Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terry Schiavo: Another Case of Convenience v. Compassion
catholic.org ^ | 2003-10-23 | Derek Holser

Posted on 10/28/2003 3:37:41 PM PST by nickcarraway

As a child, I was taught the story of the Good Samaritan. In this parable, a man is found on a roadside, having been robbed and beaten by some bandits and then left to die. This man is never named, never given an identity, he is just another of the needy among us. As he lay in the dirt, bloodied and bruised, two men pass by him on their way to various destinations.

Perhaps like many of us, the men that passed him that day were busy, and it would be inconvenient for them to show any true compassion. Perhaps they thought, “I gave some money to a charity recently”, or “someone else will help this hapless soul.” Amazingly, the first man to pass by this poor wounded person is a priest, a man entrusted by his ordination to care for the less fortunate among us. The second man, a lawyer, passes by him even though he may be able to offer this victim the protection of the law by assisting him in identifying and bringing to justice those criminals who left him to die.

I wonder how many of us would pass by this nameless man? I wonder how many of us would find it inconvenient to help those who have been left to die?

Terry Schiavo was left to die last week, and many people among us were willing to pass her by, thinking it was inconvenient or unnecessary to provide assistance to someone that is not currently experiencing “a full life”. Like Terry Schiavo, the nameless man was not currently experiencing what society would have deemed “a full life”. Thankfully, compassion overcame convenience and someone stopped to help him. Thankfully, the Florida Legislature and Governor Jeb Bush allowed compassion to overcome convenience by stopping to help Terry Schiavo this week.

The battle between compassion and convenience is one that we each fight on a daily basis. Although we may be busy working and living, we must also be compassionate to the less fortunate among us. The reason we must be compassionate is clear: it is a response to the essence of humanity, being made in the image of the Creator. The story of the Good Samaritan has an interesting beginning – The story is prompted by the question, “Who is my neighbor?”

“Who is my neighbor?” I believe this question is motivated by a desire to limit the bounds of our charity. The man asking the question is seeking to restrict his solidarity to a small group in his community. Yet Jesus blows that notion to smithereens by telling a story about a Jew being helped by his mortal enemy, a Samaritan. In the end, Jesus’ interrogator realizes the true meaning of being a neighbor. A neighbor is someone who allows compassion to overcome convenience.

When compassion wins, new relationships are created; when convenience wins, old relationships remain status quo. When compassion wins, the fullness of life is experienced; when convenience wins, the emptiness of existence is perpetuated. When compassion wins, a culture is humanized; when convenience wins, mankind becomes more mechanistic.

This week, in the life of Terry Schiavo, the Florida Legislature, and Governor Bush, Compassion Won! In the coming court battle, let’s pray that compassion wins. In this new millennium, let’s pray that compassion wins. In the hearts and minds of humans the world over, let’s pray that compassion wins.


_____________________________

Derek Holser is the Executive Director of Common Good Foundation, an ecumenical movement devoted to the conversion of culture through four pillars of participation; life, family, freedom and solidarity with the poor. He is also the President of Advocatus, LLC., a full-service lobbying and public relations agency dedicated to "giving a voice to those who have none".


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: charity; florida; terrischiavo
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Contact: Common Good Foundation : http://www.commongoodonline.com

Derek Holser - Executive Director, 757-963-5747

Email at: derek@lawofficelsf.com

1 posted on 10/28/2003 3:37:41 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lady In Blue; Canticle_of_Deborah; MarMema; kimmie7; floriduh voter; JulieRNR21; NautiNurse; ...
ping
2 posted on 10/28/2003 3:39:06 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Michael Schiavo is about as compassionate as a turnip. And his lawyer . . . don't even get me started.
3 posted on 10/28/2003 3:39:28 PM PST by Saundra Duffy (For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Saundra Duffy
I'd rather have that trunip caring for me!
4 posted on 10/28/2003 3:42:15 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Who exactly was supposed to pay for the medical care to sustain a woman in a persistent vegatative state for an indefinite period of time?

I love how some of the same people who bash taxes, welfare, socialized medicine and illegal aliens getting "free" health care are somehow thinking that the taxpayers have an obligation to pay for this woman's care.

Sorry, but when a huge number of doctors and judges agree that her situation is hopeless, and she's been in a persistent vegatative state for many, many years - I do not believe it's fair to force the taxpayers to support her indefinitely.

If the family had paid the costs, then so be it - but the missing factor from all these discussions seems to be the cost of her care.
5 posted on 10/28/2003 3:44:31 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Can you add me to your list?
6 posted on 10/28/2003 3:44:32 PM PST by Valentine_W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Valentine_W
sure thing
7 posted on 10/28/2003 3:44:45 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty
Ping and bump for later reading. Have a high school playoff game to attend - REAL football being played in the rain! :o)
8 posted on 10/28/2003 3:44:50 PM PST by Ladysmith (Low-carbing works!! (223.0 (-37.6)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Polls to freep on this case..

CourtTV needs major freeping
http://www.courttv.com/ctvapp/thirteenth3.cfm

CNN Poll
http://www.cnn.com/CNN/Programs/late.edition/
9 posted on 10/28/2003 3:47:43 PM PST by 4Godsoloved..Hegave (Mat 25:35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Well, by all means if the cost to care for someone is too high lets just get rid of them. Who could blame you? I'm sure you have other things to spend the money on.
10 posted on 10/28/2003 3:49:03 PM PST by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
You obviously haven't followed the case. The husband was awarded $1.3 million, with at least $700,000 earmarked specifically for her treatment. At most, $50,000 of it has been spent on it. Besides that, her parents want to take care of her and are willing to pay for everything. This is not a taxpayer issue.

But, do you support lawsuit abuse? The husband won $1.3 million in court by specifically promising, that he would care for her over her natural lifespan, which said would be a normal lifespan. Now that he got the money from the courts he wanted, and he contradicts his own sworn testimony.

11 posted on 10/28/2003 3:49:56 PM PST by nickcarraway (www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
Who exactly was supposed to pay for the medical care to sustain a woman in a persistent vegatative state for an indefinite period of time?

Help me out here... What was the name Hitler and the Nazis used for the non-productive types like you mentioned above? You know, the ones that were a cost to society and needed to be eliminated?

12 posted on 10/28/2003 3:50:30 PM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
"Who exactly was supposed to pay for the medical care to sustain a woman in a persistent vegatative state for an indefinite period of time? "

Guess you didn't know her dear husband collected over a million $ in a malpractrice suit that he promised would be used for that. Did you know that?
13 posted on 10/28/2003 3:55:31 PM PST by Bluebird Singing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fml
Well, by all means if the cost to care for someone is too high lets just get rid of them. Who could blame you? I'm sure you have other things to spend the money on. If someone wants to spend their private funds on hopeless situations, that's their prerogative. But, when you have someone who has been medically determined to be doomed, sentenced to a non-life status of "persistent vegatative condition", and you are talking about using public dollars to keep their body around indefinitely - well, sorry, you don't get my approval. There are way too many living people who could benefit from medical care to spend huge amounts of money on someone who is almost assuredly not going to make it.
14 posted on 10/28/2003 4:00:27 PM PST by Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
What was the name Hitler and the Nazis used for the non-productive types

That is just garbage. This woman has been evaluated as essentially brain dead to the satisfaction of the courts. Her mind has left this world, to keep her body as an object of worship is just bizarre.

15 posted on 10/28/2003 4:00:58 PM PST by Semper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
ping,please?
16 posted on 10/28/2003 4:06:50 PM PST by Lovergirl (Prayers for Terri. Hang in there Terri. We are gonna get u out of this mess. www.terrisfight.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
I don't think that is what folks are objecting to in your assertion. Terri Schiavo's case is not even close to what you describe ... and you're entitled to hold such beliefs, many powerful people throughout history have held similar beliefs, and in fact much of the apologia in the abortion on demand issue is based upon the same thinking.
17 posted on 10/28/2003 4:07:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh
The funds provided by the lawsuit were supposed to pay for her care.

Terri's parents were paying for her care and letting Michael live in their house, until the lawsuit was concluded and the funds forthcoming.

The moment the funds were cleared, Michael refused to pay back Terri's parents any of the money they had spent on her care, or his living arrangements, food, laundry, etc.

Michael spent some of the money at some phony new age clinic in KOWLIFORNIA, and then afterward stopped all but the bare minimum of funding to provide a bed and not much else for Terri.

Over half of the funds went to two lawyers, Michael's first lawyer during the lawsuit, and then recently George Felos.

I believe he has convinced they can kill Terri and sell her brain to a research center for a huge sum.

THere are tons of posts on the different threads here about Terri, all explaining what I have just told you.

Wonder if you will read this and keep acting like you don't know the answers to your question?

18 posted on 10/28/2003 4:08:12 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Semper
This woman has been evaluated as essentially brain dead to the satisfaction of the courts.

You mean, according to the information being spread by the MEDIA, (which is totally incorrect) she is brain-dead.

Even George Felos and her husband admitted on a talk show that she is NOT BRAIN DEAD.

Apparently there are several FR posters that are. Please don't be one of them.

19 posted on 10/28/2003 4:11:12 PM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bronco_Buster_FweetHyagh

Obviously you are not a "Free"per !!!

.

20 posted on 10/28/2003 4:12:24 PM PST by GeekDejure (<H3> Searching For The Meaning Of "Huge" Fonts !!!</H3>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson