Skip to comments.
N.C. Toll Plazas Could Be Down Road For I-95 Travelers
WRAL-TV - (Raleigh, NC) ^
Posted on 11/09/2003 5:06:28 PM PST by NCjim
Edited on 04/13/2004 2:55:54 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
State transportation officials said they need to start charging drivers who use Interstate 95, one of the most heavily traveled interstates on the East Coast.
Officials want to install six toll plazas along the interstate in North Carolina. Officials propose to charge $3 at each plaza, which means it could cost $18 to travel in North Carolina on I-95 from the Virginia border to South Carolina.
(Excerpt) Read more at wral.com ...
TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: Connecticut; US: Delaware; US: District of Columbia; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: Kentucky; US: Maryland; US: Massachusetts; US: New Jersey; US: New York; US: North Carolina; US: Rhode Island; US: South Carolina; US: Virginia; US: West Virginia
KEYWORDS: 95; endtolls; highways; i95; nc; newjersey; nj; northcarolina; regressivetax; taxation; taxes; tollplazas; tollroad; tollroads; tolls; turass; usagefee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: peteram
It would probably be good for them. They lost a lot of business when I-95 replaced US 301 as the primary north-south route. I can see US 301 traffic increasing for shorter trips but there is far too much stop and go to take it from Virginia to South Carolina.
21
posted on
11/09/2003 6:24:39 PM PST
by
NCjim
To: dwilli
Dumbest thing we ever did to take the tolls off of the R-P turnpike. It was a state money-machine, better than a hundred speed traps.
Locals bought token books for 1/6 of the price charged those just passing through.
But Richmond thought it was losing business to 295! LOL!
22
posted on
11/09/2003 6:25:03 PM PST
by
mrsmith
To: NCjim
It's not even funny anymore. Lived there for seven years myself. The price of land in 1990 vs the price of land less than 10 years later was ridiculous. Last time I checked half acre lots were going for $30,000 and up. And considering the 'fine' state of affairs in WNC as of late with all the mill closings, the locals can hardly find a good paying job anymore. So who do you think the land goes to?
Do you think these New Yorkers care? They've bought the houses, land, and whatever you do, don't head over past WCU. Cashiers and Highlands are just two toursit spots now stuck out in the middle of nowhere
23
posted on
11/09/2003 6:25:17 PM PST
by
billbears
(Deo Vindice)
To: Guillermo
Was that always the case? I guess I never noticed them because they stay on 95 to avoid the toll.
To: billbears
What kills me is what they are doing to the mountain tops. On I-40 once you get past Morganton, you can see how they've scalped the trees to give themselves a view. And you are right about the Cashiers/Highlands area. One big tourist trap!
I guess that Thomas Wolfe got it right when he said you can't go home again!
25
posted on
11/09/2003 6:29:37 PM PST
by
NCjim
To: ml/nj
I have been paying New Jersey Turnpike fees for years. I also pay in Maryland. North Carolina has as much right to have a toll on I-95 as NJ.
To: oldironsides
except they won't be exit tolls, they will be barrier tolls in NC on I95, causing traffic to be impeded just like on the garden state pkwy. the toll plazas on the GSP cause many deaths each year. anytime you introduce anything onto the road to cause everybody to stop, and then race to speed up again and gain "lane supremacy", accidents will rise significantly.
To: oldironsides
But it only costs around $4- $6 depending where you get off. $18 is big change.
That adds $36 to a round trip through NC, while I already stop there on to sleep at a hotel in Fayetteville, usually.
It think it is a losing proposition for NC. It would definately make it more likely for me to fly, and then they would lose my motel fee.
To: oceanview
NJ doesn't charge you $18 to drive the length of the state. I think they get about $5 or $6 on the Turnpike from end to end (120+ miles). North Carolina should be ashamed of themselves.....crooks.
29
posted on
11/09/2003 6:54:48 PM PST
by
XRdsRev
To: NCjim
They are now called "toll plazas?" Gads...or is it "Gag."
To: NCjim
"Just what we needed - more flat-landers!"Is it really true that all ya'll have one leg longer than than the other?
31
posted on
11/09/2003 7:00:10 PM PST
by
Hatteras
(Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps...)
To: NCjim
Interesting. I thought the Federal Gubbermint had control of the Interstate Hwys.
To: Hatteras
That would be the cows on the side of the mountain. :-)
We are best known for getting our corn from a jar.
33
posted on
11/09/2003 7:06:15 PM PST
by
NCjim
To: NCjim
Putting tolls at six places in the state is silly. Tolls are optimal if there are booths at the entrances/exits. And at the state line, make sure you've got a lot of booths.
I don't mind tolls. I mind traffic jams. Time is money (I'm an independent consultant, and my time on the highway is time not doint work for a client). Traffic jams cost me a lot more than tolls.
I say put tolls on the road to limit congestion. There's only a limited amount of highway space. In most cases, there are three lanes, and each lane can carry only a certain number of cars before there's a traffic jam. So to make tolls effective, the tolls have to vary by time of day. This way, you'll encourage people to drive at different times. In a sense, you put a market incentive in place to make people change their behavior. The government in effect rents out the highway, with different amounts for different times of day.
Movie theatres charges less for matinees. Why shouldn't highways be the same?
34
posted on
11/09/2003 7:08:12 PM PST
by
Koblenz
(There's usually a free market solution)
To: Koblenz
In a sense, you put a market incentive in place . . Don't expect a whole lot of FReepers to understand this concept, as simple as it is.
The responses so far on this thread are no doubt typical. We'd see similar comments over at DU, except they'd blame Bush or Elizabeth Dole. ("Toll Dole" -- can't you see it?)
As the number of people calling themselves conservatives increases, economic literacy seems to be declining almost in proportion.
To: NCjim
I haven't been on 301 in years. I wonder if the Horne's in Kenly is still there? Wonder if the girl that made the world's best milkshakes is still as pretty? Will the Enfield light still back up traffic all the way to Petersburg? :)
To: oldironsides
I have been paying New Jersey Turnpike fees for years. I also pay in Maryland. North Carolina has as much right to have a toll on I-95 as NJ. The NJ Tpk predates the Interstate Highway System, and I would guess the highways in Maryland do too. Such roads were not (originally) built with Federal funds. The people in Idaho paid for those roads in North Carolina, just as much as the people in North Carolina did. Are you going to send them a portion of the proceeds?
ML/NJ
37
posted on
11/10/2003 4:35:07 AM PST
by
ml/nj
To: Koblenz
Movie theatres charges less for matinees. Why shouldn't highways be the same?
Gasoline Tax Rates by State
|
|
State |
Tax/Cents per gallon |
State |
Tax/Cents per gallon |
Alabama |
18 |
Montana |
27 |
Alaska |
8 |
Nebraska |
24.6 |
Arizona |
18 |
Nevada |
24.75 |
Arkansas |
18.6 |
New Hampshire |
19.5 |
California |
18 |
New Jersey |
10.5 |
Colorado |
22 |
New Mexico |
18.875 |
Connecticut |
36 |
New York |
22.65 |
Delaware |
23 |
North Carolina |
22.3 |
Dist. of Columbia |
20 |
North Dakota |
20 |
Florida |
13 |
Ohio |
22 |
Georgia |
7.5 |
Oklahoma |
17 |
Hawaii |
16 |
Oregon |
24 |
Idaho |
25 |
Pennsylvania |
25.9 |
Illinois |
19 |
Rhode Island |
29 |
Indiana |
15 |
South Carolina |
16.0 |
Iowa |
20 |
South Dakota |
20 |
Kansas |
18 |
Tennessee |
20 |
Kentucky |
16.4 |
Texas |
20 |
Louisiana |
20 |
Utah |
24.5 |
Maine |
19 |
Vermont |
20 |
Maryland |
23.5 |
Virginia |
17.5 |
Massachusetts |
21 |
Washington |
23 |
Michigan |
19 |
West Virginia |
25.35 |
Minnesota |
20 |
Wisconsin |
23.8 |
Mississippi |
18.4 |
Wyoming |
9 |
Missouri |
17 |
Federal Tax Rate |
18.4 |
|
38
posted on
11/10/2003 4:51:34 AM PST
by
Grit
(Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
To: Koblenz
I say put tolls on the road to limit congestion. commerce.
This way, you'll encourage people to drive at different times.
Why do you drive when there are traffic jams?
In a sense, you put a market incentive in place to make people change their behavior.
That always works. :)
The government in effect rents out the highway, with different amounts for different times of day.
Take the gov't out of it, then you'll have a free market solution.
39
posted on
11/10/2003 4:58:35 AM PST
by
Grit
(Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
To: Grit
A few quick calculations:
Using Federal $0.184 /gal and NC $0.224 /gal travelling the 179.76 miles of I-95 costs : $3.05 (assuming 24 mpg)
$3.05 before tolls
$21.05 after tolls
40
posted on
11/10/2003 5:13:33 AM PST
by
Grit
(Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson