Fletcher with the ''Bush economy,'' while in Mississippi, Democratic incumbent Ronnie Musgrove tried to attack the Washington ties of former Republican National Committee Chairman Haley Barbour. Republicans won both elections handily.

With these two wins -- which follow GOP gains in Alabama, Georgia and South Carolina -- Republicans have recaptured the growing, dynamic South.

Soon 60 percent of Americans will live in states run by Republicans. With the exception of ''left'' coast enclaves such as Los Angeles and San Francisco, and parts of the ''granola'' Northwest, the GOP continues to dominate the West as well. The only true liberal Democrat stronghold nationally appears to be the Northeast rust belt.

For those who may not have noticed -- the GOP is becoming our dominant party coast to coast.

To bring the point home, U.S. Sen. Zell Miller, D-Ga., who recently endorsed Bushs reelection, titled his new book about the Democrats, A National Party No More. Miller argues that the Democratic Party has become dominated by parochial and extreme left-wing interest groups that are pulling the party further away from the mainstream even while America has shifted rightward since Sept. 11. He adds, ``Its obvious that a train wreck is about to happen with the Democratic Party.''

The GOP future looks good as America's youth also seems to be increasingly conservative. Despite the predominance of left-leaning academics on college campuses, surveys reveal that freshmen are far more traditional than many of their counterculture professors or liberal baby-boomer parents. A national Harvard University poll in October found that 61 percent of college students approved of Bushs job performance.

As the economy improves, Democrats will pin their hopes for success in 2004 on a Bush failure in Iraq. But hurting Bush on Iraq is not good either for Democrats or America. Most Americans -- regardless of party -- are rooting for victory in Iraq. Cynical defeatism in time of war should backfire and hurt Democrats.

Republicans are on the move across America. Democrats need to recognize and adapt to that, or they may find themselves trampled by the stampeding elephants of the GOP.

Paul Crespo is a public-policy analyst and an adjunct faculty member at the University of Miami.

email this | print this


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: elections; gop; republicanmajority
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: GaryL
”...conservative ideals of entrepreneurship, individual responsibility, smaller government, lower taxes, strong national defense and traditional values have become increasingly mainstream during the past 20 years; the recent GOP successes simply reflect that fact.”

In spite of the effort to dumb down our public education with liberal themes and the effort to re-write history in some areas, Americans are still embodied with our Founding Father’s America, a Republic not a democracy.

The left has spawned some pretty anti-American people who never left their socialist beginnings behind when they came here or their children were taught little patriotism and pride in their country while in school. The left can only mimic, just repeat and repeat their rhetoric about what is wrong with this or that administration but never give a coherent way to fix anything. Their echo’s are growing fainter with each passing day. The GOP isn’t perfect, but a far cry from these socialists who would render America impotent, besides, the GOP stands for America and Americans.

21 posted on 11/12/2003 6:44:39 AM PST by yoe (Term Limits - and 2 terms are the limit for all elected to a Federal office!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeangel
Now it will not be enough to elect an "R" - we need to start electing some "R"s with backbone.
22 posted on 11/12/2003 6:46:03 AM PST by Let's Roll (And those that cried Appease! Appease! are hanged by those they tried to please!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Terpfen
He meant that the Democrats are scard "sh*tless" of losing the votes of the younger generation, a group that they've always had in their hip pockets. He did not mean that college students should be scared "sh*tless."
23 posted on 11/12/2003 6:46:59 AM PST by GaryL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All
It is 1932 all over again; the winner in 2004 will set the political agenda for a generation. Republicans are in a position to be the party in power, but they have significant opposition and problems to overcome, mainly the elitist media and leftist academia. This is a watershed period.

Assuming a win, how this power is applied will determine our children’s future. Will we have a flat tax, abortion ban, family friendly media/culture, secure borders and reduced size of government (to name a few)? That is the opportunity; it will be up to us to see this opportunity turned into results.

24 posted on 11/12/2003 6:59:13 AM PST by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
Democratic losses of governorships is harming them significantly in terms of developing leaders. Governors (including now Howard Dean) have become the candidates of choice, and even Howard Dean's ascendancy is reflective of that.

Back in 1980s and 1990s, the Democrats had several governors to pick from as presidential candidates. Clinton, Cuomo, Dukakis. Today who do they have? Their top state governors now are Jennifer Granholm in Michigan (who is constitutionally ineligible to run for President), Bill Richardson in NM, and Rod Blagojevich in Illinois.

25 posted on 11/12/2003 7:06:57 AM PST by tellw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
today (after California, Kentucky and Mississippi) there will be 29 GOP governors (five more Republicans than Democrats).

fuzzy math? isn't it 8 more?

26 posted on 11/12/2003 7:06:58 AM PST by petercooper (Proud member of the VRWC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
Don't for get that former N.Y. Mayor Ed Koch also will vote for GWB and says he's doing a fine job!
Danamco
27 posted on 11/12/2003 7:07:40 AM PST by danamco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: schu
My view has been for a long while the the Democrats have a dead philosophy (socialism) that everyone knows is headed towards the dustbin. The real argument is between libertarian and conservative thought, both of which hold promise.

But who in their right mind is going to believe the Democrat theory that raising taxes is good for the economy, killing babies is holy, and running from Iraq is in the national interest?

28 posted on 11/12/2003 7:10:21 AM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
I agree with your assessment. And further, I think that its completely possible for the majority of the black people in this country (that is, the 95% of blacks who consistently vote for Democrats regardless of any rhyme or reason) to create their own political party. Sort of like the way they have black student groups at colleges, black professional organizations, and their own BET television. This will finalize their own self-inflicted marginalization from American life, and provide the means for the Republicans to maintain political dominance for many years to come.
29 posted on 11/12/2003 7:19:42 AM PST by vanmorrison
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: randog
Another freeper suggested about a month ago that the real ideological debate will shift from liberalism vs. conservatism to libertarianism vs. conservatism. I don't know if this is wishful thinking on the part of a libertarian, but it seems to me like it could happen.

People often mistake me for a "Libtertarian." I'm barely even a small-l libertarian. I am a Constitutionalist. So, unless you have a death-grip on the Drug War, which I oppose for the damage it does to states' rights and to the Constitution, not for any libertarian ideology, conservatism and COnstitutionalism can get along just fine. If the Republicans take federalism seriously, and take undoing the New Deal seriously, I really won't care if legal pot happens tommorow or in 100 years.

30 posted on 11/12/2003 7:23:48 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
I wonder if the GOP could offer an olive branch of some power position to Sharpton in some way that would give him enough encouragement to run as an independent? I know it sounds looney, but it would destroy the Democrat party's chances now and possibly plant the seeds of a long term abandonment of the Dems by the black voters. I think once blacks started looking beyond the lies to the truth, they'd realize that the Dem party has been their enemy not their ally over the past 50 years.
31 posted on 11/12/2003 7:24:23 AM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eno_
Eno -- I'm with you, pal. Read my profile statement.

Republic
32 posted on 11/12/2003 7:28:10 AM PST by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: schu
Republicans are in a position to be the party in power, but they have significant opposition and problems to overcome, mainly the elitist media and leftist academia.

The media problem is now a limited problem due to Fox News cracking the leftist monopoly. Academe is only a weak force in politics.

The biggest danger to Republicans is massive vote fraud fueled by massive illegal immigration. This is costing us several Senate seats (the impact is less in any area smaller than a state).

33 posted on 11/12/2003 7:28:19 AM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite - it's almost worth defending)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
We need keep our heads up. The demonazicommiebabykillers are going get desparate and their union cronnies will be lock step with them..When a rat is in the corner what does it do? Fights back..I have a feeling it is going get ugly..
Hillary is the savior of these scum... Watch out the antichrist is here and she wears a pant suit!
34 posted on 11/12/2003 7:28:38 AM PST by DAPFE8900
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tellw
Their top state governors now are Jennifer Granholm in Michigan (who is constitutionally ineligible to run for President), Bill Richardson in NM, and Rod Blagojevich in Illinois.

Some have included Tom Vilsack (Iowa) and Ed Rendell (Pennsylvania) in the group of potential national candidates the Dems could draw from.

35 posted on 11/12/2003 7:31:24 AM PST by BlackRazor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
It am noticing this trend in local elections also, we have about 10% more registered Democrats than Republicans here, last Tuesday two Republicans were elected to the City Council, there are now 4 Republicans, and two Democrats on the Council, with a Republican Mayor who was elected two years ago.
36 posted on 11/12/2003 7:32:26 AM PST by c-b 1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BlackRazor
If Richardson is a rising Democrat start, they are in deep, deep trouble. He is a bag of wind that blows wherever the currents take him. As a "Friend of Bill", he showed he has no principles and is only interested in power, like most other Dems on the national stage.
37 posted on 11/12/2003 7:35:42 AM PST by Laserman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: FastCoyote
Yes, the product the Dems are pedaling has some serious flaws. ;-) But it is a mistake to underestimate them.

My thought is that the Dems will go down hard in 2004, losses at all levels. Implosion and fracturing of the party will follow (Greens, Traditional Dems, Unions, Government Worker Party, Commies, Socialists, Some Race Category, etc), hence no viable alternative to the Republicans will exist. We need to make some use of the potential new-found power.

38 posted on 11/12/2003 7:35:48 AM PST by schu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
BUMP-OLA!
39 posted on 11/12/2003 7:36:17 AM PST by jmstein7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GaryL
This all sounds good. We own the White House the Senate and the House. Then how come we cant get a judge appointed? I dont think we are as well off as one would think.
40 posted on 11/12/2003 7:38:41 AM PST by fish hawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson