Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ABC Special Explores if Jesus Had Wife
Atlanta Journal-Constitution ^ | 10.30.03 | DAVID BAUDER

Posted on 10/30/2003 7:46:04 PM PST by mhking

NEW YORK — ABC News correspondent Elizabeth Vargas concedes her network is stepping into a theological minefield with its one-hour exploration of whether Jesus Christ had a wife.

The ABC News special, "Jesus, Mary and DaVinci," is scheduled to air Monday at 8 p.m. ET.

"You can't talk about this subject without intriguing people or offending people," Vargas said Thursday. "We're trying to do it as respectfully as we can."

ABC screened the special for some reporters and religious leaders on Thursday. The program is based on the best-selling novel, "The DaVinci Code," which claims to be partly grounded on historical fact.

The book asserts that Mary Magdalene was Jesus' wife — not a prostitute, as in some teachings — and that she fled Jerusalem with his child following his crucifixion.

The story was kept alive for centuries by a secret society that included the painter Leonardo DaVinci, who supposedly inserted clues about it in his art, the book claimed.

The ABC special outlines the theories and speaks to several theologians who either discount the story or assert that it is possible.

The show unravels like a mystery perpetuated by secondhand gossip. Vargas said ABC found no proof that Jesus had a wife, but couldn't completely discount it, either.

Vargas, who was raised a Roman Catholic, said her own parents said to her, "Oh, my goodness, what are you doing?" when they found out she was working on the story.

She said she was never aware of the power struggles and political intrigue that went into how her faith is taught today.

"For me, it's made religion more real and, ironically, much more interesting — which is what we're hoping to do for our viewers," she said.

It drew some immediate criticism, particularly from a representative of the Catholic League, who said ABC News relied too heavily on the opinion of Father Richard McBrien of Notre Dame, who believes Mary Magdalene's importance has been historically understated and that it's possible she was his wife.

"I think it was not sufficiently balanced," said Joseph DeFeo, policy analyst for the Catholic League. "The majority of the people who spoke believed in either the plausibility or the outright truth of (book author) Dan Brown's claims. The facts themselves scream out that this is a crackpot theory."

The show even drew criticism from Nikki Stephanopoulos, mother of ABC News correspondent George and the communications director for the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America. She the special might offend people who believe that women have a more prominent role in the church.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arielsabar; catholiclist; epigraphyandlanguage; faithandphilosophy; godsgravesglyphs; gospelofjesuswife; harvard; hewasarabbi; jamescameron; jesuswife; karenking; letshavejerusalem; mariame; mariamne; marymagdalene; rabbismarry; religion; sectarianturmoil; simchajacobovici; talpiot; veritas; weddingatcana
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-354 next last
To: mhking
The book asserts that Mary Magdalene was Jesus' wife — not a prostitute, as in some teachings — and that she fled Jerusalem with his child following his crucifixion.

Yep .. I can see how many would be offended by this show

Question is .. exactly what point does ABC think they are trying to make here?

61 posted on 10/30/2003 8:41:43 PM PST by Mo1 (http://www.favewavs.com/wavs/cartoons/spdemocrats.wav)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Judith Anne
Oh, and I like your screenname.

And that's the truth. Thpthpthpthpth!!!
62 posted on 10/30/2003 8:42:58 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: mhking; All
I wonder if they'd do an exploratory piece next--

"Was Muhammad really a homosexual?"


63 posted on 10/30/2003 8:43:08 PM PST by I'm ALL Right! (He is no fool who would give what he cannot keep to gain what he can never lose. - Jim Elliot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
This is absolute tripe. Only a generation of ignoramuses produced by decaying public schools and liberal brainwashers would entertain such nonsense posing as history for a second.

See Sandra Miesel's Article, "Dismantling the DaVinci Code" in Crisis Magazine:

http://www.crisismagazine.com/september2003/feature1.htm
64 posted on 10/30/2003 8:44:53 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
And that's the truth. Thpthpthpthpth!!!

I think you were thinking of 'Edith Ann'.


65 posted on 10/30/2003 8:45:07 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Yes, with Joseph of Arimithea, the Magdalene's uncle or some such...she was supposedly the grail, holding Christ's blood (descendents).

The authors went through a lot of speculative back alleys to come up with their theories...
66 posted on 10/30/2003 8:45:24 PM PST by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: mhking
There's some historical suggestion that Mohammed liked the very young ones. Why not do a program about that?
67 posted on 10/30/2003 8:45:26 PM PST by isrul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
exactly what point does ABC think they are trying to make here?

Certainly not to show that Jesus had a wife, because that's obviously just speculation. The purpose, I believe, is to insert doubt into people whose faith isn't so strong -- and there's no shortage of those types.

68 posted on 10/30/2003 8:45:30 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Well, thanks. ;-D
69 posted on 10/30/2003 8:46:17 PM PST by Judith Anne (Cyanide, mercury, and botulinum toxin are medically and industrially useful friends to mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Where will we be 20 years from now.

Closer to the situation portrayed in Jerry Jenkins's new novel, SOON, than one might believe possible. Within twenty years, I think Christians will be treated as a scourge by society. Freedom of worship will have been severely curtailed, as will freedom of speech where the Bible is concerned.

MM

70 posted on 10/30/2003 8:48:43 PM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mhking
"You can't talk about this subject without intriguing people or offending people," Vargas said Thursday. "We're trying to do it as respectfully as we can."

What a flaming liar. What is wrong with these people???

I guarantee you, because of Dubya's professed Christian faith, these "controversial" anti-conservative hit pieces are going to build to a huge crescendo as Election 2004 approaches. Look at what these cowards are doing. Attacking Reagan, attacking Jesus, attacking Hoover. I don't know what Hoover would have done, maybe he would have gone after them. Reagan, if he was lucid, I'm sure would be silent. The man just had too much class and dignity to respond to this garbage. His record stands on its own.

Jesus, of course, doesn't have to respond. We all get to face the judgement seat, when that embarassing book will be opened, IMHO. Not fun. They know not what they do.

71 posted on 10/30/2003 8:49:18 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I'm ALL Right!
Actually, they should do a piece on whether Mohammed actually existed -- it's a fascinating subject that's guaranteed to get your network bombed.

I think it's a risk ABC should take.

72 posted on 10/30/2003 8:49:55 PM PST by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet
They know not what they do.

I don't give them that much credit. They know. They just don't care.

They will pay the price for their lack of vision.

73 posted on 10/30/2003 8:51:58 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Young Rhino
I miss Sam, too.

"Joseph's walking around going, "Yeah, you had better be the Son of God, I'll tell you that. You had BETTER be him, little mister. And you'd better be the ONLY Son of God."

That man is up there with the heavenly Host right now, cracking `em up. I am sure that St. Peter only lets you in if you have a sense of humor.
74 posted on 10/30/2003 8:52:25 PM PST by LibertarianInExile (The scariest nine words in the English Language: We're from the government. We're here to help you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Timesink
Then why talk about it at all?

If they couldn't find proof he was married, what are they showing this crap?

75 posted on 10/30/2003 8:52:34 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: F16Fighter
b) WW III

Nah, maybe WW IV--we're fighting WW III right now. Its just hardly anybody calls it that...yet.

Then again, you may be right. We might still be fighting WW III.

76 posted on 10/30/2003 8:58:28 PM PST by ConservativeLawyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
Thank you---I'm brain-dead...
77 posted on 10/30/2003 8:59:21 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Bloody Sam Roberts
They know. They just don't care. They will pay the price for their lack of vision.

I'll agree with you they just don't care, but if they knew, they wouldn't be doing this. If any of us really knew, none of us would be doing the dumb things we all do. At least, I'm aware, and try to keep my dumbness down to a low roar. But, yowsa, they will pay the price for their lack of vision.

78 posted on 10/30/2003 9:00:44 PM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: mplsconservative
blasphemy, b.s., whats the difference? the media does not believe in THE TRUTH anyway, so WTF??? WE shall know soon enough, as shall nonbelievers......
79 posted on 10/30/2003 9:01:11 PM PST by Highway Kind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason
Naaahhh. Easy mistake. Criminee, it was over 30 years ago.
80 posted on 10/30/2003 9:04:16 PM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 341-354 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson