Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Marketing Outrage: How Miramax uses prejudice to sell its product
Catholic World Report ^ | 11/01/03 | John Herreid

Posted on 11/03/2003 4:16:06 PM PST by jrherreid

Marketing Outrage
How Miramax uses prejudice to sell its product
By John Herreid

The phone rang, and I picked it up.

“Hello. This is Lori Johnson from Miramax. Is this Ignatius Press?”

“Yes.”

“Good! Can I talk to you about a movie we have showing in your area? It’s a really beautiful film about faith and Catholic culture in Ireland.”

“Ok.”

“We can send you passes to a press screening of the film. It’s about a convent of nuns in the 1960’s…”

“What’s the name?”

“The Magdalene Sisters.”

STARK THEMES

A quick online search showed that The Magdalene Sisters is a movie directed by Peter Mullan, a self-professed Marxist. After opening to critical acclaim in England it has been picked up for distribution in the United States by Miramax, a division of Disney. It garnered the Golden Lion award for best film at the Venice Film Festival in 2002. A few more clicks and I read that the movie had been “condemned” by the Vatican for its depiction of religious life. From what I had heard from the woman on the phone, it seemed that the last distinction was what Miramax was after: nothing sells like controversy.

I attended the press screening with a friend. We filed into the theater, a hip San Francisco spot known for showing independent movies, especially ones with gay/lesbian themes. We sat down and the movie began.

The Magdalene Sisters, set in the 1960’s, depicts the Magdalene laundries in Ireland where fallen women were sent to work. The opening of the film shows a wall with names, looking much like the Vietnam Memorial in Washington, DC. “Brigid… Therese… Mary… Charlotte…” is the background upon which the words “BASED ON TRUE EVENTS” are superimposed. Subtle.

We see three girls. One is raped at a wedding. When she tells her sister about it, she is promptly sent away. “Where is Margaret goin’?” her young brother cries. No answer.

The second girl has just given birth to an illegitimate child. A priest arrives at the hospital and bullies her into giving the baby away. The sorrowful mother is led away to the laundries.

The third girl is an orphan. A pretty teenager, she flirts with some boys through the iron fence of the orphanage. Branded a temptress, she is also hustled away to the workhouse.

The director, Peter Mullan, is outraged. And he makes damned sure everyone else is, too.

The remainder of the film is designed to provoke gasps of horror, sighs of sympathy, and cries of rage. The mother superior, played by Geraldine McEwan, seems to have been based on equal parts Squeers from Nicholas Nickleby and Scrooge McDuck. Her day consists of beating girls with canes, belts, and whatnot, and cackling over the hoards of money brought in from their work. The camera lingers over the crisp paper notes as the nun lovingly packs them away in cookie tins.

The other nuns range from sadistic to sadistic. Scenes in the movie show them feasting on sausages and bacon as the girls eat colorless gruel, and forcing the girls to strip and parade for them as the nuns make cruel jibes about their bodies. The three priests portrayed aren’t any better. Two are cruel monsters who have a puritanical zeal to rival any 19th century Calvinist, and the third a sexual pervert who preys on a simple-minded girl at the laundry. When the girl finally accuses him, shouting “You’re not a man of God!”, she is hauled away to the insane asylum.

REDEEMING SPIRITUAL VALUE?

Movie critic James Bowman, in giving a negative review of the film, said: “Was there among them not the faintest whiff of sanctity, nor a single soul to protest at the scandalous treatment of the girls? To believe that there was not, you would have to be quite as naïve as someone who believed that such things as this film represents never happened at all. But the anti-religious sensibility in our time always tends to overstate its case—perhaps because at some level it must know what a powerful force for good it is trying to portray as unremittingly bad.”

The audience reaction was something to behold. Everyone was deeply moved; a movie critic behind me murmured “What a powerful film!” as I got up to leave. It appeared that no one seemed to mind that there was no alternative provided to counterbalance the evil nuns in the movie. No committed Catholic is shown to be anything less than a sadist, and the conclusion Peter Mullan has come to is that the horror of the laundries is something that is not just natural, but essential to the Catholic faith.

A comparison, which has been made many times by Catholic conservatives, is that no one would dare make such a movie about Muslims or Jews. True, but it misses a point. Jews and Muslims do not have a large number who claim to be Muslim or Jew but deride anything traditional about those religions. The Catholics most influential to the media in this country would like nothing more than to see the Vatican’s authority demolished. Their social perspective on such products as The Magdalene Sisters is naturally going to be skewed in favor of the anti-Catholic. This makes it possible for such films or books to be created without widespread condemnation from the American Catholic elite.

CYNICAL MARKETING

What is especially reprehensible about this film is not the film itself, but the way it has been marketed. The original poster reads, “Based on true events”. Good enough, but the trailer says in a dramatic voice-over “The true story of three courageous women…” which is an out-and-out falsehood. As Mullan explained in an interview, he didn’t do any research in writing and directing this film other than watching a BBC documentary about the Magdalene laundries. Furthermore, Miramax specifically approached traditionally minded Catholic publications, attempting to shock and outrage them by presenting the movie as a “heartwarming story of faith”. Here in San Francisco, Miramax handed out free passes for a screening of the film by taking out ads in local newspapers. To qualify for the free tickets, you had to answer a series of questions correctly—questions that would be known primarily by devout Catholics, such as biographical information about saints, trivia about Church dogma, etc. It seems Miramax wanted not just a campaign of outrage from the orthodox Catholic media, but a word-of-mouth condemnation as well.

And it has worked. William Donohue of the Catholic League played into the Miramax trap, ending up having his organization being quoted in an embarrassingly naïve statement as “a spokesman for the U.S.-based Catholic League quickly defended the asylums as appropriate to the social standards of their day” (SF Weekly, July 30th). Other Catholic groups will surely follow, and build up a storm of controversy that will only lead more people to see the film. It’s genius really, and it’s a marketing move that only works when you exploit Catholics. This campaign leaves orthodox Catholics between a rock and a hard place. Either condemn something that you know is wrong and thereby provide more publicity for it, or remain silent and let it get a free pass.

Companies like Miramax know this, which makes their marketing of outrage a sure thing —a strategy that they can utilize time and again. Don’t bother trying to shame them out of it—as everyone knows; Hollywood lost its sense of shame as soon as it could walk.

This article appeared in the November 2003 issue of The Catholic World Report


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; US: California
KEYWORDS: magdalenesisters; moviereview
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
Article from the latest issue of CWR, first time being published by them!
1 posted on 11/03/2003 4:16:07 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
The latest marketing technique is "stelth word of mouth" marketing. You send paid employee to areas with people to talk up a product. So you would send a person to a bar to talk up a new cigarette line. You pay people to go onto chat rooms and talk up a movie.
2 posted on 11/03/2003 4:28:42 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Ping!
3 posted on 11/03/2003 4:30:18 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
“Hello. This is Lori Johnson from Miramax. Is this Ignatius Press?”

“Good! Can I talk to you about a movie we have showing in your area? It’s a really beautiful film about faith and Catholic culture in Ireland.”

You have got to be kidding!

4 posted on 11/03/2003 4:32:34 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
No joke.
5 posted on 11/03/2003 4:34:57 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
Was it chutzpah or ignorance on their part? What did you say to her?
6 posted on 11/03/2003 4:36:48 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah; Desdemona; NYer; Salvation; As you well know...; BlackElk
ping
7 posted on 11/03/2003 4:37:33 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
You saw 60 Minutes as well...

Nothing wrong with paying people to talk up your product, IMO.

By the way, have you tried Vanilla Pepsi? It's pretty darn good!
8 posted on 11/03/2003 4:41:23 PM PST by Guillermo (Go 'Dawgs, Sic 'Em!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Chutzpah, I think. Probably what they were being given as a script to read off to people they were calling. The woman who talked with me also wanted the phone number for the San Francisco Faith, which is a conservative Catholic paper here in town. Probably was calling all of the known conservative papers in the area.
9 posted on 11/03/2003 4:46:48 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
. True, but it misses a point. Jews and Muslims do not have a large number who claim to be Muslim or Jew but deride anything traditional about those religions.
Huh?!
Try the entire Reconstructionist branch, as well as most liberal Jews! They have utter contempt for current Hasidim or ultra-Orthodox.
10 posted on 11/03/2003 5:05:19 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
BOYCOTT DISNEY: a vortex of seductive evil™
11 posted on 11/03/2003 5:09:37 PM PST by Petronski (Living life in a minor key.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
Try the entire Reconstructionist branch, as well as most liberal Jews! They have utter contempt for current Hasidim or ultra-Orthodox.

Yes, but if you made a movie that attacked observant Jews, most of these liberal Jews would complain. They don't follow the traditions of their forefathers, but they do respect them. I.e. Speilberg, Dershowitz, Lieberman.

12 posted on 11/03/2003 5:19:35 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rmlew
And, also, the most influential Jews in the US are more moderate on those things, and would violently boycott anything that even hinted at anti-Semitism. Whereas the most influential (to the media) Catholics in the US will bend over backwards to accomodate those who wish to destroy the traditions of the Church.
13 posted on 11/03/2003 5:22:06 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
yes, that show O.C. send mailers of the first two episodes on DVDs to 20,000 teens or something, to create "buzz" Now the female teen lead is topless in a rock video (17 years old) it has gone from aint it cool news to hiring marketing firms to plant blog entries about hot properties etc.

they even monitor the illegal downloads of MP3 to see which songs are hot, and if they should do marketing campaigns in certain markets.
14 posted on 11/03/2003 5:54:28 PM PST by BurbankKarl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
Nice article. Congratulations on your CWR publishing. Are you signing autographs now that you're famous? ;-)
15 posted on 11/03/2003 6:02:51 PM PST by Canticle_of_Deborah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
Did you save her the quarter?
16 posted on 11/03/2003 6:19:25 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
The woman who talked with me also wanted the phone number for the San Francisco Faith

Since they called you first, you got to write the article!

17 posted on 11/03/2003 6:20:45 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
The influential liberal Jews were silent during the Crown Heights riots. A few rememberd their voices only after those on the right made trouble against the Dinkins Administration.

I will never forget Mark Green saying of the Hasidim, "They are not my kind of Jews."

18 posted on 11/03/2003 7:49:19 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
William Donahue should have said the laundries were abhorrent and in essene the content of the film is true BUT from the sound of this film, I find it hard to believe that there was not one catholic that didn't feel for these girls. I have that same feeling whenever I hear people review movies about the holocaust.

Either way, the article was good and glad they got outed on the way they market movies. Personally I tend to stay away from films like this. I don't need to be depressed.
19 posted on 11/03/2003 9:44:16 PM PST by cyborg (Kyk nou, die ding wat jy soek issie hierie sienj)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid; Yehuda; Nachum; yonif
Please. Last year there was a movie about Gay Orthodox Jews, "Trembling Before G-d,". It was an attempt to claim that Orthodox Jews are uncompasionate hypocrites.
Liberal Jews made it, produced it, and distributed it. Speilberg funded the project.
http://www.jewishaz.com/jewishnews/020201/film.shtml

Tikkun gave it a positive review.

<a href="http://www.momentmag.com/archive/apr01/feat1.html>Moment</a> gave it a positive review.<P>

20 posted on 11/03/2003 10:59:44 PM PST by rmlew (Peaceniks and isolationists are objectively pro-Terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson