Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOTT: I WEEP IN JAIL
The NY Post ^ | October 31, 2003 | HOWARD BREUER

Posted on 10/31/2003 5:31:29 AM PST by runningbear

SCOTT: I WEEP IN JAIL


Laci

SCOTT: I WEEP IN JAIL

By HOWARD BREUER

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

October 31, 2003 -- MODESTO, Calif. - Jail is a bummer to Scott Peterson, who says in letters to a pal that he's cried in his bunk over the deaths of the wife and son he allegedly killed.

"I am finding it so difficult to grieve for them here," he wrote in letters revealed by a local TV station.

"At night, I have my head buried in a blanket. I don't want the other inmates to see the tears."

Peterson's letters to a friend - written in pencil on a yellow legal pad - were reported by KTVU, a Fox affiliate in Oakland.

The suspect, held without bail in a solitary cell in the Stanislaus County Jail, said his grieving was especially difficult in the early hours of May 4, which would have been Laci's 28th birthday.

"I woke up early today to a crashing cell door. I figured it must be after midnight and, therefore, Laci's birthday," he wrote.

"I lay in this bunk dreaming about her, being able to hold her and Connor [his unborn son]. As the morning went on, all I could do was lay here in tears."

The food stinks, Peterson said. But he looks forward to his daily shower.

"You get to move around a room that is 8 feet by 20 feet without chains on," he wrote. "I try to spend as much time there as possible."

Word of Peterson's letters came as his lawyers battled in court yesterday to keep some DNA evidence out of his trial on grounds it was unreliable and may have been tampered with by cops.

The evidence - a strand of hair found in Peterson's boat, may prove the key piece of evidence that shows Laci Peterson, who was pregnant, was killed in the boat and dumped into San Francisco Bay.

Defense attorney Mark Geragos said the FBI should have matched the hair with a bone from Laci Peterson's body. But an FBI criminologist said that because the hair matches a DNA sample from Laci's mom, more tests aren't needed.

Yesterday was the second day of a hearing to determine if there's enough ..............

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson Trial Briefs

Peterson Trial Briefs


Reporters pounce when someone such as attorney Gloria Allred, left in purple, talks about the case during a break. AL GOLUB/THE BEE

Last Updated: October 30, 2003, 07:03:09 AM PST

DAY 1 SUMMARY

FBI DNA expert Candace Fisher testified about mitochondrial DNA testing; prosecutors are seeking to have it allowed as evidence.

Prosecutors indicated that they intend to call to the stand Laci Peterson's sister, Amy Rocha, and Scott and Laci Petersons' house cleaner.

Laci Peterson's brother, Brent Rocha, apparently won't be called to testify despite family members having said they were all tabbed as potential witnesses. Brent Rocha attended the entire proceeding Wednesday.

Judge Al Girolami ruled that Los Angeles attorney Gloria Allred, who represents Peterson's former girlfriend, Amber Frey, can remain in the courtroom as other witnesses testify.

Defense attorney Mark Geragos said he intends to call a DNA expert from Shields State University in New York.

UPCOMING

FBI DNA expert Candace Fisher is expected to take the stand again today for continued cross-examination.

The DNA expert from Shields State University is expected to testify Monday, defense attorney Mark Geragos said.

IN COURT

Laci Peterson's family: Sharon Rocha (mother), Ron Grantski (stepfather), Dennis Rocha (father), Brent Rocha (brother), Amy Rocha (sister).

Scott Peterson's family: Jackie Peterson (mother), Lee Peterson (father), Susan Caudillo (sister), Joe Peterson (brother), Janey Peterson (sister-in-law).

Others: Gloria Allred, attorney for witness Amber Frey; Greta Van Susteren, Fox News TV personality

SEEN AND HEARD

A cell phone or electronic data assistant clearly on vibrate went off at least three times in the media section during the morning session. A sheriff's deputy standing in the back of the courtroom told the bailiff he thought it was Fox News TV personality Greta Van Susteren's phone.

The judge has forbidden any broadcasts from the courtroom, and bailiffs repeatedly instructed attendees to turn off their cell phones.

During testimony by FBI DNA expert Candace Fisher, bailiffs handed a note each to Scott Peterson's parents, Lee and Jackie, on separate occasions.

The couple sat with other family members in the front row behind the defense table. All Scott Peterson's family members appeared to wear pins in the shape of a yellow ribbon overlaid with blue.

Pale yellow and blue ribbons were a near .........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

City itself not caught in media wonderland

City itself not caught in media wonderland


Few members of the public lined up early Wednesday to get a seat in court on the first day of Scott Peterson's preliminary hearing. BART AH YOU/THE BEE

By JEFF JARDINE BEE LOCAL COLUMNIST

Last Updated: October 30, 2003, 09:53:49 AM PST

In the morning shadows of the Stanislaus County Courthouse, the rose garden provided great cover. Eldon Day peered through his binoculars, staring into the electronic media morass coagulated on 11th Street.

The 62-year-old Newman resident hoped to get a look at Geraldo Rivera or any of the other television celebrities he thought might be in town for Scott Peterson's preliminary hearing Wednesday.

"(Catherine) Crier from Court TV was here yesterday," he said.

Yet other than Day and a couple of Modesto Junior College students who snuck in to hobnob on media row, it was business as usual downtown on the first day of what could be a weeklong preliminary hearing.

And as they learned, there's really nothing interesting about being on the outside looking in.

This is Modesto -- not Los Angeles, where hundreds of people swarmed around the L.A. County Courthouse to stargaze at every proceeding during the O.J. Simpson trial.

This is Modesto, where working class folks aren't nearly as enamored with the national media as the national media is with itself.

This is Modesto, dealing with its third national story in the past five years.

Consequently, the opening day of the Scott Peterson hearing didn't cause nearly the problems authorities feared when they briefly considered shutting down a portion of I Street.

There are some simple reasons for this:

If you didn't already have a pass to get into the courtroom, there was little reason to be there. Only a few seats are available to the general public. The rest go to the families of Laci and Scott Peterson and the media.

With the number of media trucks the police anticipated, there was no better day to avoid going downtown unless you absolutely needed to be there. There were fewer people on the courthouse lawn Wednesday morning than on most other days.

Those who visited the civil court offices dealt with their business and didn't linger, as some often do.

The police did a commendable job of preparing for the media onslaught, using the future home of the Gallo Arts Center as a TV truck lot.

The Modesto Convention and Visitors Bureau set up a booth inside the media area on 11th, offering free coffee, doughnuts and sodas to the media. Kevin Shand said the bureau's intention is to convince the visiting media to do positive "sidebar" stories about Modesto while they're here.

But the wooing doesn't sit well with Michael O'Leary...........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marjie Lundstrom: For Modestans, Peterson case sensational -- and personal

Marjie Lundstrom: For Modestans, Peterson case sensational -- and personal

By Marjie Lundstrom -- Bee Columnist

Published 2:15 a.m. PST Thursday, October 30, 2003

Get weekday updates of Sacramento Bee headlines and breaking news. Sign up here.

MODESTO -- Patrick the property manager came to get autographs. "Dan Abrams!" he blurted, lunging for the NBC correspondent.

Around the corner, Jerry the hot-dog stand owner hated to say it, but he was figuring to make money, perhaps double the usual take. Andy the social worker, who works nights, was drawn to this spot first thing in the morning -- a time he could be sleeping -- for reasons he couldn't quite explain, other than his burning curiosity.

They came here Wednesday on a perfect autumn day, gathering near a cordoned-off section of downtown Modesto. From a distance, the scene resembled a street fair with blue-and-white tents, portable bathrooms and clusters of spectators milling about.

Up close, there was no joy or celebration, only the trappings of a sensational murder case.

As fires raged in Southern California, garnering international media attention, this city of about 200,000 held its own in the week's news wars. Wednesday was the day the public and press had been waiting for in the legal proceedings against 31-year-old Scott Peterson, the former fertilizer salesman accused of murdering his wife, Laci, and unborn son, Conner.

"Oh, the plot twists!" said 43-year-old Patrick Kelly of Tracy, who drove to Modesto to collect autographs for his 13-year-old son outside the Stanislaus County Courthouse. "It's not been cut and dried at all."

And so it hasn't. It remained so Wednesday, as prosecutors made no stunning revelations, presenting exhaustive scientific testimony about DNA analysis.

But there is more to come -- the preliminary hearing could last five days -- and there is little doubt that the death of a pretty young pregnant woman and her son will continue to captivate this city and the nation.

This much is also true: In 2002, the same year Laci disappeared just before Christmas, 454 women were murdered in California -- shot, stabbed, beaten, poisoned, drugged, strangled, burned, drowned, asphyxiated and otherwise eliminated. The year before, there were 445, with more than one-fifth between ages 20 and 29 -- young females, like 27-year-old Laci Peterson, just moving into womanhood.

But Laci's is the case people remember, that many follow like a communal mystery novel. So many journalists tried to attend this week's proceedings, but could not get courtroom seats, that an "overflow" audio area was set up across the street under a large white tent.

On the sidewalk, Jack Williams, a 71-year-old retired appliance repairmen from Modesto, was so mesmerized by the spectacle he brought his video camera to "take pictures for posterity."

The murders have been a lot to bear for this community, which was central in the disappearances and murders of four other women in the last four years. First came Yosemite sightseers Carole and Juli Sund and Silvina Pelosso, kidnapped and murdered in 1999. Next came Chandra Levy, the young Modesto woman found murdered last year in Washington, D.C.

And then Laci, the dimpled expectant mother whose baffling disappearance had residents leaving their Christmas turkeys to join in the search.

To this day, it remains personal for many area residents.

"We're always talking ...........

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Peterson case moves at last from tabloids to

courtroom

Posted on Tue, Oct. 28, 2003

Peterson case moves at last from tabloids to courtroom

By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES


Defense attorney Kirk McAllister, center, walks into court followed by his client, Scott Peterson on Oct. 17, 2003. (Associated Press)

A strand of hair. A piece of tape. A brown van.

A trail of evidence leading to Laci Peterson's killer has been left behind.

From the time the Modesto woman vanished Christmas Eve to the days in April when her remains and those of her unborn baby were found in Richmond, investigators have pieced together a strange mix of clues. Those leads, authorities said, point to the woman's husband, Scott Peterson, who was arrested April 18 and charged in her killing.

But defense lawyers using the same evidence and roundly different theories say the evidence not only exonerates their client, but also shows who really committed the brutal crime.

Both sides will begin using that evidence Wednesday at a preliminary hearing to convince a Stanislaus County judge that their theory is accurate. Only the judge can decide if there is enough evidence incriminating Peterson to hold him for trial on murder charges and special circumstances that allow prosecutors to pursue a death sentence.

Bit by bit

Once off-limits, much of the evidence that is expected to be presented at the preliminary hearing has slowly filtered to the reporters who have been digging away at one of the country's hottest real-life dramas. In the beginning, leaks were to blame, even as officials worked to conceal from the media what they had found.

Leaks about Scott Peterson's mistress and an insurance policy he reportedly had taken out on his wife months before she disappeared found their way into the headlines. There were leaks about cement residue in his boat and on human remains that turned out to be Laci Peterson and her unborn son.

An investigator leaked information about photographs and hair samples authorities collected from Scott Peterson early in the case. "A source close to the defense" leaked information about taped phone calls and evidence that pointed to "credible suspects" in Laci Peterson's disappearance.

There was a leaked autopsy report, providing eager reporters with information that Laci's fetus was found with tape around its neck and a gash to its body.

There also were leaks about the "true killers," who, according to the defense, remain at large.

Some theories claimed it was burglars................

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: avoidingchildsupport; baby; babyunborn; conner; deathpenaltytime; dontubelievemyalibi; getarope; ibefishing; isthisoprahorfr; laci; lacipeterson; smallbaby; smallchild; sonkiller; unborn; wifekiller
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800801-818 next last
To: Sandylapper; RGSpincich
"But I'll bet you a bag of donuts that Laci had mentioned putting an interior fence around the pool to protect Connor and any other small children who came over."

I'll bet you are right RG. My sister-in-law who lives in Fremont, CA had a wrought iron fence separating the pool from the rest of the yard.

"Yes, and the fence/gate where we see Scott going in, is considered the "back yard", even though it reaches the front of the house as seen from Covena Avenue."

I am going to have to find that picture of Scott going in the gate.

I don't see it as the back yard. I see it as the side yard and I don't think that 6 ft fence goes all the way to the front of the house.

Sandy, exactly what are you calling the front of the house?
Are you still confused, or am I getting that way.:-)

781 posted on 11/03/2003 1:30:40 PM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 780 | View Replies]

To: Spunky; RGSpincich; All
That would depend on what you call the "main entrance"

Spunky, I'm not trying to be argumentive, honest, but unless you turned into that driveway, I don't think the main entrance (front door) of the home could be seen clearly from Covena.As a matter of fact, I don't think the front entrance or rear entrance is visible from Covena, because the house is situated lengthwise on the lot.

RG mentioned that the Peterson house seemed to conform with others in the neighborhood. It could be that 50 odd years ago, that whoever developed the neighborhood sold narrow but deep lots, and that all the houses were to built lengthwise, and it could have been so stipulated in the contract whenever the lot was sold.

The reason I think this is that other than the aerial view, photographers don't ever seem to go onto the property. The photographs all seem to be from the street, and we never see the front entrance.

782 posted on 11/03/2003 1:42:33 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 770 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
Okay, where is everybody???
783 posted on 11/03/2003 1:44:40 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 782 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Spunk, I think the photo no. 3 is what you see from Covena. True, I can't distinguish the fence and gate, but believe it is very near the front of the house. By opening that gate, Scott always appears to be headed for the back entrance. That's what I think but I could be wrong.
784 posted on 11/03/2003 1:55:59 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
I'm here, CO, but unfortunately, I have to leave for a while. ;)
785 posted on 11/03/2003 1:59:04 PM PST by Sandylapper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 783 | View Replies]

To: Velveeta
I think your assessment is probably pretty close to what the DA has in his briefcase. One of the best summations I've read as to motive and timeline.
786 posted on 11/03/2003 4:35:37 PM PST by Queen Jadis (Violence against women is unapproachable. ... She was ok with it. Glorious... I WEEP IN JAIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 723 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
red crosses on pics, me too..WHY?
787 posted on 11/03/2003 4:37:19 PM PST by Queen Jadis (Violence against women is unapproachable. ... She was ok with it. Glorious... I WEEP IN JAIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 777 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
Spunky i can't view your pics...red crosses in upper right hand corner. Any ideas? P.S..I love the Car keys story. Know I know why you are called Spunky! How long ago did was that incident?
788 posted on 11/03/2003 4:39:26 PM PST by Queen Jadis (Violence against women is unapproachable. ... She was ok with it. Glorious... I WEEP IN JAIL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 762 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
HEY EVERYBODY: I just listened to Kimberly Guilfoile-Newsom, the SanFransico Prosecutor outline what the Prosecution in this case has done so far: She said that with the exception of the DNA witness, they are systematically undermining Scott Peterson's alibi, they are exposing his deceitfulness and she said If Amber Frey testifies in the Prelim, if she holds her ground with Geragos and doesn't allow him to rattle her, she will do tremendous damage to Peterson. She sees the Prosecution firstly, damaging and leaving questions as to Peterson's alibi and just as importantly, beginning to show a "pattern" of deceit and lies from Peterson from the FIRST night it was publically known that Laci was missing.
789 posted on 11/03/2003 4:46:17 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 785 | View Replies]

To: editer
>>NOT EVEN TO VISIT?? (-: <<

Nope. Never knew anyone in jail or prison. :-)


790 posted on 11/03/2003 4:49:58 PM PST by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper
>>If the detective got back to her before the 23rd, she knew Scott was married. Why would she call him at his home knowing he was a married man, and run the risk of having his wife answer? <<

Think about that Melissa Hart story. If true, and so far there have been no retractions, then it would be in keeping with Amber's past behavior when "dating" married men.
791 posted on 11/03/2003 4:52:45 PM PST by An American In Dairyland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 692 | View Replies]

To: Sandylapper; Queen Jadis; Velveeta
"Spunk, I think the photo no. 3 is what you see from Covena. True, I can't distinguish the fence and gate, but believe it is very near the front of the house."


Sandy, that third picture in my other posting (now posted here) is facing Covena Ave. only the picture was taken just a little after you have passed directly in front of the house. If you look real close you can see the driveway curving in towards the old garage (now living room) The wooden gate is there on the right side of that chimney. I do believe from the pictures of the inside of the house's (new living room, old garage) there is a door just beyond that chimney also.

Now go down to the bottom picture and if you look carefully at the top of the picture, you will see that the wooden fence ends where that carport/patio cover is. A little more than half way up the side of the house.

I think the photographers were standing more on the sidewalk by the neighbors yard. (Just the other side of that pickup at top of picture) and took the picture of Scott standing by the gate there.

I think what may be deceiving is a person assumes the pool is in the back yard, where in actuality the white covered patio or carport, which ever it is, and the pool are on the side of the house

If you look real carefully you can see part of a neighbors house at the top of the picture (just under where it say Peterson home) Then if you look in the bottom right corner you will see the other neighbors roof. The lot size is deeper than wider and the house does go back on it.


Now here is what you do. Get up out of your computer chair, twist your body to the left as you keep looking back at the picture. Once you get twisted all around you will see that the top right of the picture is the front of the house facing Covena Ave. :-)

792 posted on 11/03/2003 5:01:01 PM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: Queen Jadis
"Spunky i can't view your pics...red crosses in upper right hand corner. Any ideas? P.S..I love the Car keys story. Know I know why you are called Spunky! How long ago did was that incident?"

I think FreeRepublic is all messed up. I was hoping when they shut down last night that they would have gotten it fixed. Sometimes I can see the pictures and other times I can't.

That incident with the car happened about 8 or 9 years ago.

793 posted on 11/03/2003 5:08:14 PM PST by Spunky (This little tag just keeps following me where ever I go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 788 | View Replies]

To: An American In Dairyland
Amber has denied that she ever called their home or that she ever spoke with Laci!! I think IF it were known that she knew he was married, then Laci's relatives wouldn't be friendly with her which they are apparently.
794 posted on 11/03/2003 5:11:19 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 791 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
I still have red x's today too.!!
795 posted on 11/03/2003 5:16:02 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Spunky
WHERE is everybody. I don't usually get much of a thrill talking to myself. LOL
796 posted on 11/03/2003 5:18:21 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 793 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
AAARRRGGGHHHHHH!! I'm going to watch TV!!
797 posted on 11/03/2003 5:50:24 PM PST by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Check your pings Lynn! I pinged ya to today's thread!
798 posted on 11/03/2003 5:54:12 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 796 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Lynn, I think you should post your 785 post here on today's thread...not much new over there...I will be cruisin' the shows tonight for anything new...
799 posted on 11/03/2003 5:56:37 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 789 | View Replies]

To: Canadian Outrage
Make that your 789 post...
800 posted on 11/03/2003 5:57:57 PM PST by Jackie-O
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 741-760761-780781-800801-818 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson