This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.
|
Locked on 01/26/2004 2:00:53 PM PST by Admin Moderator, reason:
The size of this thread is causing FR to slow down whenever it is accessed. It is going to be locked and moved to the chat/general interest forum. If anyone wants to post a ‘Part 2’ thread, go ahead, but post it to chat. Thank You http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1065689/posts
|
Skip to comments.
Al Qaeda again threatens New York, Washington and Los Angeles - Daily Terror Threat
Debka ^
| 11-3-2003
| Staff
Posted on 11/03/2003 9:17:27 AM PST by tubavil
Edited on 01/26/2004 3:58:09 PM PST by Sidebar Moderator.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 9,581-9,600, 9,601-9,620, 9,621-9,640 ... 15,461-15,468 next last
To: tmp02
It is possible that is exactly what the EOM post wants folks to think about.
To: jstolzen
Somebody tole me so. :) Hearsay, but she should know. I asked her over the weekend and she said yes, they were at orange.
To: tubavil
9,603
posted on
01/12/2004 4:52:15 PM PST
by
eleni121
(Preempt and Prevent)
To: ladyjane
he US government yesterday lowered the national terrorism threat level from "high," or orange, to "elevated," or yellow, except for four cities and at sites in critical industries, such as airports and nuclear facilities.
The Department of Homeland Security kept the cities of New York, Los Angeles, Las Vegas, and Washington on high alert. In Massachusetts, public safety officials said the state will maintain security at or near the orange level at Logan Airport and energy sector facilities in the state but decrease the attention at other locations.
It was the first time since the inception of the color-coded advisory system that the general threat level was lowered while specific geographic and industrial sites were kept on higher alert. Previously, the alert was lowered nationwide.
The terror level was raised to the system's second-highest level Dec. 21, when Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge warned that intelligence reports indicated the threat of holiday attacks was greater than at any time since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks. It was the fifth time that the terror alert level has been raised from "elevated" to "high" since system was created in March 2002.
"With the passing of the holidays and many large gatherings that certainly occur during this time, we have made the decision to come down to yellow," Ridge said. "Yellow still means that we are [at] an elevated risk of attack. And we will maintain particular vigilance around some critical resources and locales."
The repeated adjustments to the national alert level have engendered criticism from security specialists that the alert system is ineffective -- raising public fears, they say, while wasting money to broadly ramp up security. During the most recent period of heightened alert, the US government relayed news of potential threats to airlines, causing the delay or cancellation of several international flights to the United States. Ridge said he did not know whether any specific plots were foiled.
He said airlines will remain at a higher state of alert, but cited security concerns in declining to specify which other sectors will do so. "We don't want to broadcast to everybody where we're going to be doing this," he said.
Certain airports will continue to have increased security, an unnamed Homeland Security official told the Associated Press. A few of the many hundreds of dams, bridges, and chemical plants that received heightened protection during the higher alert will continue to be treated with extra vigilance, the official said.
Nuclear facilities and ports also are expected to maintain higher vigilance.
9,604
posted on
01/12/2004 4:54:16 PM PST
by
tapatio
(I would rather see the United States respected than loved by other nations)
To: jstolzen
I don't think it's the whole city. My friend wasn't specific, but gave me reason to think it was selective.
To: JustPiper
".....we need to pray for the other countries that are under threat and especially for Israel, who it is a way of life for!"
__________________________________________________________
I agree. We must remember that we are not alone in this fight against terrorism. Israel lives with these threats every day.
To: All
http://www.usdoj.gov/opa/pr/2004/January/04_ag_012.htm "FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE"
MONDAY, JANUARY 12, 2004
WWW.USDOJ.GOV
AG
(202) 514-2007
TDD (202) 514-1888
"STATEMENT OF ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT
REGARDING THE SUPREME COURTS DECISION NOT TO HEAR
CENTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY STUDIES V. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE:"
"Time and time again, the courts have upheld the careful steps the Justice Department and federal government have taken since the devastating attacks of September 11, 2001 to both investigate that atrocity and prevent terrorists from striking again. The Supreme Court decision keeps in place the D.C. Circuit's decision upholding the Justice Departments measured steps to safeguard sensitive information about our terrorism investigations as well as the privacy of individuals who chose not to make public their link to the probe. When the September 11 investigation led us to those who had violated our nations laws, we enforced those laws and detained those individuals. We are pleased the court let stand a decision that clearly outlined the danger of giving terrorists a virtual roadmap to our investigation that could have allowed them to chart a potentially deadly detour around our efforts.
ADDITIONAL BACKGROUND INFORMATION:
In approving the governments lawful, measured steps in the war on terrorism, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals wrote on June 17, 2003, "America faces an enemy just as real as its former Cold War foes, with capabilities beyond the capacity of the judiciary to explore.... we hold that the governments expectation that disclosure of the detainees names would enable al Qaeda or other terrorist groups to map the course of the investigation and thus develop the means to impede it is reasonable. A complete list of names informing terrorists of every suspect detained by the government at any point during the September 11 investigation would give terrorist organizations a composite picture of the government investigation, and since these organizations would generally know the activities and locations of its members on or about September 11, disclosure would inform terrorists of both the substantive and geographic focus of the investigation. Moreover, disclosure would inform terrorists which of their members were compromised by the investigation, and which were not. This information could allow terrorists to better evade the ongoing investigation and more easily formulate or revise counter-efforts.
The court continued, Knowing when and where each individual was arrested would provide a chronological and geographical picture of the government investigation. Terrorists could learn from this information not only where the government focused its investigation but how that investigation progressed step by step. Armed with that knowledge, they could then reach such conclusions as, for example, which cells had been compromised, and which individuals had been cooperative with the United States. They might well be able to derive conclusions as to how more adequately secure their clandestine operations in future terrorist undertakings."
###
04-012
9,607
posted on
01/12/2004 5:04:34 PM PST
by
Cindy
To: mhking
"This is really getting muddy at best."
Got to read between the lions.
To: Calpernia
Thank you for all your work you are putting into this thread. You and some others have kept me riveted for weeks.
To: JustPiper
"Me too, I kept my admiration for Condi on my homepage here ;)"
____________________________________________________
I love Condi, also. She is such a positive role model for women. She is highly intelligent with quite an impressive record.
To: Domestic Church
ROFLOL.
To: Domestic Church
Read between the lions...
Even I got that! (grin)
9,612
posted on
01/12/2004 5:13:26 PM PST
by
Cindy
To: tmp02
While EOM may be fake, isn't the Supper Bowl in Houston on the 1 of Feb. 2004?
Don't Mess With Texas
9,613
posted on
01/12/2004 5:19:35 PM PST
by
TexKat
(Just because you did not see it or read it, that does not mean it did or did not happen.)
To: Letitring; All
Some interesting little tidbits from Cunards website:
Cunard Lines spectacular Queen Mary 2 left Southampton today at around 6:30 pm (local time) on her Maiden Voyage amid fireworks, cheering well wishers and fireboats spewing water into the sky. The 14-day voyage to North America will call at Madeira, Tenerife and Las Palmas in the Canary Islands and Barbados and St. Thomas in the Caribbean before arriving at Fort Lauderdale, Florida, on January 26.
When will QM2 and QE2 be in Southampton at the same time? QM2 and QE2 will arrive together from New York on 1 May 2004. Both are scheduled to berth at 0700 hrs.
Baggage in advance and collection arrangements Guests can now make arrangements to have White Star Luggage Service transport their luggage between their home and the ship or any pre- or post-land destination. This service is provided by DHL Worldwide Express and is available exclusively for the personal luggage of cruise guests. Standard orders must be placed at least 14 days prior to saling. Expedited Services can be acquired within 14 days of sailing at additional cost, and are subject to availability. For more information and rates, please call 1-888-491-0774. Additional terms and conditions apply.
9,614
posted on
01/12/2004 5:19:43 PM PST
by
WestCoastGal
("Hire paranoids, they may have a high false alarm rate, but they discover all the plots" Rumsfeld)
To: WestCoastGal
Isn't it something? Awesome sight. Fox news has shown her from time to time, today.
To: Cindy
Wasn't there a post on dead farm animals, upstream somewhere, recently?
To: Letitring
Nevermind. It was from wolves. Shessh.
.
To: nw_arizona_granny
I couldn't get the link to work, so I looked for an original article. If anyone is interested in reading about the missing plutonium at Sellafield (UK):
http://www.sundayherald.com/38953
To: Calpernia
Great links on 9595!!! It might have been the owner of that Russian TV network who was the target in Great Britain...for some reason I think he also had some publishing sidelines as well.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 9,581-9,600, 9,601-9,620, 9,621-9,640 ... 15,461-15,468 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson