Skip to comments.
New Secret Aircraft? The mysterious TR-3B
hostileinvader ^
Posted on 10/29/2003 4:30:56 PM PST by Partisan Hack
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: Lazamataz
Oh, I forgot. Some "beliefs" preclude the notion of non-earthly sentient beings.
I apologise for conflicting with your comprehensive and clear understanding of reality.
To: Junior
Heavily-foiled placemarker... I'll bet you said that about the F-117A...before it was released.
To: Partisan Hack
43
posted on
10/29/2003 5:07:35 PM PST
by
PokeyJoe
(Don't talk about my armchair unless you know how to pull the recliner lever.)
To: satan
I had a TR-4 in '62
To: cavtrooper21
Caveman..... perfect handle.
I love the irony!
To: abner
Nope. My brother had (and still has) a TR-4, 1966 model, I believe, and has also owned MGBs, TR-6s, and Spitfires at various times over the past 25 years. All were still "powered" by items from the Prince of Darkness himself, Joe Lucas.
}:-)4
46
posted on
10/29/2003 5:07:44 PM PST
by
Moose4
(What America needs is less "law" and more common sense.)
To: All
47
posted on
10/29/2003 5:07:59 PM PST
by
Bob J
(www.freerepublic.net www.radiofreerepublic.com...check them out!)
To: aruanan
No. "It's" is correct. "It's" is a contraction of "it is" and so an apostrophe is approriate. "Its" is used as a possessive form for "it", and no apostrophe is required. If you are going to be a spelling Nazi, try to get it write.
To: Lancey Howard
The spelling nazi also didn't realize that I didn't write the article!
To: PokeyJoe
Neanderthal.
To: Lancey Howard; aruanan
Oh wait! You WERE correct!
Sorry. Proceed.
To: MediaMole
LOL!
To: abner
The big change with the TR3-B is that it had a syncro 1st gear. They also kept the model around because they weren't sure the TR4 would sell.
53
posted on
10/29/2003 5:15:50 PM PST
by
HBAR223
To: Partisan Hack
How bout a Mecca flyover?How about a landing with the second coming of Mohammed carrying the King James.
To: Partisan Hack
To: Lancey Howard
"It's un-earthly technology and sight will literally blow your mind. The US Patriots " Actually, I think the spelling nazi was right. The phrases "un-earthly technology" and "sight" are being described as its attributes that will blow your mind.
The sentence really should have read, "The sight of the plane and its unearthly technology will literally blow your mind"
The whole sentence is stupid, especially the phrase "literally blow your mind"
To: TheOtherOne
About as stupid as a claim of Mach 9 in the atmosphere.
It would melt. The only reason a SR-71 does'nt is the supercold fuel the cools the skin before being burned.
They obviously have some kind of superefficent heat capacitor they are'nt telling us about!
57
posted on
10/29/2003 5:27:07 PM PST
by
Dinsdale
To: Partisan Hack
To: Partisan Hack
If we really, really did have this technology since 1994, wouldn't Willie have sold it to the Chinese?
59
posted on
10/29/2003 5:28:37 PM PST
by
Tacis
To: Partisan Hack
A 'test drive' of this thing will literally 'blow your socks off' - so special 'sock restraints' are worn by all who ride in her -
- let me be the first to tell ya ...
60
posted on
10/29/2003 5:29:28 PM PST
by
_Jim
( <--- Resources on Solar effects, effects on satellites, power systems)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-165 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
