Laci
Posted on 10/31/2003 5:31:29 AM PST by runningbear
Laci
SCOTT: I WEEP IN JAIL
By HOWARD BREUER
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October 31, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Jail is a bummer to Scott Peterson, who says in letters to a pal that he's cried in his bunk over the deaths of the wife and son he allegedly killed.
"I am finding it so difficult to grieve for them here," he wrote in letters revealed by a local TV station.
"At night, I have my head buried in a blanket. I don't want the other inmates to see the tears."
Peterson's letters to a friend - written in pencil on a yellow legal pad - were reported by KTVU, a Fox affiliate in Oakland.
The suspect, held without bail in a solitary cell in the Stanislaus County Jail, said his grieving was especially difficult in the early hours of May 4, which would have been Laci's 28th birthday.
"I woke up early today to a crashing cell door. I figured it must be after midnight and, therefore, Laci's birthday," he wrote.
"I lay in this bunk dreaming about her, being able to hold her and Connor [his unborn son]. As the morning went on, all I could do was lay here in tears."
The food stinks, Peterson said. But he looks forward to his daily shower.
"You get to move around a room that is 8 feet by 20 feet without chains on," he wrote. "I try to spend as much time there as possible."
Word of Peterson's letters came as his lawyers battled in court yesterday to keep some DNA evidence out of his trial on grounds it was unreliable and may have been tampered with by cops.
The evidence - a strand of hair found in Peterson's boat, may prove the key piece of evidence that shows Laci Peterson, who was pregnant, was killed in the boat and dumped into San Francisco Bay.
Defense attorney Mark Geragos said the FBI should have matched the hair with a bone from Laci Peterson's body. But an FBI criminologist said that because the hair matches a DNA sample from Laci's mom, more tests aren't needed.
Yesterday was the second day of a hearing to determine if there's enough ..............
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peterson Trial Briefs
Reporters pounce when someone such as attorney Gloria Allred, left in purple, talks about the case during a break. AL GOLUB/THE BEE
Last Updated: October 30, 2003, 07:03:09 AM PST
DAY 1 SUMMARY
FBI DNA expert Candace Fisher testified about mitochondrial DNA testing; prosecutors are seeking to have it allowed as evidence.
Prosecutors indicated that they intend to call to the stand Laci Peterson's sister, Amy Rocha, and Scott and Laci Petersons' house cleaner.
Laci Peterson's brother, Brent Rocha, apparently won't be called to testify despite family members having said they were all tabbed as potential witnesses. Brent Rocha attended the entire proceeding Wednesday.
Judge Al Girolami ruled that Los Angeles attorney Gloria Allred, who represents Peterson's former girlfriend, Amber Frey, can remain in the courtroom as other witnesses testify.
Defense attorney Mark Geragos said he intends to call a DNA expert from Shields State University in New York.
UPCOMING
FBI DNA expert Candace Fisher is expected to take the stand again today for continued cross-examination.
The DNA expert from Shields State University is expected to testify Monday, defense attorney Mark Geragos said.
IN COURT
Laci Peterson's family: Sharon Rocha (mother), Ron Grantski (stepfather), Dennis Rocha (father), Brent Rocha (brother), Amy Rocha (sister).
Scott Peterson's family: Jackie Peterson (mother), Lee Peterson (father), Susan Caudillo (sister), Joe Peterson (brother), Janey Peterson (sister-in-law).
Others: Gloria Allred, attorney for witness Amber Frey; Greta Van Susteren, Fox News TV personality
SEEN AND HEARD
A cell phone or electronic data assistant clearly on vibrate went off at least three times in the media section during the morning session. A sheriff's deputy standing in the back of the courtroom told the bailiff he thought it was Fox News TV personality Greta Van Susteren's phone.
The judge has forbidden any broadcasts from the courtroom, and bailiffs repeatedly instructed attendees to turn off their cell phones.
During testimony by FBI DNA expert Candace Fisher, bailiffs handed a note each to Scott Peterson's parents, Lee and Jackie, on separate occasions.
The couple sat with other family members in the front row behind the defense table. All Scott Peterson's family members appeared to wear pins in the shape of a yellow ribbon overlaid with blue.
Pale yellow and blue ribbons were a near .........
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
City itself not caught in media wonderland
City itself not caught in media wonderland
Few members of the public lined up early Wednesday to get a seat in court on the first day of Scott Peterson's preliminary hearing. BART AH YOU/THE BEE
By JEFF JARDINE BEE LOCAL COLUMNIST
Last Updated: October 30, 2003, 09:53:49 AM PST
In the morning shadows of the Stanislaus County Courthouse, the rose garden provided great cover. Eldon Day peered through his binoculars, staring into the electronic media morass coagulated on 11th Street.
The 62-year-old Newman resident hoped to get a look at Geraldo Rivera or any of the other television celebrities he thought might be in town for Scott Peterson's preliminary hearing Wednesday.
"(Catherine) Crier from Court TV was here yesterday," he said.
Yet other than Day and a couple of Modesto Junior College students who snuck in to hobnob on media row, it was business as usual downtown on the first day of what could be a weeklong preliminary hearing.
And as they learned, there's really nothing interesting about being on the outside looking in.
This is Modesto -- not Los Angeles, where hundreds of people swarmed around the L.A. County Courthouse to stargaze at every proceeding during the O.J. Simpson trial.
This is Modesto, where working class folks aren't nearly as enamored with the national media as the national media is with itself.
This is Modesto, dealing with its third national story in the past five years.
Consequently, the opening day of the Scott Peterson hearing didn't cause nearly the problems authorities feared when they briefly considered shutting down a portion of I Street.
There are some simple reasons for this:
If you didn't already have a pass to get into the courtroom, there was little reason to be there. Only a few seats are available to the general public. The rest go to the families of Laci and Scott Peterson and the media.
With the number of media trucks the police anticipated, there was no better day to avoid going downtown unless you absolutely needed to be there. There were fewer people on the courthouse lawn Wednesday morning than on most other days.
Those who visited the civil court offices dealt with their business and didn't linger, as some often do.
The police did a commendable job of preparing for the media onslaught, using the future home of the Gallo Arts Center as a TV truck lot.
The Modesto Convention and Visitors Bureau set up a booth inside the media area on 11th, offering free coffee, doughnuts and sodas to the media. Kevin Shand said the bureau's intention is to convince the visiting media to do positive "sidebar" stories about Modesto while they're here.
But the wooing doesn't sit well with Michael O'Leary...........
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marjie Lundstrom: For Modestans, Peterson case sensational -- and personal
Marjie Lundstrom: For Modestans, Peterson case sensational -- and personal
By Marjie Lundstrom -- Bee Columnist
Published 2:15 a.m. PST Thursday, October 30, 2003
Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up here.
MODESTO -- Patrick the property manager came to get autographs. "Dan Abrams!" he blurted, lunging for the NBC correspondent.
Around the corner, Jerry the hot-dog stand owner hated to say it, but he was figuring to make money, perhaps double the usual take. Andy the social worker, who works nights, was drawn to this spot first thing in the morning -- a time he could be sleeping -- for reasons he couldn't quite explain, other than his burning curiosity.
They came here Wednesday on a perfect autumn day, gathering near a cordoned-off section of downtown Modesto. From a distance, the scene resembled a street fair with blue-and-white tents, portable bathrooms and clusters of spectators milling about.
Up close, there was no joy or celebration, only the trappings of a sensational murder case.
As fires raged in Southern California, garnering international media attention, this city of about 200,000 held its own in the week's news wars. Wednesday was the day the public and press had been waiting for in the legal proceedings against 31-year-old Scott Peterson, the former fertilizer salesman accused of murdering his wife, Laci, and unborn son, Conner.
"Oh, the plot twists!" said 43-year-old Patrick Kelly of Tracy, who drove to Modesto to collect autographs for his 13-year-old son outside the Stanislaus County Courthouse. "It's not been cut and dried at all."
And so it hasn't. It remained so Wednesday, as prosecutors made no stunning revelations, presenting exhaustive scientific testimony about DNA analysis.
But there is more to come -- the preliminary hearing could last five days -- and there is little doubt that the death of a pretty young pregnant woman and her son will continue to captivate this city and the nation.
This much is also true: In 2002, the same year Laci disappeared just before Christmas, 454 women were murdered in California -- shot, stabbed, beaten, poisoned, drugged, strangled, burned, drowned, asphyxiated and otherwise eliminated. The year before, there were 445, with more than one-fifth between ages 20 and 29 -- young females, like 27-year-old Laci Peterson, just moving into womanhood.
But Laci's is the case people remember, that many follow like a communal mystery novel. So many journalists tried to attend this week's proceedings, but could not get courtroom seats, that an "overflow" audio area was set up across the street under a large white tent.
On the sidewalk, Jack Williams, a 71-year-old retired appliance repairmen from Modesto, was so mesmerized by the spectacle he brought his video camera to "take pictures for posterity."
The murders have been a lot to bear for this community, which was central in the disappearances and murders of four other women in the last four years. First came Yosemite sightseers Carole and Juli Sund and Silvina Pelosso, kidnapped and murdered in 1999. Next came Chandra Levy, the young Modesto woman found murdered last year in Washington, D.C.
And then Laci, the dimpled expectant mother whose baffling disappearance had residents leaving their Christmas turkeys to join in the search.
To this day, it remains personal for many area residents.
"We're always talking ...........
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peterson case moves at last from tabloids to
courtroom
Posted on Tue, Oct. 28, 2003
Peterson case moves at last from tabloids to courtroom
By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES
Defense attorney Kirk McAllister, center, walks into court followed by his client, Scott Peterson on Oct. 17, 2003. (Associated Press)
A strand of hair. A piece of tape. A brown van.
A trail of evidence leading to Laci Peterson's killer has been left behind.
From the time the Modesto woman vanished Christmas Eve to the days in April when her remains and those of her unborn baby were found in Richmond, investigators have pieced together a strange mix of clues. Those leads, authorities said, point to the woman's husband, Scott Peterson, who was arrested April 18 and charged in her killing.
But defense lawyers using the same evidence and roundly different theories say the evidence not only exonerates their client, but also shows who really committed the brutal crime.
Both sides will begin using that evidence Wednesday at a preliminary hearing to convince a Stanislaus County judge that their theory is accurate. Only the judge can decide if there is enough evidence incriminating Peterson to hold him for trial on murder charges and special circumstances that allow prosecutors to pursue a death sentence.
Bit by bit
Once off-limits, much of the evidence that is expected to be presented at the preliminary hearing has slowly filtered to the reporters who have been digging away at one of the country's hottest real-life dramas. In the beginning, leaks were to blame, even as officials worked to conceal from the media what they had found.
Leaks about Scott Peterson's mistress and an insurance policy he reportedly had taken out on his wife months before she disappeared found their way into the headlines. There were leaks about cement residue in his boat and on human remains that turned out to be Laci Peterson and her unborn son.
An investigator leaked information about photographs and hair samples authorities collected from Scott Peterson early in the case. "A source close to the defense" leaked information about taped phone calls and evidence that pointed to "credible suspects" in Laci Peterson's disappearance.
There was a leaked autopsy report, providing eager reporters with information that Laci's fetus was found with tape around its neck and a gash to its body.
There also were leaks about the "true killers," who, according to the defense, remain at large.
Some theories claimed it was burglars................
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
Did editer not tell you that she is doing time? She's our token convict, in a way. She took the rap to save her daughter. She only has a couple more months to do b/f she gets to go to a halfway house.
Maybe it is time for us all to remember.
You are correct An American. If that affair indeed was not fact, Amber's father would have been right out there denying it.
We still don't know who the father of Amber's child is either.
From Enquirer:
3) " Police now want to re-interview Amber in view of recent developments. Jilted wife said "I see Amber on TV and she is acting all innocent. I screamed at the TV this is BS." The affair took place four years ago. Michelle became suspicous after Amber left a message on their answering machine. Michelle then confronted her husband he denied it at first, then admitted everything, saying they had met at the gym."
Hummmm! Amber thought nothing of calling this man's home.
From National Enquirer:
6) Little did Michelle know when she said the nasty stuff that Amber was setting her up and was recording Michelle. She then played back the tape for Michelle's husband. The affair ended three months later.
National Enquirer, January 28th, 2003
Hummmmm! It seems like Amber likes to tape record people.
Canadian, It could be the Roche's have been friendly with Amber just to learn all that she knows.
Also I wouldn't put it past her to have lied about calling Scott's home .
Click on the above link for the rest of the story.
It's my recollection, FWIW, that Amber did not make that denial herself. She called her daddy up at 5:30 a.m. because she hadn't been able to sleep. He made denials for her--one being the denial that "she never spoke to Laci". I don't think the denial was that she never called the Peterson home (left a message), or that she never called the home and spoke to Scott. If Daddy Frye did make a further public denial, it would NOT be Amber who actually did the talking. Maybe someone else has another recollection. I say we still need to see the phone records!!!
The driveway does connect with Covena Ave.
Do you see that little pickup in the arial view picture? Well pretend you are backing it straight out from where it is parked. You would then run into Covena Ave. (That pickup is not pointed towards the old garage doors, it is aimed at the gate.) you just don't visually see Covena Ave in the pictures. You just know it is there.
That end of the old garage with the 2 windows (now the end of the living room) faces Covena Ave. The driveway comes up along side of that section and then curves into where the garage doors would have been. There is a chimney there now and a door so they can go into the (new living room) from the driveway. .
Just to the left of that section with the two windows is the recessed section sticking out to the left (only because of the angle of that picture you can't see it) It has the 3 windows and there is an entrance to the house there. (Which I believe people coming off of the street would use.) This is also facing Covena Ave.
So if you were looking at the house straight on from Covena Ave. You would see that recessed section with the three windows and the section closer to the street with the 2 windows.
Spunky, Spunky, Spunky....You may be right; however, tonight on Fox News, a film clip of Scott and Mackenzie was shown running down a street. Then the clip showed Scott and dog making a right turn, jogging into a driveway. I assume that the driveway was his driveway, and the street was Covena. I could NOT see the front entrance to the house. All I could see was the end of the house that we usually see, which is, I believe, the living room.
Then, there was another film clip of the gate we frequently see Scott going into, only tonight, police were entering it. It is on the left side of the house near the front. The gate is apparently hinged to a brick wall, covered in some kind of viney green growth (like ivy). Do you get Fox? Anybody else see Fox tonight that has been paying attention to this most worthy dispute?
Then, there was another film clip of the gate we frequently see Scott going into, only tonight, police were entering it. It is on the left side of the house near the front. The gate is apparently hinged to a brick wall,
In your minds eye rotate this picture so the part with the 3 windows is looking straight at you.
That light grey color you see on the right is the patio cover or carport. The driveway goes toward that, between Scotts house and the neighbors on their right.. (angles of pictures are deceiving.) The pool is more on the side of the house.
Now if that house was turned straight on, and the back is say (north) and Scott was running up the street sidewalk going west, he would make a right turn into the driveway.
Now you say in another shot of Fox news you saw a gate towards the left of the front of the house.
Remember photographers have zoom lenses. Scott could have been on the side where those 3 windows are which I am sure there is a gate there also. So it would be to the left of the house if the picture was taken there. Also they do have brick work running around the bottom part of the house.
See that grey area in the bottom left? that is the other neighbors house left of Scotts.
Like I said, just twist the house in this picture straight on and Covena would run across the bottom of the picture.
I don't have cable so I don't get Fox or CTV.
Now, I don't believe the "L" with the windows is visible from the street because there is a gate and wall covered with greenery obstructing that view. Are we on the same page now?
Oh Sandylapper, I never thought about it before but it is possible that there is a fence coming out from the side of that old garage (living area) making what is called intering a courtyard at the front of the house. That is the only way you would not see that from the street.
I do know in one of the pictures I saw, you could tell there was like a brick walkway going towards that door in the little recessed area by the 3 windows.
Yes, now that I think of it, a lot of California homes have hidden court yards at the front of the house.
I am going to bed now. Goodnight.
P.S. What side of the country do you live on?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.