Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Relationships Between Republicans And Conservatives (Cathryn Crawford)
Washington Dispatch ^ | October 31, 2003 | Cathryn Crawford

Posted on 10/31/2003 8:00:17 AM PST by Scenic Sounds

Does a Republican equal a conservative? There is an entire spectrum of beliefs embodied within those elected officials that have an (R) after their name, and most of us assume that if someone is a Republican, they are conservative. However, political parties die when they are stagnant, and so there is constant change.

To answer the conservativism question, first we have to know what the basic beliefs of conservatives really are.

Historically, their most common belief – the one issue that typically unites them – is a belief in a limited federal government. Conservatives in American tend to believe that power is best left to state and local governments – the governments that are closest to the people. They believe that these smaller governments know better what their own communities need than the more distant federal government.

Conservatives also believe that the government should have a limited fiscal policy, and that the economy runs better with as little government interference as possible. We believe that most government regulations on economic issues serve to stunt growth, and that the capitalist system works best when it is allowed to work as freely as is possible.

Conservatives believe in the rights of the individuals over the rights of the government. They also deeply believe in the idea of personal responsibility. They believe that with individual rights comes individual responsibility. With a limited government comes a limited amount of assistance for its citizens, and conservatives embrace this, because it encourages individuality and freedom from dependence.

Conservatives believe in a strong national defense, and they tend to believe that our borders should be tightly controlled. They support the military and tend to believe that our military is not well served when it is spread all over the world on peacekeeping missions.

These make up the core of conservative values. While there is room for argument within any of these, they are the foundational tenets.

Now, let’s get back to our original question. Does a Republican equal a conservative? There isn’t a simple answer, but the most obvious one is no. There is no Republican that can say that he has held to these values without fail. The problem occurs when the leaders within the Party stop making conservative values their goal.

When the foundation of a belief system is taken away, the entire system wobbles. When one tenet is taken away, the rest threaten to crumble. If Republicans cease to believe in the idea of a limited central government, it becomes easier to justify more regulation and restriction on our market system. When our troops become less of a defense force and more of a peacekeeping force, it becomes easier to justify spreading them out from country to country, which tires and stresses our military. When personal responsibility stops – anything can happen. If no one is to blame, then no one must fear consequences of what they do.

Perhaps the question really is – Should a Republican equal a conservative? For those of us that believe in the GOP, that answer is a resounding yes – but this question will be answered by the people, over a period of decades, who will give their money and their votes to the Republican Party. As the GOP moves closer to the center, there will be a day when conservatives must decide whether the Republican Party is still the party that represents them best; and if they conclude that it is not, they will have to find an alternative.

Cathryn Crawford is a student at the University of Texas.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Philosophy
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-218 next last
To: Cathryn Crawford
Yet another great one!
41 posted on 10/31/2003 8:47:02 AM PST by honeygrl (All of the above is JUST MY OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford; Dane
I don't blame Dane reaction at all. The particular poster he was addressing whines and moans about FR on a daily basis, and then goes to other sites and badmouths us.
42 posted on 10/31/2003 8:47:33 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dane
When you are young and not idealogical you have no heart, when you are 40 and still idealogical you have no head.

And when you are 40 and have no job, you have no life.

Get a job, Dane.

43 posted on 10/31/2003 8:47:36 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: jmc813; Dane
Well, I just wanted Dane's opinion on the article. I actually like hearing what he thinks.
44 posted on 10/31/2003 8:48:22 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (Algunos misterios son tan profundos y maravillosos que deben ser explorados para ser entendido.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Does that negative reaction assume that people want Republicans to be right-of-center (or strict) conservatives?

In modern times, candidates run from the center, then govern from their extremes, for want of a better word. 
Bush seems to have stood that on its head.  He ran on conservative strengths, but governs from the center. 
Maybe that's how you get re-elected, by pulling in the uncommitted who voted against you last time.  Since the country is so evenly split, staying on your own side of the fence might lead to perpetually anemic domestic government, not that there's anything wrong with that.  ;)
45 posted on 10/31/2003 8:48:40 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Dane; Cathryn Crawford
No you are still young, some day when you get into the real world.

I disagree. I feel Cathryn is well beyond her years, and it shows in her writing. Calling Bush a centrist is an accurate assesment in my opinion, and should not be interpereted as a slur.

46 posted on 10/31/2003 8:49:17 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
And when you are 40 and have no job, you have no life.

Get a job, Dane

Why don't you get a freakin clue. Maybe someday you will.

47 posted on 10/31/2003 8:49:41 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Conservatism is a reflective term; it describes nothing but a position relative to something else.

That's Repubicanism, if there is such a word.  Conservatism has concrete principles. Reread the article.
48 posted on 10/31/2003 8:50:19 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Dane
idealogical

Churchill & Thatcher had better spelling.

49 posted on 10/31/2003 8:50:29 AM PST by Sloth ("I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!" -- Jacobim Mugatu, 'Zoolander')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Damn, chill out.
50 posted on 10/31/2003 8:50:39 AM PST by jmc813 (Michael Schiavo is a bigger scumbag than Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
"...in the United States, the GOP is the conservative party."

Not so much these days, it appears...MUD

51 posted on 10/31/2003 8:51:18 AM PST by Mudboy Slim (RE-IMPEACH Osama bil Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
We've got to face facts, though: partisanship is strangling this country. Both sides are guilty . . . look at the latest example: Finally, the economy is picking up a touch and the Democrats can't bring themselves to admit that Bush's tax cuts might've played a part in it. Who the hell does that help?
52 posted on 10/31/2003 8:51:49 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Don't you wish they were moving to the right, though?

Well, it's getting complicated these days.

If the President were to insist on a "balanced budget" (long thought to be a conservative position) and advocated that tax rates be adjusted (even upward, if necessary) to eliminate the current deficit, would that be a move to the right or to the left?

If the President had vetoed the bill prohibiting human cloning on the grounds that it is not within the federal government's enumerated powers, would that have been a move to the right or to the left? ;-)

53 posted on 10/31/2003 8:52:11 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Me caigo a mis rodillas y hablo a las estrellas de plata. "¿Qué misterios usted está encubriendo?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: gcruse; robertpaulsen
That's Repubicanism, if there is such a word. Conservatism has concrete principles. Reread the article.

Thanks, I did. Perhaps robertpaulsen would like to weigh in on the issue.

54 posted on 10/31/2003 8:52:50 AM PST by Hemingway's Ghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
I think it's pretty funny that people around here (mistakenly) attribute beliefs to ideals instead of principles.

Uh ideals and principles are the same thing. The name of the game, especially with the way the Founders set things up, is to give a little bit, but still basically stay true to those principles.

That is life.

55 posted on 10/31/2003 8:53:07 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Since the country is so evenly split, staying on your own side of the fence might lead to perpetually anemic domestic government, not that there's anything wrong with that. ;)

Okay, Seinfeld! ;-)


56 posted on 10/31/2003 8:53:20 AM PST by rdb3 (We're all gonna go, but I hate to go fast. Then again, it won't be fun to stick around and go last.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Why don't you get a freakin clue. Maybe someday you will.

I'll get a clue a hell of a lot sooner than you get a paycheck, boy.

57 posted on 10/31/2003 8:54:17 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Dane
Uh ideals and principles are the same thing. The name of the game, especially with the way the Founders set things up, is to give a little bit, but still basically stay true to those principles.

Then, I'm assuming that since you were less than positive towards my "idealism", you advocate people having no principles?

Since ideals and principles are the same thing and all.

You aren't being clear, Dane.

58 posted on 10/31/2003 8:54:55 AM PST by Cathryn Crawford (Algunos misterios son tan profundos y maravillosos que deben ser explorados para ser entendido.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Hemingway's Ghost
Who does it help? Heh, if they keep it up in the face of a recovery by election time, it will help us big time. Please, Dems, don't throw us in the briar patch!!!
59 posted on 10/31/2003 8:55:00 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: jmc813
Damn, chill out.

Dane is Illbay without all the charm. I'm usually easy going. Not with those two rectal clowns.

60 posted on 10/31/2003 8:55:12 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-218 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson