Skip to comments.
Insider shifts stance on removing Schiavo 's feeding tube
St Petersburg Times ^
| NOV 6, 2003
| MARY JO MELONE
Posted on 11/06/2003 11:41:15 AM PST by george wythe
On the crowded stage where the melodrama about Terri Schiavo is played, Richard Pearse Jr. had a smallish role.
The Clearwater lawyer served as Schiavo's guardian ad litem for a year, from the middle of 1998 to 1999. His job was to represent the young woman's interests in one of the hearings where Schiavo's husband sought removal of her feeding tube.
Pearse investigated her case. He interviewed her relatives. He read the medical records.
Then, in December 1998, he recommended to the judge that the feeding tube remain.
His reasons have become familiar to us all:
Terri Schiavo's own wishes were unclear.
Her husband had a substantial conflict of interest, Pearse said. If the tube were removed and she died, Michael Schiavo stood to inherit $700,000 left over from a malpractice settlement. Pearse also was troubled by Schiavo's conduct. He had stopped trying to get therapy for his wife after the money came through, Pearse said.
Pearse also noted that Terri Schiavo's parents, Bob and Mary Schindler, had a potential conflict. If Michael divorced his wife and the Schindlers took over her care, they would stand to inherit the $700,000.
Pearse's recommendations went into the thick file of the Schiavo case. January 2000 brought a weeklong trial. When it ended, Pinellas Circuit Judge George Greer drew other conclusions. Terri Schiavo was in a persistent vegetative state, he said. There was no doubt of that. Her feeding tube could be removed.
I went back to Pearse earlier this week because the feeding tube is still the issue of the hour. The intervention of the governor and Legislature saw to that.
I wanted to test the strength of my own opinions. Was I wrong to side with Michael Schiavo?
Was I missing something more clear to somebody on the inside of the case, like Pearse?
Well, yes, I was. I didn't know that Pearse's views had changed since 1998. He no longer opposes the removal of Terri Schiavo's feeding tube.
Here's why:
Most of the medical testimony, given at trial and after Pearse issued his recommendations, concluded she would never recover.
The primary reason for Michael Schiavo's conflict of interest is gone. Only about $50,000 of the original $700,000 settlement remains. The rest reportedly went to Terri Schiavo's care and legal fees.
The case itself has been closely scrutinized by judge after judge, and their findings have been unanimous. The judges thought they knew what Terri Schiavo would have wanted.
They also found Michael Schiavo credible. Even with a conflict of interest, Pearse said, he could be right about his wife's wishes.
One day, this all must stop.
Pearse has a word for what is needed.
Finality.
That's what courts are supposed to provide, Pearse said. They are supposed to sort through our biggest disputes and put them to rest.
Once the governor and Legislature stepped in and pushed through Terri's Law, the courts were denied their usual role.
Pearse called the law stunningly bad policy.
Note to the GOP: Pearse is a Republican.
He predicted, as others have, that Terri's Law will be struck down as unconstitutional, a case of unequal protection under the law. The concept means that it's illegal to give Terri Schiavo a right that others don't get. Terri's Law was written to cover her situation and hers alone.
The fight now is on two fronts.
In one court case, Michael Schiavo mounts a challenge to Terri's Law, before Pinellas Circuit Judge W. Douglas Baird.
The other battle is before Judge Greer, as it has been for years. Terri Schiavo's parents are asking, as they have repeatedly, for the ouster of Michael Schiavo as his wife's guardian. Like Pearse, the rest of us can only watch.
- You can reach Mary Jo Melone at mjmelone@sptimes.com or 813 226-3402.
TOPICS: Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
The above editorial was written by MARY JO MELONE
To: george wythe
M. Shiavo still has a conflict of interest that isn't mentioned.
1. He has a child and another on the way by a woman he wants to marry as soon as his wife dies.
2. There are questions about the nature of her "accident" that left her in this state.
Why doesn't he just divorce Terri? Perhaps "love." Perhaps "money." Perhaps "personal safety."
2
posted on
11/06/2003 11:48:22 AM PST
by
xzins
(Proud to be Army!)
To: george wythe
What is it with these people? They have some kind of sick need to see this woman dead. And they're lining up Dem politicians (fresh from the latest abortion-rights rally) to help them pull out her feeding tube. This is beyond disgusting.
3
posted on
11/06/2003 11:52:33 AM PST
by
madprof98
To: xzins
Some posters have wondered why the Schindlers did not recommend Pearse as guardian to Judge Demers last week.
Pearse had been the only Guardian Ad Litem previously approved by a court to serve Terri Schiavo's interests.
Now we know why.
Judge Demers appointed a medical professor and lawyer, Jay Wolfson, as a new guardian for Terri Schiavo.
To: george wythe
This is all well and good, except for the other issues.
Michael claims repeatedly, there is no insurance policy on Terri.
Michael live-in girlfriend, who he was having an affair with before Terri's 'injury', has her own, run from the house, INSURANCE COMPANY. Coincidence?
Michael claims that since there were no bruises detected by doctors at the emergency room (who, btw, weren't looking for bruises), that he didn't choke her until she was unconscious. Notice how he is so specific. First, a pillow over the mouth does the same thing, with no bruises, and there are other ways to choke you until you are unconcious.
His abandonment of therapy and general care for Terri say more than any words he could utter.
5
posted on
11/06/2003 12:09:31 PM PST
by
UCANSEE2
("Duty is ours, Results are God's" --John Quincy Adams)
To: george wythe
Posts here will now claim that Pearse has been "bought off" by Schiavo and has joined the "conspiracy" whose tentacles seem to expand every day
6
posted on
11/06/2003 12:10:59 PM PST
by
WackyKat
To: UCANSEE2
>>there are other ways to choke you until you are unconcious.
For example, if you're a hundred pounds heavier, sitting on the chest for a few minutes should do it.
To: george wythe
The case itself has been closely scrutinized by judge after judge, and their findings have been unanimous. The judges thought they knew what Terri Schiavo would have wanted. Sigh; yet another distortion by the ghouls. All factfinding happened in front of ONE judge: Mr. (3-divorces) Greer. The wall that the imperial court system has set up to prevent appellate impact upon such matters is next to absolute. The court of last resort was called upon: the legislature and the governor. They came through with flying colors.
8
posted on
11/06/2003 12:28:13 PM PST
by
drlevy88
To: george wythe
Finality.<p.Who wants to pull the trigger?
9
posted on
11/06/2003 12:29:54 PM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
To: george wythe
Mary Jo is at it again. Does she really think we don't know who her good buddies are?
Does she really think we don't know that she is so far left of left that her own right hand can't keep up?
Nov. 15 2000,
Ms. Melone begins her attacks on Kathleen Harris:The greatest crisis in the modern history of America is being decided by a millionaire afraid to come out of the woodwork, your secretary of state, Katherine Harris. Harris has rarely been seen in public since shortly after Florida's heart-stopping presidential election returns last Tuesday.
A whole week.
The governor had necessarily taken himself out of the picture.
The job of leading the state through these extraordinary days naturally then fell to Harris, wherever she was.
Then she added he two cents again on Nov. 26:The Republicans don't like the recounting in the Democratic country of South Florida, where Gore wants even ballots a computer would reject counted. So the GOP sues. The Democrats are enraged at the tinkering with absentee ballots carried out by the GOP in Republican-rich Seminole County, that made incomplete ballots complete. So the Democrats sue.
Each side hails a court decision in their favor as the greatest document since the Federalist Papers. When they lose, they holler that the life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness among even those of us with so little pull we spend Saturday nights in the Laundromat is in grave danger.
Then the Republicans run wailing from Tallahassee to Washington.
We know how she feels about Jeb Bush and abortion: May 18, 2003
There could be reasonable ways to handle this problem, but Jeb Bush had other ideas. The governor stuck his nose in the middle of things and asked that a guardian be named for the fetus - a direct challenge to state law, which holds a fetus is not a person and thus in no need of a guardian.
Bush's position puts him squarely, banners flying, in the front of the pro-life crusade. The idea that a fetus is a person is the fundamental platform of the anti-abortion campaign. And it's what makes this story national news.
The problem is, the story focuses on the wrong element, the needs of the fetus.
We aren't hearing a peep about the woman.
You forgot to issue the BARF alert.
To: george wythe
Sick, Sick, Sick thinking, Of course, since there is no longer a money issue, do away with the life, would seem to be the only conclusion.
These people are monsters. Terri's life has dignity whether or not she moves again or not. God should decide when the life should end, not the end of her financial assets.
11
posted on
11/06/2003 2:07:04 PM PST
by
Smocker
To: TaxRelief
Thanks for showing where she is coming from (ie the LEFT).
12
posted on
11/06/2003 2:32:38 PM PST
by
WOSG
(I SUPPORT COLONEL WEST.)
To: george wythe
"One day, this all must stop. Pearse has a word for what is needed. Finality."
oh really? Why not let it stop upon her natural death?
Why starve a human being to death? There is not any need or reason to kill this woman except a love
of death over life.
13
posted on
11/06/2003 2:35:01 PM PST
by
WOSG
(I SUPPORT COLONEL WEST.)
To: george wythe
Note to the GOP: Pearse is a Republican. Note to Mary Jo:
So what? He's no conservative. Pearse is what is called a RINO.
14
posted on
11/06/2003 2:38:44 PM PST
by
Bloody Sam Roberts
(Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.)
To: george wythe
If the numbers are correct, the money will all have been spent on her care in another year.
Who is going to pay the 50 grand a year needed for her care after that?
You and I are if we don't get her put down quickly.
More government waste and more taxes.
So9
15
posted on
11/06/2003 2:48:58 PM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(Real Texicans; we're grizzled, we're grumpy and we're armed)
To: drlevy88
Mr. (3-divorces) Greer and what does this have to do with the case..... Sheesh
To: george wythe; TaxRelief
1...Cannot trust anything Mary Jo Melone has to say about this case. She has no credibility with the facts IMO.
2...Key Schindler Group people in Terris Case should still contact Attorney Pearse. However, he still may not help as he has other issues here, but worth the effort. Pearse had many other comments in his GAL Affidavit regarding Michael, other than the $700k money issue. Most newer people to this Case have never read his full ten page GAL Affadavit.
Pearse is probably not aware of the recent facts involving how Michael utilized this money. I/we, well understand the legal loopholes that Michael-Felos-Greer are utilizing to use Terris Trust money to pay legal fees. I/we/our attorneys still think it is illegal, and a violation of the Malpractice Settlement Agreement and the responding Trust Agreement. I have included Attorney Pearses public available information as attached below for anyone interested.
3...Regarding Attorney Pearses comments in Mary Jos current article - The Inside Skinny:
I live in Miami and understanding Florida laws and backwoods politics very well. See my FR personal profile for more info, if this is your pleasure. No disrespect intended, but many FR posters on the Terri Schiavo Case do not understand the many extreme complexities and backwoods politics involved here and accordingly they reach erroneous and/or emotionally driven conclusions. Again not trying to be demeaning, this is just one of the most complex Cases, overall, I have seen in almost thirty years. This Case has broad reaching ramifications that affects the entire County, our U.S. Healthcare policies in this matter, the positions of the American Medical Association, and the positions of the Florida Department of Health.
Florida Powers didnt want this Terri Schiavo Case to spill into the National media spotlight. They tried everything possible to sweep this deal under the carpet and even Washington was involved. Most people have no idea how close the Powers came to being successful in sweeping Terris demise under the carpet and shrugging their shoulders, saying we did all we could. However, through a lot of hard work, and Gods grace, Terris Law got passed. Once again, trust me, you have no idea how close Terris Bill/Law came to be defeated, and if the Terris Right-To-Life Movement had to do it again next week, we would not be successful this time.
NOTE:-Its interesting all the organizations around the U.S. taking credit for making Terris Law a reality. Yet I have not seen one forum post, or a National or Local media article, on the one organization who really put that Terris Bill over the top. Without that ONE organization, Terris Bill would have never happened, much less become Law. (No, I am not taking about us, we dont have that kind of horsepower, never will)
It is a 99% foregone conclusion, by the Floridian heavy weights in the know that Terris Law will be struck down by the Florida Courts. There are many valid reasons for this that I will not delineate in this particular post. This still doesnt mean it is going to happen, but the odds highly favor it. The Floridian old-line Judges, the Florida Bar Association, the Clearwater Bar Association, and others want Terris Law nullified for a political message to certain people. Also Florida has the most liberal Supreme Court in the County, and some of the most strict-liberal Right-To-Privacy and Right-To-Die laws in the Country. Why do you think that the National Right-To-Die maggots(IMO) picked this Schiavo Case as a National Test Case. It wasnt an accident or because they like fresh orange juice.
I/we have seen many people like Attorney Pearse, change their public, but not private, opinion on the Terri Schiavo Case since Terris Law was signed by Governor Bush. I am not questioning this attorneys credibility whatsoever. I am just stating that unfortunately they are much bigger forces/currents involved here that just Terris Life or Death Interest. Its a very sad fact, but nevertheless a fact. I wish some people could wake up before its too late....it's getting very old.
Interesting, Attorney Pearse, made a different statement in the press on this subject, just four weeks ago...of course the "trade winds" changed.
These larger agendas create great danger to the lesser informed......
Attachment I
Florida Bar Attorney Profile - OnLine Public Information
Richard Lee Pearse Jr
FBA 282723
Member in Good Standing
1239 S Myrtle Ave
Clearwater Florida 33756-3469
Phone: 727/462-9009
Fax: 727/449-2205
E-Mail:
rlp@pearse.net County: Pinellas
Circuit: 06
Admitted: 10/22/1979
Board Certification:
Elder Law, General Practice Solo and Small Firm, Real Property Probate and Trust Law, Trial Lawyers Members in Good Standing.
17
posted on
11/06/2003 3:26:34 PM PST
by
saveterri1
(Terri’s Fight, It’s a "Blood War" * Mikey-Felos & Co.–They're Goin Down!!!)
To: Servant of the 9
There is lots of money.
To: george wythe
My first wife was in a coma and on a ventilator when she died. Pulling the plug on that ventilator would have
allowed her to die naturally. The doctors were pushing me to let them pull the plug. Fortunately I didn't have to make that decision; she died while still on the machine.
Terri's case is different. She's not dying. She just needs nourishment. Removing the feeding tube would cause her death.
Causing someone's death is totally different from allowing someone to die naturally. I've been there and I know the difference.
To: TaxRelief
There is lots of money. If 650,000 of the 700,000 has been expended, just where is there lots of money except in my pocket?
So9
20
posted on
11/06/2003 4:50:44 PM PST
by
Servant of the 9
(Think of it as Evolution In Action)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson